I'm not sure, it's smooth bore, no neckdown like the fox maf, and has a 4 bolt square flange on the intake side.Explorer MAF will not work on a Mustang. The MAF transfer function is not correct.
I'm not sure, it's smooth bore, no neckdown like the fox maf, and has a 4 bolt square flange on the intake side.Explorer MAF will not work on a Mustang. The MAF transfer function is not correct.
I'm not sure, it's smooth bore, no neckdown like the fox maf, and has a 4 bolt square flange on the intake side.
Not off hand, but they seem to be for sale oftenI see an issue. Mustang electronics on a different housing. It looks to be an 94-95 sn95 housinh but using 87-93 electronics.
The electronics need to match the housing meaning you need an 87-93 MAF, or get the correct 94-95 electronics.
As for the TB, it's an explorer 65 that was not fully modified to work. It can be, but you need a mustang TB to pirate. The throttle linkage is not correct, and the tps is the explorer tps which may not be compatible.
Can you get your hands on a stock 87/93 TB?
I'm not sure what it is, I do know that the tps mount has a billet piece that seems to correct the placement of the tps over the tab.Scratch that. The TB linkage is converted. I'm just not sure that TPS is compatible. Might be able to just swap to a mustang tps.
I've done that when I was looking for dead spots. It tested ok.You'd have to hook up s multimeter and verify voltage output is correct.
0.6-1.1 volts at idle, and 4.5 volts at wot
Is it the maf housing or the sensor that is calibrated for the # injectors?
I was going to say the sensor wasn't what you put up, but you beat me to it. Lol
I have a 55 maf with sensor in it I picked up thinking the one installed was not matched to the diameter of the TB. But looks like it is now useless.I think you can buy maf new, or pm me your address and I'll send you one, likely with a sensor on it.
So I'm guessing the smaller sensor is getting saturated prematurely?