2001 Cobra vs 2003 Mach 1 Buy which?

  • Sponsors (?)


Mach is cheaper, since on the title it reads Mustang GT/ Mach 1 pkg.
And the Cobra says SVT Cobra, so they charge more. Atleast they did when I bought mine. About 700 a year difference between the 2 for full coverage.

i had wondered about that. good info.

i do know insuring a cobra isn't cheap. prior to buying my current car, coverage quote on 96 cobra was alot more than on a 00 gt.
 
Woo, that Cobra looks pretty good. Mine is going to run me about $59 a month for full coverage, granted yours may not be anywhere near that due to your area, driving record, etc. However that's about par for my other rides.
 
My 97 Cobra was $3500 a year for insurance when new. I traded it in on a 99FRC Vette, also new, and insurance dropped to $1200. :shrug:


Cobras are redonkulous to insure.
 
I am going to buy the Cobra. Thank you everybody for all your advice. This thread has been beyond helpful in making this decision. I would have loved a Mach but as Lars pointed out, finding one in my price range that wasn't ragged turned out to be very difficult. I will enjoy the Cobra. This is my first Mustang!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
lulz... the guy's first Stang is a Cobra! Way to cut right to the chase.

You'll love it. If you're a sports car driver as opposed to a drag racer, you'll appreciate the IRS.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2014-05-12-15-22-23.png
    Screenshot_2014-05-12-15-22-23.png
    697.5 KB · Views: 341
  • Screenshot_2014-05-12-15-21-42.png
    Screenshot_2014-05-12-15-21-42.png
    700.8 KB · Views: 355