Search results

  1. steve94

    Which engine you rather have in the next Mach 1/ BOSS?

    the darn 5.4 is unersquare meaning it cant rev 5.0 all the way
  2. steve94

    150K TOO MANY MILES?

    that price is too high for the miles. i got my 90 for 4.5K w/140K, but it was completely stock and had ALL the recepiets for everything ever done, down to wiper blade changes.
  3. steve94

    More new pics from Hollywoodextra.com

    i agree, they are actually BIG
  4. steve94

    T-tops and Sunroof on the '05 Stang

    holy taillights batman
  5. steve94

    More new pics from Hollywoodextra.com

    whoa, check out the short looking shfter
  6. steve94

    5.0 Gear Choice

    3.73's rule.
  7. steve94

    2005 Press kit...

    i dont get it, are u supporting or dissing V6's? It took twin turbos to get into the 11s, how impressive :rolleyes: and i thought fords plan was to eventually have the 3.0 in the stangs, but that it juts wasnt ready yet? Either way, i hope the 4.0 is not an indication of weight, but ive...
  8. steve94

    2005 Press kit...

    yeah no crap, but that doesnt mean V6's dont = teh suck
  9. steve94

    2005 Press kit...

    V6 = teh suck anyways. now we just need numbers on the 3V
  10. steve94

    Pictures of 2005 Mustang 4.6L 3V engine

    throttle body
  11. steve94

    Pictures of 2005 Mustang 4.6L 3V engine

    that intake is very LS1ey
  12. steve94

    this rear is nice?? Huh?

    wow, wheres that welcome to last month pic when u need it. thats not the final car its the wrong color.........
  13. steve94

    IN with the old.....

    it might be fast, and a sucess and blah blah, but its a freakin dodge neon that looks like crap. the reason these cars are classics is power and LOOKS.
  14. steve94

    Awesome photoshop pics

    and a helluva lot of time and his hands
  15. steve94

    Would you rather the '06 Cobra have a S/C V8 or V10?

    agreed, a v10 is not a mustang engine plus, v10s sound like crap
Top Bottom
Back
Forums
Menu