In all honesty, being in shape is a LIFESTYLE change, you don't add a workout and you're there.
It usually won't work if you arae doing it for results, you should want to do it because you want to be healthy, not for results. What I'm saying is HEALTH should be the number one priority...
Some Kias have this too. Pretty funny if you ask me.
Imagine what people's explanation would be if they were asked what exactly the "power button" does. LOL They should do it, on Leno or something, he likes cars.
Computers with Green and Black monitors. Oregon Trail!!1 "Jimmy has died of Typhoid".
Ghost Busters
JNCOs fer sure!!!
Nintendo 64.
Structure clothing!
When someone asked if you could dance and you said yes you would try and moonwalk.
JINX!
Other funny stuff.
The Ford 5.0 (302) and the Chevy LS1 (346?) are VERY different engines.
Also let's stop and figure out which engine we are talking about, as the LS engine ranges from 5.7L-7.0L now and where your flow numbers have been taken from.
Gas mileage cannot really be included as this is dependant...
Very true.
I really don't know the ins and outs of R&D and more importantly manufacturing.
I would imagine it is very inexpensive to use multiple variations of the same engine in the lineup of cars, which is what most companies do.
I think there are a TON of factors working into the...
Keep in mind the displacment is now topping 7.0L, I mean yes they do have a great design, but the 5.0 Cammer is still a great comparable engine, OHC is always going to be better. Given all other things equal. Spinning high doesn't hurt either.
The previous owner of my car put a sunroof in and I'm not too fond of it.
It also compromises body rigidity.
They will start to make noise eventually, obviously mine doesn't but once you start getting around 100K+ then it will probably get annoying.
They do have .7 more liters, Ford 351Ws seem to match well.
Also, notice how the new 05 3V intakes look exactly like the LS1 intakes, and even the LT1 looks close, I think they have a superior design.
And yes the Camaro may have better handling, but that long low body kills weight...
Whoa 95SVTCobra! Those are some nice numbers.
Are those typical for a HCI 5.0?
I thought everyone was arounf 300RWHP/TQ with HCIs. How'd you manage so well?
Because water is thinner than oil (meaning that it is less dense), then wouldn't the water be at the top and the oil at the bottom, when considering gravity and whatnot.
Yea, I think thats it, the difference between technology, who knows when the ignition on ouw 5.0s was engineered, ~mid-80s maybe. Compared to the obviously new focus.
cool
While I do want to agree with this, becuse it makes sense to me in the simplistic sense.
I know of a focus that running 27-30PSI 440WHP
making a pass with BFG G-Force Drag Dadials(DOT)tires running an 11.8 @ 123 with 2.0 60ft.
full interior and trim SVT
with STOCK cam and STOCK ignition.
If I bought a new tranny, I would go for a 6-speed, depending on the gearing, the MPG gain, and uasage, the 6-speed might pay for itself. One of the only things you can do to your car that actually SAVES you money.
Are you installing it yourself?