• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1982-1985 5.0 Blocks are Junk.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Realmongo
  • Start date Start date Feb 14, 2006

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Feb 14, 2006
#1
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #1
After a lot more research, the 1982-1985 (including first year roller blocks) are junk. The cylinder walls, bulkheads, and decks are too thin and they suffer from unstable bores (corrected by the semi-siamesed 1986 E6SE roller blocks) that can actually start wavering when pushed hard under a heavy load making for poor compression sealing. The Ford Racing rep I talked to yesterday said they are supposed to hold up to a .030" overbore, but in practice due to their soft grey iron, might not even hold up to only a .020" overbore.

Guess I'm going block hunting after work today for something worth putting money into.
 

$uperstang

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
476
1
0
Detroit, MI
Feb 14, 2006
#2
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #2
Yes these ar bad blocks that were updated to roller in 86 which are the good ones. I would get an 87 or higher block if it were me. I bored my stock block .030 over with my stroker install.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Feb 14, 2006
#3
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #3
I doubt I will get to a high enough power level to have any problems with any of them.

However I seem to have had good luck with 1968 blocks and have 2 of them.
 

PuterAmI

Member
Mar 29, 2003
513
0
16
Madison, Alabama
Feb 14, 2006
#4
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #4
rd said:
I doubt I will get to a high enough power level to have any problems with any of them.
Click to expand...
You may want to rethink that thought.
Mine cracked at the stock 175HP level with only a dual exhaust upgrade at 175K miles.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Feb 14, 2006
#5
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #5
All of the factory 5.0L roller blocks are Mickey Mouse junk.Ford took out a lot of metal compared to the blocks of the 60`s and early 70`s..
 
F

FourEyed85

New Member
Nov 17, 2005
34
1
0
Ligas, Az
Feb 14, 2006
#6
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #6
PuterAmI said:
You may want to rethink that thought.
Mine cracked at the stock 175HP level with only a dual exhaust upgrade at 175K miles.
Click to expand...

damn. that's horrible.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Feb 14, 2006
#7
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #7
The only good 302 Ford blocks are the 4 bolts. Even the Sportsman is only recommended to 450hp.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Feb 14, 2006
#8
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #8
i had a 68 block for sale but nobody want it, go look in the scrapyard for it now, got a 79 351w one now
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Feb 14, 2006
#9
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #9
rd said:
I doubt I will get to a high enough power level to have any problems with any of them.

However I seem to have had good luck with 1968 blocks and have 2 of them.
Click to expand...

Those were a thicker casting, don't lose them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
  • Locked
FS: 1993 LX 5.0 347 stroker reef blue/black int.
  • 87nitemare
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
18K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 19, 2010
87nitemare
8
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?