• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

2.79:1 "conventional"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Myfirst67
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2004

Myfirst67

New Member
Jan 26, 2004
88
0
0
richmond, California
Jul 4, 2004
#1
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #1
Is my stock 2.79:1 "conventional" ratio very mild? and if i wanted to take to steps up from that what would that ratio be? and would i feel the change? Also who has the cheapest gear kits?
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Jul 4, 2004
#2
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #2
Well, 2.79 was a common raito used, as it was the standard along with an open differential. The next step up is 3.00 I think, and you probably wouldn't feel a huge difference, if you feel any that is. The cheapest gears are probably going to be richmond gears from summit. 4.30's and 4.11's are going to be the least expensive set as well.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jul 4, 2004
#3
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #3
There's a million threads on diff gears on here, perhaps you will get what you're looking for out of those. There is one relatively recent that should give you good info.

It all depends on what you have, what you do, and what you want to do. If you have a non-overdrive transmission, and do a lot of highway driving, and want to keep doing highway driving, pleasantly, then 4.30 gears aren't for you. If you have overdrive and want a high-performance beast that chases other cars around town like a cat after mice, then something big like 4.11 would suit you, and give you lots of power at the tyres. Getting that power to the ground is another matter though. If you don't have a suspension / tyre package to handle mobs of grunt, there is no real point getting big gears. Also, a clapped-out motor won't look kindly on being flogged, so that has to be taken into account. If you have a relatively fresh motor, it isn't an issue.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Jul 5, 2004
#4
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #4
Route666 said:
a high-performance beast that chases other cars around town like a cat after mice........
Click to expand...


classic D.Hearne for you.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 5, 2004
#5
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #5
6Stang7 said:
classic D.Hearne for you.
Click to expand...
Now what ever gave you that idea? Must have seen me in action lately in my 89 V8 Ranger
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 5, 2004
#6
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #6
Route666 hit it right on the head. Can't argue with him. If you want a good all aorund gear set in your rear, then something like 3.50's will give you what you want. Not too many rpms on the highway and still enough to get from red light to redlight in a hurry.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jul 5, 2004
#7
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #7
6Stang7 thanks I'm a constant source of wit when I'm in the mood lol.

I would add to the diff equation too, D.Hearne reminded me (remound me?, like rewound, not rewinded, anyways) that classic stangs are relatively light, and you can be a bit more conservative with gears and still get good performance.
 

Myfirst67

New Member
Jan 26, 2004
88
0
0
richmond, California
Jul 5, 2004
#8
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #8
Ok one more question ,my 67 coupe is all stock should i get the 3.55 ratio or 3.80 ratio first or upgrade my engine and exhaust first.o yeah my car is a daily driver and in what upgrade well i feel the most change?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 5, 2004
#9
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #9
If you're using it as a daily driver and do not have overdrive, go with the 3.55 ratio. The 3.80's will be a little hard to live with at highway speeds. My Ranger is just so. I'm running 3.73's with 28 inch tires ( 275/60/15's) and this translates to what you'd have if you went with 3.55's and the Stangs normal 26 inch tires. 75 mph is the upper limit at what I'll let it cruise for any length of time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
45
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
865
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
290
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
D
After Market fuel rails with Stock fuel lines
  • dropteeth
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
134
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
2000xp8
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
745
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 5:51 PM
DTCRAWLEY
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?