• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

2005 mustang nose on classic mustang - has it been done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wildstang
  • Start date Start date May 1, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
57
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
members.cardomain.com
May 6, 2008
#21
  • May 6, 2008
  • #21
izzy jr said:
I'd be easier if you use a 67 and up, the 64 1/2-66 are not as wide as the later models
Click to expand...


In real life I agree, in photoshop anything can be made to fit though, just takes more patience.
 
W

wildstang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 1999
217
0
0
Orange, Vermont
May 6, 2008
#22
  • May 6, 2008
  • #22
I have a 65 so that is why I was interested in it. Very good first try Pakrat. doesn't look quite like I thought it would but I think shorting the valance up and completing the wheel arch in the front would do wonders for it.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
57
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
members.cardomain.com
May 6, 2008
#23
  • May 6, 2008
  • #23
Yeah I did it as a quicke just for a look see with no finishing touches but no matter what angle I try the headlights and grill just don't work right, they come out flat looking like a Pinto or Mustang II and do nothing for the classic lines.

Just the lower valance works much better though. With enough work and fibergalss you could probably remove some of the middle section from a real one and make it work this way.

 

Attachments

  • 65-05A.webp
    34.4 KB · Views: 430

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
57
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
members.cardomain.com
May 6, 2008
#24
  • May 6, 2008
  • #24
Of course anyone who's done a custom mod knows that you fall victim to the domino effect very quickly. You do something like this and you just have to add a custom side exhaust to complete the pro touring look.

 

Attachments

  • 65-05A1.webp
    34.7 KB · Views: 418

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
57
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
members.cardomain.com
May 6, 2008
#25
  • May 6, 2008
  • #25
Yeah, see, those old 14" rims just don't cut it anymore now, you really need something more modern. It just never ends.

 

Attachments

  • 65-05A2.webp
    34.6 KB · Views: 411

DK832

New Member
Apr 11, 2006
291
0
0
Copenhagen, DK
May 6, 2008
#26
  • May 6, 2008
  • #26
You're on a roll! It's actually close to looking OK.
 
W

wildstang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 1999
217
0
0
Orange, Vermont
May 7, 2008
#27
  • May 7, 2008
  • #27
I think with the 05 headlight buckets and the chrome bumper gone or color matched, that would look really good. I don't think the chrome bumper fits the style of the valance.
 

izzy jr

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
76
1
0
Abilene,TX
May 7, 2008
#28
  • May 7, 2008
  • #28
Looking better! The rear end of the car needs some sort of wheel flare or skirting now to blend in with the rest of the body kit.
 
6

6T6coupe

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2000
219
0
0
home.cfl.rr.com
May 9, 2008
#29
  • May 9, 2008
  • #29
Pakrat said:
Click to expand...

You know, that doesn't look half bad, although I would lose the rear wing and make the front chin a little more conservative. 99-04 GT's are dirt cheap right now. That would be a neat body kit. Somebody call Cervini and get this one on the market!
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
57
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
members.cardomain.com
May 9, 2008
#30
  • May 9, 2008
  • #30
6T6coupe said:
You know, that doesn't look half bad, although I would lose the rear wing and make the front chin a little more conservative. 99-04 GT's are dirt cheap right now. That would be a neat body kit. Somebody call Cervini and get this one on the market!
Click to expand...

I agree, I only chose the Cobra model to chop because it was the first one I saw at the same angle of the 69 nose I was using.
 
6

6T6coupe

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2000
219
0
0
home.cfl.rr.com
May 9, 2008
#31
  • May 9, 2008
  • #31
The 69 nose is cool. I wonder how a 70 front end would look? Might go better with the rest of the late model body.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
www.reenmachine.com
May 9, 2008
#32
  • May 9, 2008
  • #32
mustang6tee8 said:
I remember a S197 with classic fenders, doors, quarters in one of the magazines last year. Cant remember which issue though. I believe it was in Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords. Absolutely incredible..
Click to expand...

This I understand -- taking a great modern car and giving it the looks of a classic.

But why do so many people want to turn that around? They want an old Mustang that doesn't look like an old Mustang, has an entirely modernized interior that doesn't look like the classic's, modern drivetrain, modern suspension & brakes, modern steering, and on and on and on...

At this point you've spent a TON of dough and have all of the trappings of a new Mustang attached to a weak, inferior structure.

So why not just get an S197 and mod it?
 
0

01ragtop

Member
May 20, 2004
88
0
7
San Diego
May 9, 2008
#33
  • May 9, 2008
  • #33
reenmachine said:
This I understand -- taking a great modern car and giving it the looks of a classic.

But why do so many people want to turn that around? They want an old Mustang that doesn't look like an old Mustang, has an entirely modernized interior that doesn't look like the classics's, modern drivetrain, modern suspension & brakes, modern steering, and on and on and on...

At this point you've spent a TON of dough and have all of the trappings of a new Mustang attached to a weak, inferior structure.

So why not just get an S197 and mod it?
Click to expand...


Okay I'll bite on this hook.

I can think of quite a few safer, faster, better handling, and just plain better cars than the Mustang. However, I cannot think of a car that is more fun. I would even argue that some of the reasons that the Mustang is so much fun is precisely because it is not the fastest, safest or best handling car on the road. That is where the owner gets his chance to play automobile designer. I know in my own build I am planning on making quite a few "upgrades" to the brakes, suspension, gas tank, engine, and interior, and those things, because they are so outdated by today's standards, are what make this more like re-engineering a car than modding a car.

I have owned a SN-95, and I currently own a S-197. People mod these all the time, but to me it just isn't the same. On my s-197 I thought about trying to trim the front bumper, give the rear quarters "hips" and fixing the funky lines of the truck and rear bumper, but then reality hit me. I probably will trade the thing in a few years from now, and if I did all that I would ruin the trade in value. I don't ever plan on getting rid of my 66, so I am free to change what I like.

My $.02
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
www.reenmachine.com
May 9, 2008
#34
  • May 9, 2008
  • #34
01ragtop said:
Okay I'll bite on this hook.

I can think of quite a few safer, faster, better handling, and just plain better cars than the Mustang. However, I cannot think of a car that is more fun. I would even argue that some of the reasons that the Mustang is so much fun is precisely because it is not the fastest, safest or best handling car on the road. That is where the owner gets his chance to play automobile designer. I know in my own build I am planning on making quite a few "upgrades" to the brakes, suspension, gas tank, engine, and interior, and those things, because they are so outdated by today's standards, are what make this more like re-engineering a car than modding a car.

I have owned a SN-95, and I currently own a S-197. People mod these all the time, but to me it just isn't the same. On my s-197 I thought about trying to trim the front bumper, give the rear quarters "hips" and fixing the funky lines of the truck and rear bumper, but then reality hit me. I probably will trade the thing in a few years from now, and if I did all that I would ruin the trade in value. I don't ever plan on getting rid of my 66, so I am free to change what I like.

My $.02
Click to expand...
Believe me brother, I'm with you on all counts noted above. I have devoted this part of my life to it. Making a classic Mustang work like a new one is an amazing, worthy, and rewarding feat. My point was that if you make it look like a late-model on top of all that, internally and externally, where is the classic Mustang? It's just an S197 with a different unibody structure.
 
0

01ragtop

Member
May 20, 2004
88
0
7
San Diego
May 9, 2008
#35
  • May 9, 2008
  • #35
Yep, I completely misunderstood you. Sorry.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
www.reenmachine.com
May 10, 2008
#36
  • May 10, 2008
  • #36
Pakrat said:
Looks like the Ring Brothers have some serious competition coming, that car is almost unrecognizable.
Click to expand...
The Ring Brothers don't try to make their cars unrecognizable. That's the beauty of their art -- the bodies are heavily modified and often re-proportioned but the end result is still very recognizable as a classic Mustang.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
40
St pete, Florida
www.myspace.com
May 11, 2008
#37
  • May 11, 2008
  • #37
Check this project out... there 5 more videos after that its going to be sick....




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htcloaqRIHY


I cant wait for the finished project...
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 12, 2008
#38
  • May 12, 2008
  • #38
I'm with Reen on this. To me, the 2005 Mustang is just a tweaked and rehashed version the original late '60s design. It's a copy without being classic. Why on Earth would anyone want to take the "classic" out of a classic?
 
6

6T6coupe

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2000
219
0
0
home.cfl.rr.com
May 12, 2008
#39
  • May 12, 2008
  • #39
Agree. I'm not too fond of the restyling exercises that eliminate chrome bumpers and add a plastic valence to older cars. In my eyese, it just doesn't look quite right.

OTOH, I can't help but look at the '05-'08 Mustang and wonder what it would look like if you added some more classic influence like chrome bumpers front and rear, or a restyle to a 69-70 nose.

But the '05-'08 is already has a very classic influence. It's the SN95 that has the most potential, IMO, to add some more flair. Not just older sheetmetal added to the car, but a blend of old with some new. In a case like that, a '67-'70 Mustang or Shelby front end treatment, for example, might look really good with a modern interpretation of a lower valance.

That's what I love about this stuff....there's a lot of ways to inject art into the mechanics of it all.
 
S

suki243

Member
Dec 19, 2006
662
0
19
Southern California
May 12, 2008
#40
  • May 12, 2008
  • #40
Check this project out... there 5 more videos after that its going to be sick....




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htcloaqRIHY


I cant wait for the finished project...
Click to expand...

Wow! that's a lot of work, looks promising though
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Looking for a passenger side AC Compressor mount
  • mustangTodd
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
129
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Feb 10, 2026
mustangTodd
M
C
2005 Mustang GT Thermostat Housing
  • Cmrd
  • Apr 4, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
184
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 15, 2026
Cmrd
C
Classic Car Insurance
  • Willybill32
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
83
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
P
New here
  • PortCity
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
103
The Welcome Wagon Jun 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
85
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?