2005 Mustang Spec's

B

bullitt3719

New Member

Mar 22, 2004

4

0

0

Mar 22, 2004

#1

• Mar 22, 2004

• #1

I am looking to find out everything I can for the new mustang. I would like to know paint colors, interior colors, and etc. Any help would be greatly appreicated.

 

numenor27

New Member

Jan 3, 2004

252

0

0

Chicago, IL

Mar 22, 2004

#2

• Mar 22, 2004

• #2

exterior colors are black, redfire, legend lime, windveil blue, sonic blue, sceaming yellow, satin silver, mineal grey, performance white,torch red. So far, I have seen the interioir with a greyish leather, a interior option with red leather and an interior option with blue leathe.

 

S

SWortham

New Member

Jan 11, 2004

81

0

0

Mar 23, 2004

#3

• Mar 23, 2004

• #3

Here's a lot of other technical specs on it...
http://www.maximum-cars.com/Cars/Car.php?carnumber=521

-- impressive weight distribution of 53/47!

 

B

bullitt3719

New Member

Mar 22, 2004

4

0

0

Mar 24, 2004

#4

• Mar 24, 2004

• #4

Need Help w/ 2005 Mustang Specs

bullitt3719 said:

I am looking to find out everything I can for the new mustang. I would like to know paint colors, interior colors, and etc. Any help would be greatly appreicated.

Click to expand...

I am looking for more detail like the demensions of certain parts. I am really trying to find out if there are any CAD drawing availble for the new mustang.
I would like to make parts for the new mustang right before it comes out.

 

99SilverGT

Founding Member

Apr 11, 2002

1,660

0

0

Jacksonville, FL

Mar 24, 2004

#5

• Mar 24, 2004

• #5

Wow thats kind of risky man. I would NEVER go by anything like that from the internet before its actually released. I guarantee you that a lot of them will be wrong/changed. I'd only go by something that I got directly from Ford.

 

numenor27

New Member

Jan 3, 2004

252

0

0

Chicago, IL

Mar 24, 2004

#6

• Mar 24, 2004

• #6

99SilverGT said:

Wow thats kind of risky man. I would NEVER go by anything like that from the internet before its actually released. I guarantee you that a lot of them will be wrong/changed. I'd only go by something that I got directly from Ford.

Click to expand...

agreed.

 

S

ShishCoBob

Founding Member

Apr 6, 2002

116

0

0

Mar 25, 2004

#7

• Mar 25, 2004

• #7

99SilverGT said:

Wow thats kind of risky man. I would NEVER go by anything like that from the internet before its actually released. I guarantee you that a lot of them will be wrong/changed. I'd only go by something that I got directly from Ford.

Click to expand...

Those are official preliminary stats provided by Ford FYI.

 

B

bullitt3719

New Member

Mar 22, 2004

4

0

0

Mar 25, 2004

#8

• Mar 25, 2004

• #8

99SilverGT said:

Wow thats kind of risky man. I would NEVER go by anything like that from the internet before its actually released. I guarantee you that a lot of them will be wrong/changed. I'd only go by something that I got directly from Ford.

Click to expand...

I agree with you, does anyone know if there are any finally measurements available from Ford yet?

 

S

ShishCoBob

Founding Member

Apr 6, 2002

116

0

0

Mar 25, 2004

#9

• Mar 25, 2004

• #9

bullitt3719 said:

I agree with you, does anyone know if there are any finally measurements available from Ford yet?

Click to expand...

No. Ford has not released any revisions or anything to there preliminary stats since NAIAS.

 

GelatiCruiser

Founding Member

Jun 7, 2002

1,054

0

0

1 Mile South of Somewhere.

Mar 25, 2004

#10

• Mar 25, 2004

• #10

I wouldn't do it "right before" the new Pony comes out....I'd do it "right after"....there's a difference between being backlogged with orders due to too many orders than being backlogged with orders due to wrong dimensions/measurements.
Too many orders = $$$$ for your pocket.
Too many fugg-ups = $$$$$$$$ FROM your pocket.

 

H

hyepwrd

New Member

Mar 17, 2003

5

0

0

Mar 28, 2004

#11

• Mar 28, 2004

• #11

It seems pretty heavy to me. I was hoping it was under 3000.

 

A

AF_Z06

New Member

Mar 28, 2004

21

0

0

Enid, Oklahoma

Mar 28, 2004

#12

• Mar 28, 2004

• #12

3400 lbs seems right for a 4 seater sports car running a V8. They would have to make it out of Carbon Fiber to get it below 3000.

 

SVTdriver

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2001

3,319

0

0

Seattle Wa

Mar 28, 2004

#13

• Mar 28, 2004

• #13

It would have been nice to be under 3000. But when was the last time a regular mustang came in under 3000?

 

S

SWortham

New Member

Jan 11, 2004

81

0

0

Mar 28, 2004

#14

• Mar 28, 2004

• #14

Even my '97 V6 Mustang had better handling and felt more nimble than my 2,600 pound Hyundai Elantra... that is, until I modified the Elantra. But 3,400 pounds is still good for a Mustang GT cranking out 300 hp.