• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

4.6 Reliability ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter djh3_88
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
T

TripleBlk

Member
Nov 12, 2002
312
3
19
Cape Canaveral FL
Jul 14, 2010
#21
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #21
Back to the Future

Yep, these motors are reliable.

Closer engine tolerances, but the main thing is Fuel Injection. No more raw fuel washing down the cylinders and causing ring wear, etc.

The other advance was the coil-on-plug idea. Notice how the other manufacturers copied it ?

Ford has tightened up on QA, and I'm counting on 200K + on my motor.
 
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Jul 14, 2010
#22
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #22
djh3_88 said:
OK thanks got some questions answered. Not to terrebly worried about the PI thing now as gas is so freak'n high and changes so often one of the local stations hired a guy just to change prices all day. Anyways I was trying to find out on the intake problem what years are prone to that? On the PI side you would have to swap heads and some other things to get the raise in HP PLUS change up the programing of the ECM. Can you do it by just changing ann ECM from say 99 ? By "adding a tuner or timing adjuster" I am asuming like a superchips type deal ?
Click to expand...

Honestly, I would skip the 96-98 models and go straight for a 99-00 model. 1) you get 260hp stock 2) they look better 3) they get a tad better mileage 4) the odometer is all electronic and no gear replacements.

If you got say a 98 for say 1-2k less you wouldnt be saving much. 1) the car will be slower than your 5.0 its not just about hp tq is huge too. 2) if you swapped P.I heads, cams and intake plus a new ecu you would also need to swap our your odometer since the 99's are programed to use electronic ones. Or you can keep your ecu and get a custom tune ($300-500) depending where you go by the time you pay for all the parts and labor your looking at 1.5k-3k depending on who you know. Save up a little more and get the 99 model. You'll be happy in the end you did. You might even get one with less mileage.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Jul 14, 2010
#23
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #23
+1 on going to the 99+ cars, i have a 97gt with a 05 pi motor with 32k miles. it as well came out of a police interceptor sheriffs car that was totaled. the original engine had a tick over 228k miles, it smoked a lil bit. also it would tick a little on first crank up. trust me i beat the **** out of this motor. did i kill it? no i honestly think with religuos maintnence that i performed, the engine ran perfectly when i pulled. i have a set of brand new pi heads that im planning a build with my old engine and sell it to buy a trickflow top end kit.
 

Dark04GT

10 Year Member
Apr 27, 2008
758
62
59
NC
Jul 14, 2010
#24
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #24
2 year old thread brought back from the dead.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jul 14, 2010
#25
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #25
I've been beating on my 1998 4.6 Towncar since last August while my car is being painted and tweaked. My car was an Ex Police vehicle and i got it with 168k on it. Now i have 183k on it and have driven that car to Atlanta and many other long trips With nothing more than a tuneup and tires. At this rate it WILL easily make it to the 200k+ club with ease.
 

Maxpowers

Member
Sep 9, 2009
859
2
19
Pittsburgh, Pa
Jul 14, 2010
#26
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #26
Dark04GT said:
2 year old thread brought back from the dead.
Click to expand...

 
T

TripleBlk

Member
Nov 12, 2002
312
3
19
Cape Canaveral FL
Jul 14, 2010
#27
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #27
Actually - kinda a germane topic , since these things have been around a while.

I'd rather keep my PAID FOR ride going as long as possible.

Yeah, I resurrected this thread - so what ?
 
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Jul 14, 2010
#28
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • #28
Dark04GT said:
2 year old thread brought back from the dead.
Click to expand...

Haha i just noticed that too! I also noticed that djh3_88 didn't buy a mustang. His last post was this topic. I guess he went ahead and bought foreign. I guess we'll never know! O we'll we know the 4.6 is reliable. When left stock...
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jul 15, 2010
#29
  • Jul 15, 2010
  • #29
The 4.6 engine is highly reliable. Its the suspension, brakes, transmission, electrical systems, fuel tank, and a million common problems that you have to worry about.
 

streethorse

15 Year Member
Oct 8, 2005
1,042
6
58
Dallas Texas
Jul 15, 2010
#30
  • Jul 15, 2010
  • #30
Kilgore Trout said:
The 4.6 engine is highly reliable. Its the suspension, brakes, transmission, electrical systems, fuel tank, and a million common problems that you have to worry about.
Click to expand...

Not in my experience sir.
Ive got 75k miles......
Brakes are still the factory original.... 25% pad left.
Suspension.... all original factory shocks & struts still firm as new.
Transmission... fluid changed at 35k, still shifts perfect.
Electrical.... never one problem
Fuel tank.... no issues. Rock on.
 
G

GettinThere

Member
Jul 29, 2005
553
1
19
Central Texas
Jul 15, 2010
#31
  • Jul 15, 2010
  • #31
streethorse said:
Not in my experience sir.
Click to expand...

Same here, except for the power window motor going out under warranty. This car has been the most reliable car I've owned (Olds, Mazda, GMC, Ranger pu, Plymouth, Honda).

 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jul 15, 2010
#32
  • Jul 15, 2010
  • #32
Its a crap shoot when you buy a car built on an assemble line. I heard both sides, yay and nay. But, one thing that is consistant, you add forced induction to the engine w/o building it again, you take a gamble; odds not in your favor.
The engine has more detailed payed more attention to it then the rest of the car on the assemble line, the rest is more of a gamble b/c its a fact employees get complacent no matter what profession!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
29
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
J
Timing cover for npi 4.6
  • jay99914
  • Oct 26, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
220
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 28, 2024
jay99914
J
New gal in San Diego
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
163
The Welcome Wagon Feb 11, 2026
Mcmahst
Electrical Issues with my 2006 mustang gt
  • VerneVdV
  • May 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
38
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 22, 2026
VerneVdV
L
Help with 1986 GT 5 Speed Please
  • Lcasada1999
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
183
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?