• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

4bbl vaccum vs mechanical secondary, what does it mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5.0 Fiend
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2004
5

5.0 Fiend

New Member
Mar 23, 2004
51
0
0
Aug 19, 2004
#1
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #1
I plan on getting a new carb in the future, I was leaning towards a barry grant speed demon 650, (I have a holley 750 now), and I was wondering what is so differnt about mechanical and vaccum secondaries. Fuel mileage? Power? Torque? Also is a choke tower actually necessary for a street car? (I live in PA).
 
3

351 82GT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
430
0
0
Aug 19, 2004
#2
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #2
Mechanical secondaries open up when the throttle reaches a certain point. Usually not long after the throttle is pressed.
Vacuuum secondaries only open up when the engine vacuum reaches a certain level.
There are a lot of variables to determine which is better for your setup such as gears, transmission, vehical weight,...etc.
Usually, lighter cars benefit better with mechanicals and heavier cars are better off with vacuum but like I said, it all depends on engine setup.
 
5

5.0 Fiend

New Member
Mar 23, 2004
51
0
0
Aug 20, 2004
#3
  • Aug 20, 2004
  • #3
Hey 351 82gt, I see you live in Danvill, I live near State College (Penn State). I will be running an basically stock block 88 motor with headers,patriot side dump exhaust, holley stealth intake, blaster 2 coil, duraspark 2 ignition, and 373 rear end, what do you think, mechanical?
 
3

351 82GT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
430
0
0
Aug 20, 2004
#4
  • Aug 20, 2004
  • #4
Myself, I would go with the vacuum carb. They are more "forgiving" than mechanicals.
If you had more mods done then I would say mechanicals.
Compression ratio also plays a part too.
Vacuum carbs will only open the secondaries when the engine needs it.
Mechanicals open the secondaries if youe engine needs more gas or not....in a sense. More tuning is required with mechanical carbs.
I think you will be happier with a vacuum carb. IMO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Expired Barry Grant 750 Cfm Demon Carbureator
  • MachOneMan
  • Jul 9, 2013
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
2K
Engine and Power Adder Jul 9, 2013
MachOneMan
help with carburetor choice
  • bdepedro
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
3K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Apr 25, 2013
clement
What It Cost Me To Not Put An Ls In My Fox.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2014
CarMichael Angelo
347 Dyno results Flat tappet
  • 65FBE2
  • Sep 10, 2010
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 11, 2010
Young Gun
S
Howdy from Maine
  • shaboopy
  • Aug 21, 2011
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
832
The Welcome Wagon Aug 22, 2011
LAVAgt2012
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?