Drivetrain T5 bellhousing differences: 83-85 vs 86-93

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
41,622
17,228
224
Massachusetts
The is more of a general FYI. I don't want to issue a blanket statement based on testing between only 2 samples.

Since I had an 83-85 bell and 86-93 bell, I decided to see what the differences were. There was a lot of statements about the early bells being smaller, or then being the same. Decided to see for myself with the two castings I happened to have.

E3ZR-6394-AA 83-85 T5 v8 bell on left

E6ZR-6394-AA 86-93 t5 v8 bell on right

65C6583D-5E5B-4E74-868D-CD9D33112093.jpeg

15DBDAAC-BDD2-4135-ACE9-10213ED4D67A.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Sponsors (?)


My method was simple, i rotates the flywheel/clutch assembly around probing to find the tightest spot, and then I used clay to measure.

Parts were a Ford Racing billet flywheel and a FR cobra clutch setup (from the early 2000s). These clutches are notorious for being close, but that doesn’t matter for this test as i'm just measuring distance from pressure plate to bell.

If you search around, there are various threads stating contact between pressure plate and bell in this area depending on what clutch setup is used. The Kink Cobra setup I have was notorious for this as you can see by the very close proximity. I wonder if this adds to the rumors about various bells being "smaller". In my case, it was tight on both year bells.

The test area

58FD5BD4-01C6-4B3E-891F-C941DD48FD8D.jpeg
 
Last edited:
So what is the difference? As far as I can tell after searching all over is the lack of this casting boss feature circled heRe. This could very well just be differences between various foundries churning these out, but it's really the only detail that is notably different on the two bellhousings i have

687DC2B4-1011-4502-AE0D-85BBD9E5AD00.jpeg

FFABD84A-F436-408F-9E63-7FA19803E3D7.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Useful
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users