• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

96 stang.

  • Thread starter Thread starter gvr4ever
  • Start date Start date Mar 15, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
G

gvr4ever

New Member
Mar 15, 2006
10
0
0
Mar 15, 2006
#1
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #1
Please don't flame too much, but I don't know too much about the first 4.6L stangs.

Do they have any problems for the first year? I didn't think I would want one, but I test drove one the other day and I enjoyed it. It was too beat up to buy, but I'm going to look at what I think is a clean one tomorrow.

The main question(s) I have is, what trans is in it (5sp,GT)? Did they revise/fix anything in 97?

I think the one I'm going to be looking at has 7xK miles and it's suppost to be clean and the asking price is in the right range. I hope things go well. I acually called about another one and the sales guy was honest enough to tell me that it was used for drag racing and not in the best shape, but they had a clean stocker. I found the worst sleezy dealer the other day, so I hope tomorrow goes better.

Thanks
 

Steve777

New Member
Jun 21, 2004
208
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Mar 15, 2006
#2
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #2
gvr4ever said:
Please don't flame too much, but I don't know too much about the first 4.6L stangs.

Do they have any problems for the first year? I didn't think I would want one, but I test drove one the other day and I enjoyed it. It was too beat up to buy, but I'm going to look at what I think is a clean one tomorrow.

The main question(s) I have is, what trans is in it (5sp,GT)? Did they revise/fix anything in 97?

I think the one I'm going to be looking at has 7xK miles and it's suppost to be clean and the asking price is in the right range. I hope things go well. I acually called about another one and the sales guy was honest enough to tell me that it was used for drag racing and not in the best shape, but they had a clean stocker. I found the worst sleezy dealer the other day, so I hope tomorrow goes better.

Thanks
Click to expand...

My '96 has 80,000 miles on it and this is what I'll tell you...

-the stock intake manifold is almost guarunteed to crack and will need replaced
-the low oil light tends to come on randomly, even when the oil isn't low (I read that this is from a problem with the sensor and/or its location)
-Not really a problem, but there is a lack of performance in the 96-98 models due to their restrictive intakes/heads/cams (later improved in the 99+ models). Many people with these years end up doing a headswap for significant power gains
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Mar 15, 2006
#3
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #3
The 4.6L is a good reliable motor. As pointed out, the above is only real flaw. The 96 - 98 heads are not that restrictive compared to the 99+ 2V heads, it is the cams and intake on the 98- cars that are the restriction.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 15, 2006
#4
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #4
I like mine, i am the original owner and have only ever had 1 part fail and that was a $50 part IAC valve and was an easy 5 minute swap. And this happens to all 4.6 gt's. If the price is right go for it.
 
G

gvr4ever

New Member
Mar 15, 2006
10
0
0
Mar 15, 2006
#5
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #5
I was aware of the 99 upgrades. I really don't care so much about that. In fact, I'm hoping to save money by going with the unpopular years. I test drove one and while it wasn't fast, it was fast enough to get me to work and back. I just need a cheap daily driver right now and I want a RWD car, and cheap Ford parts. I acually will do suspention mods first and the 96 comes with a strut tower brace stock. While it's not much, it's a start and since I only care about how the car handles and stops at first, I acually want the slower 4.6L stangs. It looks like they dropped the strut tower brace in 98 tho Oh well. Lower miles is all I really care about, and while it's getting harder to find, I think I found one worth checking out.

I didn't know about the intake manifold. I wanted to know if the 96 had the older T5 style trans that the 5.0s had, or the tremic from the 99s+ that have issues. I test drove one junky 96/97 stang the other day and the trans shifted just fine. The engine seemed fine too, it's just someone didn't take care of it at all.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Mar 15, 2006
#6
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #6
gvr4ever said:
I was aware of the 99 upgrades. I really don't care so much about that. In fact, I'm hoping to save money by going with the unpopular years. I test drove one and while it wasn't fast, it was fast enough to get me to work and back. I just need a cheap daily driver right now and I want a RWD car, and cheap Ford parts. I acually will do suspention mods first and the 96 comes with a strut tower brace stock. While it's not much, it's a start and since I only care about how the car handles and stops at first, I acually want the slower 4.6L stangs. It looks like they dropped the strut tower brace in 98 tho Oh well. Lower miles is all I really care about, and while it's getting harder to find, I think I found one worth checking out.

I didn't know about the intake manifold. I wanted to know if the 96 had the older T5 style trans that the 5.0s had, or the tremic from the 99s+ that have issues. I test drove one junky 96/97 stang the other day and the trans shifted just fine. The engine seemed fine too, it's just someone didn't take care of it at all.
Click to expand...

all the 96-01 1/2 4.6 mustangs got the t-45 tremec.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Mar 16, 2006
#7
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #7
I guess since you don't want the extra 40Hp, you can stick to the pre 99's. Just make sure you get it carfaxed and have the compression checked before you buy it
 

jcint

Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
2
16
wellington florida
Mar 16, 2006
#8
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #8
I have a 96 gt for almost 2 years now and still love to drive it. never had any issues with it, runs very strong and it's stock. My airbag light stays on all the time but that don't bother me. Consider one of the slowest stangs out there but but when i floor it it pushes me back into my seat
 

Miles

Founding Member
Aug 14, 2001
1,225
0
0
Burlington, ON
Mar 16, 2006
#9
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #9
My 97GT is almost 10 years old, and it is still my baby. Same deal w/ the IAC valve, but used carb cleaner and it has held up for the last 2 years ($50 part anyway).

A short-throw shifter and gears made the car a lot more fun to drive... not to mention the overhaul of the entire exhaust.

Great car and very affordable as they are becoming the old old model
 

reeber

10 Year Member
Mar 10, 2004
574
26
38
Berlin, NJ
Mar 16, 2006
#10
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #10
I like the '96's because people expect you to be slow. I'll pull next to a '99-up stang and they are sure that I am going to lose.... Until the light turns green... I love to see the look on thier faces.. then again, I love the "sleeper" look.
 
G

gvr4ever

New Member
Mar 15, 2006
10
0
0
Mar 16, 2006
#11
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #11
svttech76 said:
all the 96-01 1/2 4.6 mustangs got the t-45 tremec.
Click to expand...

Acually, I will look at the 99-01 1/2 then too. I just don't want the problematic tremic 3650. I don't want to gamble with the problem and I HATE transmissions that are clunky and grindy.

Is there a web page that I could do a VIN search on the 01s, or a production cut off date that would have the t-45 trans?
 

ACSPONY

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 10, 2004
711
2
19
Ohio
Mar 16, 2006
#12
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #12
The Mustang GT in 2001 had both the T5/T-45 and 3650 Transmissions. Check the driver's door for a sticker and look under "TR" for a "K". If it has a "K" then the car has the 3650 Transmission.
 

poorcollegekid

Member
Mar 31, 2005
74
0
6
Mount Carmel, IL
Mar 16, 2006
#13
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #13
you can really open them up just putting a full exhaust on it...take off the 6 cats...thatll be the biggest difference. i had one...it was reliable...though i did crack the intake manifold. my radiator also cracked, but it was not a common problem, and i had my valve seals replaced...but that was my choice to do...it was starting to smoke if id sit in a place for awhile then move...it wouldnt have been noticable if i hadnt removed the cats. but theyre nice cars...IMO the rear end of a 96-8 is the best looking rear end ever put on a mustang. and a 96-8 with side exhaust looks SICK!
 

DTNODYA

Member
Dec 15, 2005
831
1
16
Mar 16, 2006
#14
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #14
gvr4ever said:
It looks like they dropped the strut tower brace in 98 tho Oh well.
Click to expand...

Yep, and also no dash clock. I have a 98 and love it! (but I wish it had a dash clock lol) ....
 
C

cltgt

Founding Member
Apr 15, 2001
931
0
0
Geneva, Fl.
Mar 16, 2006
#15
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #15
Hope you get the car. You will enjoy it!
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Mar 16, 2006
#16
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #16
TGJ said:
The 96 - 98 heads are not that restrictive compared to the 99+ 2V heads, it is the cams and intake on the 98- cars that are the restriction.
Click to expand...
i beg to differ. the 99+ heads flow much better then the 96-98's.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 16, 2006
#17
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #17
Dan_Soprano said:
i beg to differ. the 99+ heads flow much better then the 96-98's.
Click to expand...
Not by much, its the exhaust flow where they excel over NPI's. It really is the PI Intake/PI Cams that make the difference for 99 up GT's.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Mar 16, 2006
#18
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #18
Dan_Soprano said:
i beg to differ. the 99+ heads flow much better then the 96-98's.
Click to expand...

That is fine, beg to differ all you want! I disagree!
 
G

gvr4ever

New Member
Mar 15, 2006
10
0
0
Mar 16, 2006
#19
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #19
Thanks for all the post guys. The one I was looking at today was a bust too. I found another clean one that looked awsome, but the miles were just under 100K. I'm going to hold out for something a tad younger.

The market seems dry right now for the years I'm looking I hope something comes up in the next few months.

I also found a ford racing intake manifold from summit racing for under $200. It still sounded like it had plastic in it, but it would be a cheap fix. I'm not looking for anything heavly modded. I just finished one car project, and I just want something simple (close to stock) to drive during the week.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 16, 2006
#20
  • Mar 16, 2006
  • #20
gvr4ever said:
Thanks for all the post guys. The one I was looking at today was a bust too. I found another clean one that looked awsome, but the miles were just under 100K. I'm going to hold out for something a tad younger.

The market seems dry right now for the years I'm looking I hope something comes up in the next few months.

I also found a ford racing intake manifold from summit racing for under $200. It still sounded like it had plastic in it, but it would be a cheap fix. I'm not looking for anything heavly modded. I just finished one car project, and I just want something simple (close to stock) to drive during the week.
Click to expand...
That intake is just a stock mustang intake. Now there is a Ford Racing aluminum intake but it costs @ 1800 so i know thats not it just by the price.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
129
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
813
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
S
07 v6 4.0 wiring issue .In desperate need of help.
  • Staycstang
  • Sep 19, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
1
Views
307
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Sep 19, 2025
Noobz347
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
139
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
590
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?