• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

And the experiment begins...

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmajorboner
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
First Prev 9 of 9
J

jmajorboner

New Member
Dec 14, 2004
64
0
0
Oct 27, 2005
#161
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #161
PhatDoggy said:
So you stuck a cork in the intake (the unpowered leaf blower - you did say it's a major PITA to remove), dyno'd it with it off, then turned it on and picked up power? Big surprise. And your friend/SOTP test... same thing. You put a restriction in the intake tube, car was slower. You turned on the leaf blower and it was faster. Wow! And if you tell me the leaf blower flows air just like stock when it's turned off, I'll tell you to prove it, because I guarantee you're wrong.

You could have saved $200, stuck your pecker in the intake tube, dyno'd it, removed your pecker, and picked up 10 hp. Then everyone would put their peckers in the intake tube to pick up 10 hp.


Why the hell am I even posting here??? I'll go away for another few years.
Click to expand...
You think I haven't dynoed my car before? ****tard I put down 216 and 215 when I first got my car dynoed in the heat on summer. Ask next time.
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Oct 27, 2005
#162
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #162
How about all the flaming stops here. The guy performed an experment on his Mustang. What's the big deal?


Just try making fun of me when I hook up an intercooled snow blower to my GT this winter.
 

PhatDoggy

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
154
0
0
West Chicago, IL
Oct 27, 2005
#163
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #163
jmajorboner said:
You think I haven't dynoed my car before? ****tard=I put down 216 and 215 when I first got my car dynoed in the heat on summer. Ask next time.
Click to expand...
OK... I'll be a little more mature than you and avoid calling you names.

You went to the dyno "in the heat on(sic) the summer", so you acknowledge that your results would have been less then than they would be now. Most would agree that your results now should be greater than they were then since it is (assumed) cooler now. So, tack on 5-10 hp to your 215 and you'd be at 225 hp. Fast forward to your latest play day. You stuck the cork in, turned out 215 hp (should have been more since it's cooler now, right?), turned your hair dryer on, and made 225 hp - right around what you should have made with a stock car. I believe my line of reasoning still makes sense.

Also, Brothers has a Dynojet, per their website. Your car should have put down 225 hp STOCK before you put the hair dryer on. I've yet to see a manual trans PI headed car when properly run on a Dynojet make less than 225 hp. I fail to see an improvement.

mrvax (howdy, BTW) ... I wouldn't shame the scientific community by calling this an experiment. There was absolutely no control. This was merely playtime with a Lewinsky (suck/blow - it's what we call a leaf blower) that proved nothing more than a fan, when off, reduces power and restores it when you turn the fan back on. Glad this is "talk" and not "tech".
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Oct 27, 2005
#164
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #164
Hey Keith, I call it a young person tinkering. It's pretty interesting attempting to force more air into the engine w/o using conventional blowers. Live and learn. If I did not know (from reading it here) the CFM of the leaf blower I'd have guessed it may help.

When I use a leaf blower around the yard, it sure feels like a tornado (another wonderful invention). But if the leaf blower really only pushes 350cfm, that usually about what a 4 banger draws at WOT.
 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Oct 27, 2005
#165
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #165
What if you put a Turbonator INSIDE the leaf blower, thus creating the "Vortex" they advertise? more CFM?
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Oct 27, 2005
#166
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #166
One other thing you have to keep in mind when using an electric blower [as opposed to the one they used in the vid] is the added drag the alternator is going to cause by having to power the 110 volt converter in order to power the leaf blower.
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Oct 27, 2005
#167
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #167
This thread makes me want a
 

squares98

Member
Aug 20, 2004
852
0
17
Orange,ca
Oct 27, 2005
#168
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #168
I first heard about leafblower and tornados back in 99, and the only guys doing it were the guys in 80's honda civic's. I thought it was stupid then, but the fact that some people are nieve enough to think they can step around physics and then try to defend their actions, after its been proven many times to be worthless.
 

Sid3ways S13

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 28, 2004
60
0
6
NW Ohio (Swanton)
Oct 27, 2005
#169
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #169
PhatDoggy said:
So you stuck a cork in the intake (the unpowered leaf blower - you did say it's a major PITA to remove), dyno'd it with it off, then turned it on and picked up power? Big surprise. And your friend/SOTP test... same thing. You put a restriction in the intake tube, car was slower. You turned on the leaf blower and it was faster. Wow! And if you tell me the leaf blower flows air just like stock when it's turned off, I'll tell you to prove it, because I guarantee you're wrong.

You could have saved $200, stuck your pecker in the intake tube, dyno'd it, removed your pecker, and picked up 10 hp. Then everyone would put their peckers in the intake tube to pick up 10 hp.


Why the hell am I even posting here??? I'll go away for another few years.
Click to expand...

 

DogVomit

Member
Jun 9, 2005
192
1
19
Tampa, FL
Oct 27, 2005
#170
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #170
Stop making fun and let's get down to business...

How much for my girls blow drier.
She's blown me out of the bathroom before with it. Oh YES, TRUST ME, I KNOW!

Kidding.

Personally, I think it's the weight of the converter. I think extension cords would reduce the weight. Damn near reminds me of an old episode of the Beverly Hillbilly's, where Jefroe bought a electric car... Damn, gave my age away!

Shhhhhhhhhh!
 
S

silver4.6

Founding Member
Apr 11, 2001
514
0
16
In a little concrete bunker.
Oct 30, 2005
#171
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #171
Just add one of these for some mad torque!!!!!

Mad Torque Yo!!!
 

topless98gt

Adhesive Feces
Mar 31, 2005
182
0
17
Arlington, TX
Mar 27, 2006
#172
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #172
Back from the dead. Muahahaha.
 

Barrier

New Member
May 11, 2005
155
0
0
Mar 27, 2006
#173
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #173
Irony of the situation: His GT is totaled now... couldn't handle the "****ty 4.6 no power ****"
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Mar 27, 2006
#174
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #174
Barrier said:
Irony of the situation: His GT is totaled now... couldn't handle the "****ty 4.6 no power ****"
Click to expand...


thats priceless
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 27, 2006
#175
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #175
all that boost just made the car WAY too fast for him to handle i guess.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 27, 2006
#176
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #176
oh good i thought boner was back.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Mar 27, 2006
#177
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #177
wow, this thread brings back memories....

i figured he would try a quad leaf blower setup. running off the alternator no less.
 

blacknblue2002

Member
Jul 3, 2005
159
2
18
Va Beach, Va
Mar 27, 2006
#178
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #178
Now that I just went through 8 pages of this...I'd swear....wait....yess...i have definately lost more brain cells than I did this past weekend
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
First Prev 9 of 9
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Splitter for Saleen front valence?
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
131
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 3, 2026
Noobz347
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
108
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
97
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
Flop top talk
  • unknlgnd
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
126
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2025
unknlgnd
M
a Pro-M EFI system
  • maximilian macdoanald
  • Feb 6, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
7
Views
531
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 5, 2026
X-cam34
X
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?