• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

available stroker kits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 97predator
  • Start date Start date Dec 19, 2003
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
Dec 19, 2003
#1
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #1
i have found a few by searching this forum, modular ford powerhouse, vtengines, SHM, but what are some of the other companies who make forged shortblocks/strokers for the 4.6L? I am comparing prices and quality, as well as displacement. I have a 97 Cougar XR7 currently and am debating whether to drop a stroker in it or switch to a mustang. Either way the stroker goes in, just dont knwo which car yet. Thanks.
 

VETKILR

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2002
441
0
0
Dec 19, 2003
#2
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #2
97predator said:
i have found a few by searching this forum, modular ford powerhouse, vtengines, SHM, but what are some of the other companies who make forged shortblocks/strokers for the 4.6L? I am comparing prices and quality, as well as displacement. I have a 97 Cougar XR7 currently and am debating whether to drop a stroker in it or switch to a mustang. Either way the stroker goes in, just dont knwo which car yet. Thanks.
Click to expand...


Im doin the same:
www.powerheads.com
www.houstonperformance.com
www.vtengines.com
The above use similiar kits and have similiar prices with Houstonperformance being a little better on pricing(sorry Scott).
Then if you want the strongest ModMax offers one with a billet crank.
www.foxlakeracing.com (I believe that is the site) They use ModMax Stroker kit.

Im talking to another company now too see if he will do me a good deal on a Stroker Kit.

Most of the companys use the same rods and crank,except ModMax.
The difference is the pistons:
Powerheads uses Manley to make thiers.
Houstonperformance uses JE to make thiers.
Vtengines uses CP I believe or JE cant remember.
Foxlake use the ModMax kit.
The other company Im talking to will use Any kit I want.
 
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
Dec 19, 2003
#3
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #3
http://www.prewittracing.com/5_1l_stroker.htm

this looks interesting
 

snkypete

Founding Member
Mar 1, 2001
1,299
0
0
NY
Dec 21, 2003
#4
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #4
VT uses CP pistons now. I'll let Scott get into the details, but he and Jim say the pistons are much better than other choices.

I thought Powerheads uses a different crank? Could be wrong though...
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Dec 21, 2003
#5
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #5
To my knowledge, we are the only company that does not require an oil support rail. Our kit was designed from the ground up to offer 100% reliability, with no oiling issues. Traditional strokers have been known to have oil consumption issues due to the wrist pin interfering with the oil control ring. Our billet kit utilizes Oliver billet rods. Oliver manufactures some of the highest quality components in the business. Diamond and CP are 2 of the best pistons for modular engines IMHO. CP makes our pistons custom to our specs.
 

VETKILR

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2002
441
0
0
Dec 21, 2003
#6
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #6
97predator said:
http://www.prewittracing.com/5_1l_stroker.htm

this looks interesting
Click to expand...

I wouldnt go with them,if you read the small print there are core fees and if you want a new block they add 450 more.
Then they use Probe pistons ........POS
Cheaper Rods.

All in all you get less for the same money.And then what about customer service.......You know Scott will be here
 

VETKILR

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2002
441
0
0
Dec 21, 2003
#7
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #7
snkypete said:
VT uses CP pistons now. I'll let Scott get into the details, but he and Jim say the pistons are much better than other choices.

I thought Powerheads uses a different crank? Could be wrong though...
Click to expand...


Both Powerheads and HP use a Kellogg crank.

HP has been making them for a while and uses Custom JE pistons made to thier specs.

Powerheads just starting making them,they are on thier 5th motor and havent started testing(well maybe they did yesterday).So you have to think about do they have thier stuff together and di he engineer it right.They had Manley make them some Custom pisons that he said are beefier then the CPs that he sent in to them for reference.?????
 

VETKILR

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2002
441
0
0
Dec 21, 2003
#8
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #8
VTEngine said:
To my knowledge, we are the only company that does not require an oil support rail. Our kit was designed from the ground up to offer 100% reliability, with no oiling issues. Traditional strokers have been known to have oil consumption issues due to the wrist pin interfering with the oil control ring. Our billet kit utilizes Oliver billet rods. Oliver manufactures some of the highest quality components in the business. Diamond and CP are 2 of the best pistons for modular engines IMHO. CP makes our pistons custom to our specs.
Click to expand...

Scott niether one of them needs a oil support rail because they said the wrist pin is not interferring with the oil control ring.

Powerheads has yet to be proven,so they are up in the air as to if they have a properly engineerd system.

Steve at HP has made over 30 of them and said no issues and I know a couple of people that have them(thru the boards) and they have said no issues out of thiers yet.

I would agree with both your Pistons and Rods of being the top ones that have been proven to be a quality pieces and strong ones at that.

Im leaning towards Scott myself if I go the Stroker route even if he is a little higher than some :canflag:
 

stallion98gt

New Member
May 12, 2003
1,802
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Dec 21, 2003
#9
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #9
CHP, coast high performance, here in southern california is another one:

http://www.coasthigh.com/Assemblies/Ford/ford_5_1.htm
 

snkypete

Founding Member
Mar 1, 2001
1,299
0
0
NY
Dec 21, 2003
#10
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #10
One thing I have learned over the years.....

There are times to save a few bucks, there are times not to....sometimes customer service and better parts are worth a few extra dollars.

Just my $.02
 

VETKILR

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2002
441
0
0
Dec 22, 2003
#11
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #11
snkypete said:
One thing I have learned over the years.....

There are times to save a few bucks, there are times not to....sometimes customer service and better parts are worth a few extra dollars.

Just my $.02
Click to expand...


TRUE................TRUE
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
A force divided (opinions on SC vs stroker)
  • zombiebrew
  • Oct 7, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 11, 2011
NIKwoaC
B
  • Locked
Expired 00/03 Cobra Clone Fully Built Street/track Monster Kenne Bell
  • BOSS GT
  • Aug 20, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
4
Views
12K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 29, 2013
BOSS GT
B
Would like some info on stroker kits
  • Preston951
  • Jun 9, 2009
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
7K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 14, 2009
Preston951
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?