• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Back from the track... And now in the 12 sec club!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xcessiv
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 2 of 12 Next Last

ToplessStang

Member
Mar 7, 2004
591
0
17
Montreal, Canada
Sep 11, 2005
#21
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #21
I believe the times, I don't believe the mods list. Incomplete.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#22
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #22
SWRTstang said:
105 mph on a bone stock '01 GT

You claim to have ran on both lanes so show us a different timeslip.

Until then
Click to expand...
Nope, 105.X mph with the same actual mods... Yesterday I was just much better at shifthing and weather was perfect.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 11, 2005
#23
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #23
Guys, if he were to come down to the south where humidity is high and its HOT, he would trap the usual 100-101 with those mods. Canada has a high pressure over it, and it will be nice and cool. Good weather has a HUGE impact on trap.
 

blackink00

I missed a shift & stole Curt's money.
Mar 30, 2005
545
0
0
Tempe, AZ
Sep 11, 2005
#24
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #24
thats to high im calling a
 

flames201

New Member
Dec 23, 2004
77
0
0
st. amant, la
Sep 11, 2005
#25
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #25
great times man!!! i wish i could get up there to make a few passes. i might get in the 11.9-12.2 range up there.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#26
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #26
hotmustang331 said:
Guys, if he were to come down to the south where humidity is high and its HOT, he would trap the usual 100-101 with those mods. Canada has a high pressure over it, and it will be nice and cool. Good weather has a HUGE impact on trap.
Click to expand...
Does a stock LS1 trap 97 mph down to the south?
What about a stock '99-04 GT? 92 mph?

The same day, they were trapping 103-104 mph and 98-99 mph here...

 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#27
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #27
ToplessStang said:
I believe the times, I don't believe the mods list. Incomplete.
Click to expand...
Sorry, I forgot about my MAC hot air intake.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 11, 2005
#28
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #28
Wait a sec, are you saying the LS1s were trapping 103-104? they have 300RWHP from the factory and were trapping 105-107 when i ran. 2 T/As in a row trapped 105...then one came back later and pulled a 107. I doubt they were stock, but anyways BOTTOM line is that any LS1 F body auto or M6 will out trap you with your current mods. There is no doubt, unless the guy is a 13 year old kid driving lol. The 2V cant surpass the power an LS1 makes unless it is cammed with FULL boltons. the trap will reflect this...im not even trapping what the M6 f bodys here are (bout 1-2MPH lower). Basically, if your out trapping all the F bodys, you have 290+RWHP AT THE VERY LEAST...since your running at full weight. You have cams at the VERY least.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#29
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #29
hotmustang331 said:
Wait a sec, are you saying the LS1s were trapping 103-104? they have 300RWHP from the factory and were trapping 105-107 when i ran. 2 T/As in a row trapped 105...then one came back later and pulled a 107. I doubt they were stock, but anyways BOTTOM line is that any LS1 F body auto or M6 will out trap you with your current mods. There is no doubt, unless the guy is a 13 year old kid driving lol. The 2V cant surpass the power an LS1 makes unless it is cammed with FULL boltons. the trap will reflect this...im not even trapping what the M6 f bodys here are (bout 1-2MPH lower). Basically, if your out trapping all the F bodys, you have 290+RWHP AT THE VERY LEAST...since your running at full weight. You have cams at the VERY least.
Click to expand...
Well... At the track, one of the LS1 Trans Ams surprisingly kept up pretty good on the launch but I clearly pulled on him above 80 mph.

The same results occur on the street, in fact they often outlaunch me and I gain back above 60 mph. I'm not saying that I'd beat any well driven LS1 but until now the 2V shined...
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 11, 2005
#30
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #30
LOL, yep you have other work done. The LS1 shines above 70MPH and will pull ANY full bolton GT up there, much less one with a few boltons like you. Driving has nothing do do with that. Shiftpoints can help, but the LS1 will be pulling. There is no such thing as a "freak" GT, they all make roughly the same HP. See we have been doing this game for a while, this stuff just doesnt happen W/O ALOT, and I mean ALOT of work. You will probably get a flaming from all the F body guys on here in a few lol, many have owned both cars. It takes more than boltons to out trap teh LS1.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#31
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #31
hotmustang331 said:
LOL, yep you have other work done. The LS1 shines above 70MPH and will pull ANY full bolton GT up there, much less one with a few boltons like you. Driving has nothing do do with that. Shiftpoints can help, but the LS1 will be pulling. There is no such thing as a "freak" GT, they all make roughly the same HP. See we have been doing this game for a while, this stuff just doesnt happen W/O ALOT, and I mean ALOT of work. You will probably get a flaming from all the F body guys on here in a few lol, many have owned both cars. It takes more than boltons to out trap teh LS1.
Click to expand...
I'll videotape a 40-110 mph race against my friend's LS1, I'll keep ya guys updated.
 
9

97gtblue

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
283
0
0
pensacola,florida
Sep 11, 2005
#32
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #32
too many people in here like to argue,so if i was you i wouldnt even talk about it on here,cause no one in here belives anything anyone else says unless it actually their car doing it.. ive had the same problem just ignore all them know it alls in here
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 11, 2005
#33
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #33
Cool, i would love to see that. Be sure to take a small vid of your idle.
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#34
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #34
97gtblue said:
too many people in here like to argue,so if i was you i wouldnt even talk about it on here,cause no one in here belives anything anyone else says unless it actually their car doing it.. ive had the same problem just ignore all them know it alls in here
Click to expand...
I agree...
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 11, 2005
#35
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #35
Its hard to believe when youve been around this game for a while, as well as countless other, and have seen MANY GTs run, and seen MANY posts on Ets/trap vs mods vs dyno data. This is not just "not typical", it does NOT happen....or should I say, its never happened lol. Newb.....(97)
 
X

Xcessiv

Member
Jul 16, 2004
187
0
16
Sep 11, 2005
#36
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #36
hotmustang331 said:
Cool, i would love to see that. Be sure to take a small vid of your idle.
Click to expand...
Here's a teaser of a previous video... Video

Both races from 30 to 110 mph...

Civic mods: H22A, chip, full exhaust, alot of weight reduction, intake... A 104.X mph car.

SRT-4 mods: Stage II, full exhaust, mbc @ 21-22 PSI... A 107+ mph car.

The SRT-4 owner has no problem with stock LS1 powered cars...
 
9

97gtblue

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
283
0
0
pensacola,florida
Sep 11, 2005
#37
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #37
dang that mustang is pretty quick,them srt4 with the turbo upgrade are pretty quick i thought
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 12, 2005
#38
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #38
Just watched vid, and good job...but unfortunatly im at work so no sound lol. Look, im not saying that your car isnt that fast, what im saying is that your car isnt that fast with those mods listed, simple as that. This has happened before, where a guy wont list all the mods and tried to pass of insane times and RWHP #s with only boltons. (280RWHP aND LOW 13S @ 105-106) I called BS, and he stuck to his story (know this guy personally) 100%. Now he is getting a different setup, and finally admitted that he had cams...where before he specifically told me that cams sucked and we worthless and he didnt have any. Im not saying that you are doing this, but there is more than boltons on that GT...which the previous owner could have very well done (ported heads, custom cams...some people are headwork buffs and will do those things first). And can I ask what RPM your shifting at? Please dont take my BS calling personally lol, but you have to understand where im coming from. That stg 2 for example has approx 260+RWHP and 300RWTQ and is a few hundered lbs lighter than you....IMO if you get your car dynoed you will be looking at 290ish RWHP. DO that and that will put everything to rest.
 
J

::Jongo::

New Member
Aug 18, 2005
32
0
0
Sep 12, 2005
#39
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #39
i simply think your full of **** -- I wont sugar coat it... vid shows nothing except you street race which is even more stupid then me arguing with you about your times. my guess is your 18 yrs old and just want people to see your video and tell you how big your nuts are now because u have a mustang ....
 

cobra2798

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
303
2
0
Clermont, Florida
Sep 12, 2005
#40
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #40
A 12.96 in that car is 100% excellent driver! Good job
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 2 of 12 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1st Track outing
  • Stanley Bullock
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
892
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2012
Stanley Bullock
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Nearly stock 97 looking for Drag pointers
  • Colorshow
  • Jul 6, 2011
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
1K
SVT Tech Forum Jul 12, 2011
Sharad
  • Locked
Expired 1989 Mustang Coupe, 351w, $6,500, West Tn
  • thehueypilot
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
9
Views
25K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 27, 2013
thehueypilot
Finally Got Back to the Track; HD vids!
  • sneaky98gt
  • Feb 21, 2011
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 24, 2011
Rejekt
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?