• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

BBK 4.6 2V intake set for production

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pwr_by_FORD
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Pwr_by_FORD

New Member
Jul 1, 2003
62
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 22, 2004
#1
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #1
Just read through the March issue of 5.0 mustangs & FF. There's an article titled "early warning" about new BBK performance parts(page 130-137).

BBK says that they will release an all aluminum 4.6L intake, similar to their newest 5.0L intake in the summer of '04. The preliminary price is set at $599.

Don't know if this is old news or not, but I think that it's great to see another intake that will compete with the Fox Lake P-51, at 1/2 the price

Hopefully this will mean more affordable intakes in the near future
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Jan 22, 2004
#2
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #2
sweet, i'll have to go get it from upstairs & read up on that
 

road rage

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
433
0
0
R.I.
Jan 22, 2004
#3
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #3
Yeah the p-51 is way to expensive
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jan 22, 2004
#4
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #4
I hope this happens. I would love to do a cam and intake swap this summer.
 
D

DC-GT

New Member
Nov 25, 2003
312
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#5
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #5
Oh please hurry, lol. I would love to see more lower intakes out!
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Jan 22, 2004
#6
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #6
I remenber huge debate over price on intake, which i think was p-51. Nice i'm sure, but over 1000bucks is just insane. Now, 600 bucks, I'll do!
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Jan 22, 2004
#7
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #7
damn it,why does BBK have to do it. I hate BBK products. I hope its a higher quality than other BBK products I have dealt with.

600 dollars doenst seem too bad, lets just pray it actually performs.
 

Pwr_by_FORD

New Member
Jul 1, 2003
62
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 22, 2004
#8
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #8
damn it,why does BBK have to do it. I hate BBK products. I hope its a higher quality than other BBK products I have dealt with.
Click to expand...

Yea, they are not my first choice either...But if BBK manages to produce an intake that rivals the Fox Lake for 1/2 the cost, you will have to believe that other companies will follow suit and make more affordable intakes
 
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
Jan 22, 2004
#9
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #9
Pwr_by_FORD said:
Yea, they are not my first choice either...But if BBK manages to produce an intake that rivals the Fox Lake for 1/2 the cost, you will have to believe that other companies will follow suit and make more affordable intakes
Click to expand...
definitely. is there any truth to the rumor that C&L is working on one as well?
 
C

claytucc3

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
825
0
0
Santa Clarita, Ca
Jan 22, 2004
#10
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #10
IF I wasn't getting a Kenne Bell I would be pretty damn excited about it also. I have nothing but good luck and experiences with BBK which is also Edelbrock
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jan 22, 2004
#11
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #11
Wasn't the P-51 price so high partially because it included other necessary hardware like new fuel rails and such?
 

Pwr_by_FORD

New Member
Jul 1, 2003
62
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 22, 2004
#12
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #12
Originally posted by 97Predator
definitely. is there any truth to the rumor that C&L is working on one as well?
Click to expand...

All I have heard are rumors too


Originally posted by CatmanJJ
Wasn't the P-51 price so high partially because it included other necessary hardware like new fuel rails and such?
Click to expand...

The $1299 kit comes with fuel rails, gaskets and hardware.The bare Manifold is still $999. I don't know who would but just the manifold without the proper fuel rails and hardware???
 

PoXiC

New Member
Jul 31, 2003
147
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#13
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #13
I pray this becomes a trend. Maybe finaly the 4.6 aftermarket will start getting realistic.
 
T

TJs98GT

New Member
Jan 22, 2004
13
0
1
Lincoln Park
Jan 22, 2004
#14
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #14
sounds good to me, ill pick one up when i see it hit shelves and when i hear some more about it, including dyno graphs, match that with the accufab TB and plenum and ur talking probably a good 15-20 hp, is there articles about this online anywhere? im interested to see the design and if its gunna be a composite plastic material or some kind of metal
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jan 22, 2004
#15
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #15
this would kick so much ass!
 

LS2 KLR

Member
Apr 16, 2003
452
0
17
Houston, TX
Jan 22, 2004
#16
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #16
I'm really looking forward to buying one of the new intakes!
 

bowens99GT

Founding Member
Aug 27, 2002
655
0
0
On some dirt road in Arkansas
Jan 22, 2004
#17
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #17
whats the newer 5.0 one look like so we can look at something similar to what it'll be?
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
Jan 22, 2004
#18
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #18
As long as it looks better then the P-51. I personally like the look of the stock piece better.

I know the P-51 adds like 30hp but the looks suck. For $1000+ on an intake I want it too look like $1000. You know what I mean?
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Jan 22, 2004
#19
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #19
can someone scan the page from 5.0Mustang&FF?
 

TeriiK

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
186
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#20
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #20
WOT said:
As long as it looks better then the P-51. I personally like the look of the stock piece better.

I know the P-51 adds like 30hp but the looks suck. For $1000+ on an intake I want it too look like $1000. You know what I mean?
Click to expand...

who cares about looks. you race with the hood down.


god, if this is true, (PLEASE BE TRUE!!!) this'll change things, big time. Fox lake will have to get realistic on their pricing if they want to make their investment back. Man, if there is an affordable intake for us, this means all our other mods will start working that much better as well. TB's, CAI's, exhaust, nitrous puddling will be reduced....please be true!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
  • Locked
SOLD 2000 Ford Mustang Gt Nasa Cmc Racer Or Hpde
  • SPEED DETAILS
  • May 17, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 17, 2016
SPEED DETAILS
S
PI Headswap Write-Up
  • 5spd GT
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
67K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 4, 2020
Thomas Camp
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?