• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Best poll ever! Engine types in fox

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boss 351
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2011

Which engine best suits the fox...

  • Pushrod 5.0 (up to 347)

    Votes: 21 33.9%
  • Good 'ol 351 (up to 427)

    Votes: 19 30.6%
  • Mod motor (any 2v, 3v, 4v, etc...)

    Votes: 12 19.4%
  • LSx Chebby engines

    Votes: 4 6.5%
  • Rice 4 or 6 bangers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F gas prices, going electric

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Martha Stewart

    Votes: 6 9.7%

  • Total voters
    62
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 8
Next
1 of 8 Next Last
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Nov 9, 2011
#1
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #1
Where do we stand now. I used to think a Chebby in a fox was like a bikini on a fat chick... Now I'm not as "brand" loyal as I used to be and flirting with the idea of LS2 in the 86.

To be fair, my next engine won't be a windsor. I'm at the LS2 vs 32v Mod motor... But still dreaming at this point. My supercharged 302 will have to do until it splits in two.

[edit: dammit forgot the big block crowd, sorry. How can I edit a poll?]
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,109
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 9, 2011
#2
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #2
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Nov 9, 2011
#3
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #3
The poll failed because it isn't even a poll thread.


That being said, 2JZ Swap with NOS BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Edit: you ninja edited a poll back into it!
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Nov 9, 2011
#4
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #4
1991notchbackLX said:
The poll failed because it isn't even a poll thread.


That being said, 2JZ Swap with NOS BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Edit: you ninja edited a poll back into it!
Click to expand...

LOL, I guess the system posted before sending me to the poll? hahaha



NAAWWWWS
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,109
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 9, 2011
#5
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #5
High compression Cobra Jet.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Nov 9, 2011
#6
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #6
Those are all fine options if you're a pansy. I'm swapping a tank engine in mine.

 

Attachments

  • aa-tankengine-jpg_100175062_m.webp
    23 KB · Views: 153

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 9, 2011
#7
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #7
LSx or 351 stroker, The last few days ive been researching 700hp 427ish inch pump gas small blocks though, and it really makes me want to build a CFE headed SBC.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 9, 2011
#8
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #8
Ls2 or ls3 all the way
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Nov 9, 2011
#9
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #9
where is the proline 670 option???
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 9, 2011
#10
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #10
srtthis said:
where is the proline 670 option???
Click to expand...

Forget what i posted before, im with this guy!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 9, 2011
#11
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #11
I've always said that the Windsor and the Fox go together like fries and ketchup. It's just how the Fox was meant to be.

That said, my preference would go like this:
1. Anything 9.5 deck Windsor (including possibly a modern Clevor)
2. Aftermarket block 363+ ci 8.2 deck
3. Mod 5.4L
4. Coyote

If money was a non-issue, I'd seriously contemplate a BBF or finding a way to get the new Boss 6.2L to work.

An LS engine would be low on my list, but I would do that before a 4.6. The 4.6 just doesn't appeal to me at all.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 9, 2011
#12
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #12
NikwoaC said:
I've always said that the Windsor and the Fox go together like fries and ketchup. It's just how the Fox was meant to be.

That said, my preference would go like this:
1. Anything 9.5 deck Windsor (including possibly a modern Clevor)
2. Aftermarket block 363+ ci 8.2 deck
3. Mod 5.4L
4. Coyote

If money was a non-issue, I'd seriously contemplate a BBF or finding a way to get the new Boss 6.2L to work.

An LS engine would be low on my list, but I would do that before a 4.6. The 4.6 just doesn't appeal to me at all.
Click to expand...
You'd honestly do a 5.4 over a lsx, ford underwear aside?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 9, 2011
#13
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #13
Shaolin Crane said:
You'd honestly do a 5.4 over a lsx, ford underwear aside?
Click to expand...

Yep, I'm attracted to the OHC thing, but the 4.6 is too small to justify it. I'd like to do a 5.4 with all the bells and whistles, but it would probably get pretty salty.

I pretty much see the LS as in the same ballpark as the Windsor up until about 700 HP, when the Windsor block strength comes into question. Below that, stock block Windsor strokers are cheap enough and easy enough to install in a Fox that it's pretty much a wash when compared to a LS swap. If you can manage to find an LS in good shape for cheap, and all you're planning on doing is sticking a cam in it and then throwing it in a Fox with junkyard parts, sure... But if we're talking a legit 400-600 RWHP, it's a moot point.

I dunno though, if tomorrow you offered me $4000 and an LS2 to trade for my 302, I'd probably go for it. I respect the LS as a badass engine. I would just lean toward going with the Blue Oval, assuming no miracle deals fall in my lap any time soon.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 9, 2011
#14
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #14
NikwoaC said:
Yep, I'm attracted to the OHC thing, but the 4.6 is too small to justify it. I'd like to do a 5.4 with all the bells and whistles, but it would probably get pretty salty.

I pretty much see the LS as in the same ballpark as the Windsor up until about 700 HP, when the Windsor block strength comes into question. Below that, stock block Windsor strokers are cheap enough and easy enough to install in a Fox that it's pretty much a wash when compared to a LS swap. If you can manage to find an LS in good shape for cheap, and all you're planning on doing is sticking a cam in it and then throwing it in a Fox with junkyard parts, sure... But if we're talking a legit 400-600 RWHP, it's a moot point.

I dunno though, if tomorrow you offered me $4000 and an LS2 to trade for my 302, I'd probably go for it. I respect the LS as a badass engine. I would just lean toward going with the Blue Oval, assuming no miracle deals fall in my lap any time soon.
Click to expand...
There is so many portions of the ls swap that people dont think about, for the average 1320 skinny, it doesnt matter, for a turn burner or street car it does.

The weight of an LS is outstanding, even a ls7 weighs about what a stock 5.0l weighs, thats pretty badass. Go ahead and stuff a cam in it, but dont buy new heads, the heads can be hogged out something fierce, take it to any local engine shop and im sure there is some dude who has been building engines for years who can do a hand port job 10x what a machine can, for about a 1/3 of the cost.

I'll be the first to say good luck finding a running ls1/2/3 for under 2k, i found a ls7 with computer and harness for 4k, Di wish i had the cash to buy it? **** yeah, but it doesnt mean you cant find it, maybe its just me and im able to get great deals but i doubt it.

There are things the windsor just cant compete with, weight, location in the engine bay, reactivity to parts. Those are things i'd rather have, and if i had to pay a bit of a premium then so be it(but be damn sure im going to wait until i get a deal)

Plus i get the extra hatred factor, people see it and hate me for what I did, and that makes me extra fuzzy inside when i blow past them.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 9, 2011
#15
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #15
Shaolin Crane said:
take it to any local engine shop and im sure there is some dude who has been building engines for years who can do a hand port job 10x what a machine can, for about a 1/3 of the cost.
Click to expand...

You could send a set of heads to TEA or WCCH and be out of there for around 1300 bucks, they will do the bowls, chambers, and runners. A local, small guy would have to do it for under 500 bucks according to your math and if he did, he would be loosing money, and run himself straight into the ground.
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Nov 9, 2011
#16
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #16
There was a ls local to me for 1800, complete with wiring and all.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 9, 2011
#17
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #17
90lxcoupe said:
You could send a set of heads to TEA or WCCH and be out of there for around 1300 bucks, they will do the bowls, chambers, and runners. A local, small guy would have to do it for under 500 bucks according to your math and if he did, he would be loosing money, and run himself straight into the ground.
Click to expand...

Did you see the port work in both my threads? That cost me $300 per set, (compared to $400 for his regular price), they've been their for 44 years and the building is paid for. Im sure this is on the lowest range. This port included everything, pocket, bowl work, smoothing, decking everything. And it doesnt matter what head or how much he opens it up.

Less incorporated areas might not get anywhere near that, but big cities have a better shot.

Btw it took about 2 days for both sets to be finished, if you want to see pics bump my threads and i'll find more.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 9, 2011
#18
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #18
Shaolin Crane said:
The weight of an LS is outstanding, even a ls7 weighs about what a stock 5.0l weighs, thats pretty badass.
Click to expand...

The weight is definitely nice, but then we're talking aluminum block LS engines, which are much weaker than their iron counterparts. From what I've read, the aluminum block LS stuff is back in Windsor strength territory.

Except for the LS7, I have no idea what that block can do.

Shaolin Crane said:
Go ahead and stuff a cam in it, but dont buy new heads, the heads can be hogged out something fierce, take it to any local engine shop and im sure there is some dude who has been building engines for years who can do a hand port job 10x what a machine can, for about a 1/3 of the cost.
Click to expand...

HAHAHA, keep telling yourself that, dude. Any hand port job that can even come close to competing with some of the modern CNC stuff is going to cost you HUGE coin. Places like TEA and Fox Lake spend years developing those CNC profiles, and the whole idea behind the CNC is that you can do it faster and cheaper. Even the big money guys will usually have a head CNC ported, THEN add some finishing touches by hand.

I agree though, LS heads + reputable CNC porting = awesomeness.

Shaolin Crane said:
I'll be the first to say good luck finding a running ls1/2/3 for under 2k, i found a ls7 with computer and harness for 4k, Di wish i had the cash to buy it? **** yeah, but it doesnt mean you cant find it, maybe its just me and im able to get great deals but i doubt it.
Click to expand...

So, what was wrong with it? That is a ridiculously good deal. Most guys are going to want 2 or 3 times as much for a LS7.

Shaolin Crane said:
There are things the windsor just cant compete with, weight, location in the engine bay, reactivity to parts.
Click to expand...

The LS doesn't just magically respond well to any modifications, it's just that it has a little more modern aftermarket following to it, with more modern parts and thinking. NA Windsors can still be built to do everything a built LS can do, but the Windsor is definitely going to take a little more thought, because the SBF market is still flooded with outdated parts and hot-rodding methods. If you put a common 250CFM head, 75mm TB and .500" lift flat tappet cam on a Windsor, of course an LS with 320CFM heads, a 90mm TB, and a .600" lift roller cam is going to run circles around it. Put those kind of parts on a Windsor though, and the playing field becomes a little more level.


Shaolin Crane said:
Plus i get the extra hatred factor, people see it and hate me for what I did, and that makes me extra fuzzy inside when i blow past them.
Click to expand...

Haha, you're sadistic, dude.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 9, 2011
#19
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #19
NikwoaC said:
The weight is definitely nice, but then we're talking aluminum block LS engines, which are much weaker than their iron counterparts. From what I've read, the aluminum block LS stuff is back in Windsor strength territory.

Except for the LS7, I have no idea what that block can do.

great, so an aluminum block with iron stength, spells win to me. We'll keep the comparisons to n/a from here out for simplicity, work for you?

HAHAHA, keep telling yourself that, dude. Any hand port job that can even come close to competing with some of the modern CNC stuff is going to cost you HUGE coin. Places like TEA and Fox Lake spend years developing those CNC profiles, and the whole idea behind the CNC is that you can do it faster and cheaper. Even the big money guys will usually have a head CNC ported, THEN add some finishing touches by hand.

I agree though, LS heads + reputable CNC porting = awesomeness.

its true, they have to pay for the cnc machine some how, it was designed to do it faster, not surely better, washing machines wash clothes faster and easier but a hand wash is always better. I know, im special and accomplish stuff for prices unattainable but i doubt hes the only builder who does the same

So, what was wrong with it? That is a ridiculously good deal. Most guys are going to want 2 or 3 times as much for a LS7.

FOF sort of a thing, came out of a running car, just couldnt sell my 347 in time. I missed out big time, but i have no issue going ls3 if i can get a deal

The LS doesn't just magically respond well to any modifications, it's just that it has a little more modern aftermarket following to it, with more modern parts and thinking. NA Windsors can still be built to do everything a built LS can do, but the Windsor is definitely going to take a little more thought, because the SBF market is still flooded with outdated parts and hot-rodding methods. If you put a common 250CFM head, 75mm TB and .500" lift flat tappet cam on a Windsor, of course an LS with 320CFM heads, a 90mm TB, and a .600" lift roller cam is going to run circles around it. Put those kind of parts on a Windsor though, and the playing field becomes a little more level.
im not talking about aftermarket reactivity, the motor isnt magic, it was touched by god, get it right I'm talking about using factory components and modding them to do great things without buying expensive aftermarket parts. Add the fact that all ls engines are really interchangeable with each other, port the heads, different factory intake, old take out cam and they do great things for nickles comparitvely



Haha, you're sadistic, dude.
Click to expand...
very very sadistic
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 9, 2011
#20
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #20
Shaolin Crane said:
Did you see the port work in both my threads? That cost me $300 per set, (compared to $400 for his regular price), they've been their for 44 years and the building is paid for. Im sure this is on the lowest range. This port included everything, pocket, bowl work, smoothing, decking everything. And it doesnt matter what head or how much he opens it up.

Less incorporated areas might not get anywhere near that, but big cities have a better shot.

Btw it took about 2 days for both sets to be finished, if you want to see pics bump my threads and i'll find more.
Click to expand...

No i didnt, what do they flow? If you paid that much, you got a deal, 99.5% of people could not do it for that cheap.

Another great advantage is that the CNC stuff is repeatable for all 8 cylinders. Alot of shops have stopped hand porting heads because its not smart anymore. Like Nik said, theses companies have years of development behind these programs, the best heads are the ones that are roughed out on the CNC, then then hand ported to finish. 10 years ago if you wanted a head that flowed 320 CFM, you were paying at least 3500 bucks for it. Now, 1900, out the door with one call to summit.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 8
Next
1 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brakes 1979-1986 Fox Parking Brake Adjustment
  • LiquidStangs
  • Sep 22, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 23, 2019
LX Dave
5 lug conversion..best write up ever!
  • ryan218
  • Aug 7, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2007
Mustang5L5
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Lets make fun of some cars
  • crushnut
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2004
StangDreamin'
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?