• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Best poll ever! Engine types in fox

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boss 351
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2011

Which engine best suits the fox...

  • Pushrod 5.0 (up to 347)

    Votes: 21 33.9%
  • Good 'ol 351 (up to 427)

    Votes: 19 30.6%
  • Mod motor (any 2v, 3v, 4v, etc...)

    Votes: 12 19.4%
  • LSx Chebby engines

    Votes: 4 6.5%
  • Rice 4 or 6 bangers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F gas prices, going electric

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Martha Stewart

    Votes: 6 9.7%

  • Total voters
    62
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 6 of 8 Next Last

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#101
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #101
Pur Pony said:
if you want a POS chevy motor, sell you mustang and buy a camaro....

I have never been a fan of the mod motors... i love my good old ford pushrod..... If i was to do anything other then that, it would probably be a new '11 5.0
Click to expand...

Its cheaper to just put one in my mustang. That way i have a great car with a great engine.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Nov 22, 2011
#102
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #102
Shaolin Crane said:
Its cheaper to just put one in my mustang. That way i have a great car with a great engine.
Click to expand...

***kin troll
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#103
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #103
How else will i get people to hate my car?
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,779
6,933
214
SW Houston
Nov 22, 2011
#104
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #104
I just read the whole thread. Very interesting. The LSx arguments are hard to pass up. My buddy does LS swaps into old muscle cars and buys motor/harness/computer ls1s and 3s between 2500 and 4000 depending on what it came out of/ how many miles it has. I still refuse to do it even after helping him build a 420 rwhp Chevy II that weighs a lot less than my notch. It has run a best of 12.0 spinning, forgot mph.

With that said, it hurts me to admit that I am just over $5k into my 408 and the list of parts needed is still long. How easily could I have succumbed to peer pressure (believe me, there was lots) and just dropped in a LS that was sitting on a pallet in the corner? Hind sight - 20/20, gents.

"Best suited engine" boils down to personal preference, unfortunately. The only reason Im building the big W is because I thought I could afford it at the time and now Im in too far to turn back (no regrets though). Also thought I could prove that I could build more power, cheaper than the Chevy II. We'll see what happens at the track though.

I still get a chub when reading about other mild 408 builds like mine clicking off 10.50s and then driving home. I can hardly contain myself, as soon as I get back from this crap-arse job in Alaska, Im gonna get after it and get this FE-AL amalgamation to live. Helloooo torque!

- Collin
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 22, 2011
#105
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #105
fiveohwblow said:
WTF Nik???
Click to expand...

There's no denying that the LS is a sweet motor. It's basically Windsor-like durability with an aluminum block, or Dart-block durability with the stock iron castings. Considering they were/are also available from the factory with more displacement, they're a pretty logical choice for a hot rodder.

Don't get me wrong, I still bleed Ford blue, but the LS is high on my list of engines that I would love to own someday. It's up there with the Flathead Ford, BBF, and pretty much any piston-driven aviation engine from WWII, haha.

My '86 will likely never see anything but Ford pushrod goodness, but that's not to say I won't ever own a different car with an LS in it.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#106
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #106
NikwoaC said:
There's no denying that the LS is a sweet motor. It's basically Windsor-like durability with an aluminum block, or Dart-block durability with the stock iron castings. Considering they were/are also available from the factory with more displacement, they're a pretty logical choice for a hot rodder.

Don't get me wrong, I still bleed Ford blue, but the LS is high on my list of engines that I would love to own someday. It's up there with the Flathead Ford, BBF, and pretty much any piston-driven aviation engine from WWII, haha.

My '86 will likely never see anything but Ford pushrod goodness, but that's not to say I won't ever own a different car with an LS in it.
Click to expand...
Me thinks corvette...
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 22, 2011
#107
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #107
Corvettes are over rated.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 22, 2011
#108
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #108
90lxcoupe said:
Corvettes are over rated.
Click to expand...

Truth.

My next car is going to be something unique and obscure. Something that you don't see every day (like Mustangs and Corvettes, haha).
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Nov 22, 2011
#109
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #109
90lxcoupe said:
Corvettes are over rated.
Click to expand...

This. It destroys me to see guys time and time again think the ls is something from the heavens. Engines are air pumps folks. Let me put this in a comprible terms for you to understand...Ls motors are 351 with trick flows already installed with aluminum blocks.... THERE IS NO SECRETS TO PUSHROD ENGINES, especially in factory ones. It's a relative combination of compression, airflow, cam spec and stroke. Bam.

The ONLY SINGLE advantage to an ls is that it is aluminum. That's it. The ford 4.6's can handle 1,000 plus Hp with different internals.

It just ***king Kills me to see people think Chevy has figured a magic trick out. It's just buying horsepower for cheaper, not building it. PERIOD.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#110
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #110
90lxcoupe said:
Corvettes are over rated.
Click to expand...
Still got those marks in your driveway?
NikwoaC said:
Truth.

My next car is going to be something unique and obscure. Something that you don't see every day (like Mustangs and Corvettes, haha).
Click to expand...

like a supra?

I like vettes, i'd love to build one to thrash on a road course. If i like i car i dont care if its over rated or if everyone has one, **** if i did, i wouldnt own a mustang(s)
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#111
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #111
fiveohwblow said:
This. It destroys me to see guys time and time again think the ls is something from the heavens. Engines are air pumps folks. Let me put this in a comprible terms for you to understand...Ls motors are 351 with trick flows already installed with aluminum blocks.... THERE IS NO SECRETS TO PUSHROD ENGINES, especially in factory ones. It's a relative combination of compression, airflow, cam spec and stroke. Bam.

The ONLY SINGLE advantage to an ls is that it is aluminum. That's it. The ford 4.6's can handle 1,000 plus Hp with different internals.

It just ***king Kills me to see people think Chevy has figured a magic trick out. It's just buying horsepower for cheaper, not building it. PERIOD.
Click to expand...
Its more then aluminum, its also size, a 4.6 is the size of a ****ing big block, and has that POS OHC goin on.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Nov 22, 2011
#112
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #112
Shaolin Crane said:
Its more then aluminum, its also size, a 4.6 is the size of a ****ing big block, and has that POS OHC goin on.
Click to expand...

When I put it in relative terms I used the 351. I understand they always use big displacement. Most guys aren't after 4 digit power and 700 will suffice which is the avg limit of the 351. So again, for the average guy, it's just buying instead of building.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#113
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #113
fiveohwblow said:
When I put it in relative terms I used the 351. I understand they always use big displacement. Most guys aren't after 4 digit power and 700 will suffice which is the avg limit of the 351. So again, for the average guy, it's just buying instead of building.
Click to expand...

Not always the case again, I know for my use, a ford plant will never do what an LSx can. Unless i want to dump 6k on just the block, which im not down for. So i'll run a ls motor and be happy as a clam. Engine doesnt bother me, its a big piece of metal that drives the car.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 22, 2011
#114
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #114
fiveohwblow said:
This. It destroys me to see guys time and time again think the ls is something from the heavens. Engines are air pumps folks. Let me put this in a comprible terms for you to understand...Ls motors are 351 with trick flows already installed with aluminum blocks.... THERE IS NO SECRETS TO PUSHROD ENGINES, especially in factory ones. It's a relative combination of compression, airflow, cam spec and stroke. Bam.

The ONLY SINGLE advantage to an ls is that it is aluminum. That's it. The ford 4.6's can handle 1,000 plus Hp with different internals.

It just ***king Kills me to see people think Chevy has figured a magic trick out. It's just buying horsepower for cheaper, not building it. PERIOD.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Mindless LS nutswingers who will just argue "it's better because it is" drive me insane.

The way I look at it, is that it's the modern Windsor that Ford should have built. Instead they gave us oversized (dimensionally), undersized (displacement-wise) overcomplicated, overconstrained OHC motors.

You can certainly build a Windsor to do everything an LS can do, and I'll be the first to tell you that. It's just that I fancy a fine engineering example of a pushrod V8, and the LS is definitely just that.

Shaolin Crane said:
Still got those marks in your driveway?


like a supra?

I like vettes, i'd love to build one to thrash on a road course. If i like i car i dont care if its over rated or if everyone has one, **** if i did, i wouldnt own a mustang(s)
Click to expand...

Haha hell no. Nah, my next car will be something obscure and pre-1980. Hell, it might even be pre-1960. I want a small, lightweight, coupe/convertible. Like a British roadster or something like that, maybe a Sunbeam or a early Triumph. Stuff an LS1 in it, and put some late-model Mustang suspension/brakes on it, but keep some pseudo-period-correct 15" wheels on it and dress it up to look like a Sunday racer. Use all junkyard parts and keep the overall budget under $10K. That'd be cool as hell.

I'm also equally attracted to building a no-rules hot rod, or some kind of off road vehicle. Who knows what I'll do, but it probably won't happen for a very long time, haha.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 22, 2011
#115
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #115
The marks have faded, I had fun in the vette, and if i was rich, id own one. so maybe over rated is a bad way to describe it. Over priced, cant afford one that i actually like, but someday maybe.

Just saying there are alot of cars i would buy or build, with an LSx motor, before i bought a vette.

We all know its not magic what chebby did with the LSwon. What people like about them is they got it right! They are an amazing motor, and it is exactly what every small block ever made hopes to be when it grows up. I mean come one, give them some credit. I think all the ford guys are a little mad deep down because the LS series of motors is everything we have been wishing ford would have done instead of going with modulars. I know i am. Imagine if the SBF had almost 20 more years of development under its belt.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#116
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #116
90lxcoupe said:
The marks have faded, I had fun in the vette, and if i was rich, id own one. so maybe over rated is a bad way to describe it. Over priced, cant afford one that i actually like, but someday maybe.

Just saying there are alot of cars i would buy or build, with an LSx motor, before i bought a vette.

We all know its not magic what chebby did with the LSwon. What people like about them is they got it right! They are an amazing motor, and it is exactly what every small block ever made hopes to be when it grows up. I mean come one, give them some credit. I think all the ford guys are a little mad deep down because the LS series of motors is everything we have been wishing ford would have done instead of going with modulars. I know i am. Imagine if the SBF had almost 20 more years of development under its belt.
Click to expand...
I'm definitely in agreement with that, believe me im not mindless about the advantages of the lsx and the windsor. But not all engine fit every application, sure they can be made to do similar things but the edge goes to the lsx plain and simple.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Nov 22, 2011
#117
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #117
hoopty5.0 said:
I just read the whole thread. Very interesting. The LSx arguments are hard to pass up. My buddy does LS swaps into old muscle cars and buys motor/harness/computer ls1s and 3s between 2500 and 4000 depending on what it came out of/ how many miles it has. I still refuse to do it even after helping him build a 420 rwhp Chevy II that weighs a lot less than my notch. It has run a best of 12.0 spinning, forgot mph.

With that said, it hurts me to admit that I am just over $5k into my 408 and the list of parts needed is still long. How easily could I have succumbed to peer pressure (believe me, there was lots) and just dropped in a LS that was sitting on a pallet in the corner? Hind sight - 20/20, gents.

"Best suited engine" boils down to personal preference, unfortunately. The only reason Im building the big W is because I thought I could afford it at the time and now Im in too far to turn back (no regrets though). Also thought I could prove that I could build more power, cheaper than the Chevy II. We'll see what happens at the track though.

I still get a chub when reading about other mild 408 builds like mine clicking off 10.50s and then driving home. I can hardly contain myself, as soon as I get back from this crap-arse job in Alaska, Im gonna get after it and get this FE-AL amalgamation to live. Helloooo torque!

- Collin
Click to expand...


On this school of thought... You said it is 2500-4000 for a complete ls... Hmm.

A 94+ 351 (roller) from yard around here is $200 all day long. Machining is around $150 for it to be tanked, freshened etc etc... Rebuild for another $200 or so, nice set of heads for 1500 from summit or even cheaper on Craig's but well pretend all new, custom cam $350 and miscellaneous like gaskets and valve train another $300.

Block: 200
Mach shop: 150
Rebuild: 200
Heads: 1500
Cam: 350
Gaskets and other:300
Intake manifold: 400

3100 for a potent and stout combo, and that's if you aren't looking for deals. I'm guessing almost 400 to the wheels wouldn't be difficult.

I know there will be other costs associated, but if you ask Shaolin if he'd spend 1500 on run of the mill cylinder heads he will laugh at you. They can be had for half. That's why I am not accounting for other bs. 3k is a realistic budget if you used Craig's, or to have 90% if you're going all new/rebuilt.
 

oldskolbus

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
258
13
29
WV
Nov 22, 2011
#118
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #118
Sweet 86 NikwoaC. You know were are "antique status" now. 25 years old.
As for the debat I would love to go for a ride in my 86 coupe with a coyote eng in it.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 22, 2011
#119
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #119
fiveohwblow said:
On this school of thought... You said it is 2500-4000 for a complete ls... Hmm.

A 94+ 351 (roller) from yard around here is $200 all day long. Machining is around $150 for it to be tanked, freshened etc etc... Rebuild for another $200 or so, nice set of heads for 1500 from summit or even cheaper on Craig's but well pretend all new, custom cam $350 and miscellaneous like gaskets and valve train another $300.

Block: 200
Mach shop: 150
Rebuild: 200
Heads: 1500
Cam: 350
Gaskets and other:300
Intake manifold: 400

3100 for a potent and stout combo, and that's if you aren't looking for deals. I'm guessing almost 400 to the wheels wouldn't be difficult.

I know there will be other costs associated, but if you ask Shaolin if he'd spend 1500 on run of the mill cylinder heads he will laugh at you. They can be had for half. That's why I am not accounting for other bs. 3k is a realistic budget if you used Craig's, or to have 90% if you're going all new/rebuilt.
Click to expand...

ive been finding ls1's for 800-1000 lately, prices will drop more closer to the holidays too.

Also that combo will be no where near as reliable as an ls1 and heavier. I'm not saying ls1's have a place in every mustang, but they do in my mustang.

I'm also able to say ive probably built a stout sbf for about as cheap as its gonna happen. Figure around 1700-2000 including the blower, intake to oil pan. Anything can be done cheap, but you cant change design.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Nov 22, 2011
#120
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • #120
Shaolin Crane said:
ive been finding ls1's for 800-1000 lately, prices will drop more closer to the holidays too.

Also that combo will be no where near as reliable as an ls1 and heavier. I'm not saying ls1's have a place in every mustang, but they do in my mustang.

I'm also able to say ive probably built a stout sbf for about as cheap as its gonna happen. Figure around 1700-2000 including the blower, intake to oil pan. Anything can be done cheap, but you cant change design.
Click to expand...

Well this is my point. Again, the only magical design to the ls juan is above the pistons friend. Below this its all the same... so it can be done to a sbf, bbf etc. This is why I included different heads, intake and cam. And if you built yours for 2k you just proved my point, actually both of em. The ford is just heavier. No denying this fact.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 6 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brakes 1979-1986 Fox Parking Brake Adjustment
  • LiquidStangs
  • Sep 22, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 23, 2019
LX Dave
5 lug conversion..best write up ever!
  • ryan218
  • Aug 7, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2007
Mustang5L5
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Lets make fun of some cars
  • crushnut
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2004
StangDreamin'
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?