• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Can I get 20 mpg with 4.10 gears?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lparsons
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Aug 16, 2004
#21
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #21
What do you mean it won't happen... I'm doing it in my 3700lb car. Granted, I will never see that in the city, but on the highway cruising at ~70-75mph I manage 20-21mpg with my 4.10's and TKO 5 speed... that's with a 315-35-17 tire out back too.
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Aug 16, 2004
#22
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #22
I stand totally corrected on this issue. I hate my car, it gets nasty mileage and I envy all of you getting double the miles per gallon more than me.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Aug 16, 2004
#23
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #23
94SC50 said:
I stand totally corrected on this issue. I hate my car, it gets nasty mileage and I envy all of you getting double the miles per gallon more than me.
Click to expand...

I know you you feel JR Im not doing much better w/ mine. My MPG have sucked latley after the 3.55 gear install and Im not driving the hell out of the car either. It has brand new 02 as of last may, new fuel pump and filter, new spark plugs but I guess I just have one of those cars that like gas.
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Aug 16, 2004
#24
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #24
i have 3.73s and a supercharger and i get about 215-225 per tank. if i drive with a lead foot all the time i can say good bye to that, the first week i got my blower i mangaged 150 miles on one tank.
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 16, 2004
#25
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #25
Depends on your driving. The best gas mileage I ever got was the tank after my 3.73 install and that was because I had to baby it around for a week to break them in. I got 22 mpg out of that tank and ever since have gotten a pretty consistant 18 mpg. So it has a whole lot to do with how you drive. My friend with a stock 4.6 liter was managing to get 13 mpg with his car when he first got it. But that because he was always flooring it and didnt like to use 5th so he kept it in 4th on the highway.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Aug 16, 2004
#26
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #26
You guys with power adders getting over 16mpg better check your A/F ratios

Also, for some of you with gears and NOT the right correction speedo, remember if your speedometer is turning faster than your are "really" driving, it will appear that your mileage is better than it really is.

JR...Dont worry bro...Im around 13-14 mpg, and PROUD of it...I know Im running rich, but Im not taking any chances.
RC
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Aug 16, 2004
#27
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #27
i think i get close to 20 mpg with my car and thats with some city and highway ,but i dont check it that often and don't fill it everytime , there are times when i can watch the needle move under boost at 60psi fuel pressure
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Aug 16, 2004
#28
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #28
Mine is correct Rob as I have a 6 tooth inner and a 19 or 20 tooth outer, its been so long that I can't remember.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 16, 2004
#29
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #29
I have the 3.73's with the 23 speedo tooth. So I am off 5% all the time. I just filled up & calculated my mileage again.

I went 254 miles on 12.2 gallons of gas. Now you take 95% of 254, and divide that by 12.2, and you get 19.77 MPG. That is what I got, and I have been driving like a maniac at least 50% of every stop light I leave. And we DO NOT have any highways here, so there is no crusing at 55mph anywhere.

If you car is out of tune, or you have a blower, you can only dream of 20mpg with ANY rear end gear.
Scott
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Aug 16, 2004
#30
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #30
Mines a 5 speed with 3.73's, limited amount of bolt-ons, and wide tires and I NEVER get less than 20mpg, and usually get about 225-250 miles per tank. The 3.73's actually improved my mpg over the stock 3.08's, and I drive it very hard when in the city, but on the expressway I'll set the cruise at 75-80mph.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 16, 2004
#31
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #31
I get about 225 miles per tank, mixed city/highway driving, and I have a depleted uranium foot. Translates to about 19 mpg -- though I just made a tweak to my calibration that I hope will give me 3 or 4 more mpg. We'll see!

Dave
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Aug 17, 2004
#32
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #32
Killercanary said:
Mine is correct Rob as I have a 6 tooth inner and a 19 or 20 tooth outer, its been so long that I can't remember.
Click to expand...

Is there anything you CANT do Paul?

1. Run under 12.5 in a Vert on Motor
2. Get your car in a magazine.
3. Get over 20mpg



RC

BTW: Rims going on a couple of hours!
 
F

FasterIsBetter

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
26
0
0
Pittsburgh Area
Aug 17, 2004
#33
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #33
I know you have received a lot of replys, but I consistently get over 20 mpg on the highway when I am light on the pedal. I have 4:10 gears in my 97 cobra with several mods, and even running the air on a long trip recently, I had 22 mpg. Running the car a little hard in the city I can get as low as 14. That really sucks due to the Premium only that I have to use.
 

Silver95Stint

New Member
Oct 28, 2003
350
0
0
England
Aug 17, 2004
#34
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #34
Killercanary said:
What do you mean it won't happen... I'm doing it in my 3700lb car. Granted, I will never see that in the city, but on the highway cruising at ~70-75mph I manage 20-21mpg with my 4.10's and TKO 5 speed... that's with a 315-35-17 tire out back too.
Click to expand...


I was reffering to it not happening in the city. Now on the highway it's a totally different ball game. I have yet to see any GT get 20 mpg in the city. Now if they are out there than I have been sadly misinformed, and will stand corrected. But like I said I don't see it happening in the city. 315's out back and you still manage to get pretty good gas mileage, and you run 12's in your car. What is your secret?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Aug 17, 2004
#35
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #35
What is your secret?
Click to expand...

Cruise control!!! That and an efficient combo and good tune.
 
L

lparsons

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
198
1
18
Upstate New York
Aug 17, 2004
#36
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #36
SN95 weight loss plan...

Here's another stupid question... Aren't the aluminum driveshafts lighter than the standard ones? By my understanding, in general, efficiency is increased anytime rotating mass is reduced. So if I replaced my driveshaft with an aluminum one, could I gain a little bit in the mileage? I don't think I've heard of anyone doing the aluminum driveshafts for that purpose, but I was just wondering...

I'll put on my asbestos-lined, flame-retardent jacket now...
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
Aug 17, 2004
#37
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #37
doesn't it also matter what octane gas you run??? I noticed that my stang 202 miles out of 12 gal w/ Shell Vpower 94 octane. I put shell 87 octane this time and it seems like I won't get to 202 this time. Well... my car also runs super ritch so i will have to look into cleaning some sensors and getting new O2 sensors as well, since someone said that that's the major A/F ratio problem.
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
Aug 17, 2004
#38
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #38
aluminum driveshaft sounds expensive just for better mpg
 
L

lparsons

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
198
1
18
Upstate New York
Aug 17, 2004
#39
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #39
lietuvis91 said:
aluminum driveshaft sounds expensive just for better mpg
Click to expand...

You're absolutely right on that. But I expect that the guys who have done them are doing them for more than just better mpg. So, if its one of those where I get better mpg and a little more oomph, then it sounds like a reasonable thing to look into.
(even though I said earlier I didn't want to do drivetrain stuff)
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Aug 17, 2004
#40
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #40
A lighter driveshaft could help a little in that area, it couldn't hurt, that's for sure. Lighter wheels and brakes would also be an improvement. If you wanted to run around with some draglights, complete with skinnys, the weight reduction alone could net a nice mpg increase.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
446
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
301
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
140
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
G
In expensive ceramic coating
  • gray owl
  • Jul 12, 2026
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
6
Views
170
Mustang Sound & Shine All Jul 22, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
735
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?