• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Concerns when running an Aerostar Aluminum Driveshaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gearbanger 101
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 26, 2012
#1
  • Mar 26, 2012
  • #1
I’ve got a rear aluminum driveshaft from an AWD ’96 Aerorstar on the way to replace my stock steel unit. I’m aware of the need for flange mixing and matching with the Mustang hardware at the pinion end, but what are you guys doing at the other end where the yolk slides into the tail shaft?

I ask, because the reason I’m replacing my steel unit is the rubber impregnated steel damper at the yolk end seems to have come apart (like most of them do) and is missing and the previous owner of the car didn’t replace it. As a result…I’ve got some pretty noticeable vibration at highway speed and I’m sure it’ll only get worse when I swap out my 2.73’s for a set of 3.73’s later this month.
My question is.....

For you guys that swapped out to the aluminum shaft, did you also transfer the damper over from the stock driveshaft as well, or is it no longer necessary with the aluminum shaft? I realize that the aluminum shaft shifts the harmonic resonance transfered through the engine up out of normal driving ranges and does a better job than the steel unit at controlling vibration....but is the driveshaft alone enough to keep them at bay?

I noticed that the Ford Racing unit doesn't have a damer on the end of it...but it's also a fair bit heavier built than the Aerostart shaft (3.5" vs 3.0") and I'm wondering if that should be taken into account?

Your thoughts?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 28, 2012
#2
  • Mar 28, 2012
  • #2
What….you’re telling me that with the plethora of know-it-all in this place, nobody has ever come across something like this?
 
Reactions: BANGERSTANGER76

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 28, 2012
#3
  • Mar 28, 2012
  • #3
Do you have pictures? I remember no such dampener on my steel drive shaft.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,981
2,964
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 28, 2012
#4
  • Mar 28, 2012
  • #4
I worked for a Ford dealership back in the day and we replaced a lot of those Aerostar driveshafts under warranty. I personally would not trust on of those as far as I could throw it. Technology has come a long way since, and what they made then in a word "sucks".
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 28, 2012
#5
  • Mar 28, 2012
  • #5
NikwoaC said:
Do you have pictures? I remember no such dampener on my steel drive shaft.
Click to expand...
Don't have a picture of mine at the moment, but this is what I've found surfing the net....

AOD

View attachment 152453



T5





Notice the large, ruber impregnated steel ring at the yoke? Well mine is missing. Rubber rotted away and seems to have spun off. Very common. My last 5.0L had the same issue.

Bullitt347 said:
I worked for a Ford dealership back in the day and we replaced a lot of those Aerostar driveshafts under warranty. I personally would not trust on of those as far as I could throw it. Technology has come a long way since, and what they made then in a word "sucks".
Click to expand...

Yeah....I remember a lot of the earlier ones went in with issues when I worked for Ford in the mid-90's too. The shaft I'm getting is from a '96. The '96-'97's apparently got an updated design and was what they replaced the earlier '93-'95 models with.

I see plenty of guys talk about having run them, so I'm not overly worried about breaking one. True, the 5.0L is a lot torquier than the 4.0L that was in the Aerostar...but the Mustang is also about a 1,500lb lighter verhicle by comparison....so it should put a lot less stress on the shaft and joints themselves.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Mar 29, 2012
#6
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • #6
I thought that damper was only used on 2.3 cars?
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Mar 29, 2012
#7
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • #7
I just picked up a aerostar driveshaft this morning and will be slapping it in friday evening. mine looks similar to the pic you have posted but time will tell if its messed up or not. I've got a long 3-4 mile stretch of road near my house that is nice and flat and only sees about 30 cars a day. I had my gen 1 slowmaro at 150mph down this road a few years ago and it did great. Ive only had my mustang to 120mph down this road so ill get it up to at least 80 maybe 90 to check for vibrations right now I feel a lot of vibrations around 50-70mph.

the slip yoke should get the 353 UJ from my understanding
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 29, 2012
#8
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • #8
Yea I definitely don't remember that on my steel driveshaft. I would say I'm 95% sure it had nothing there, it just tapered straight off the u-joint and went into the yoke.
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Mar 29, 2012
#9
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • #9
Ive been doing my homework and have come to a conclusion if you have a t5 you need a 353 for the slip yoke and a 369 for the diff side and for an auto they both use a 369. Ill post specs later im at work.
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Mar 29, 2012
#10
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • #10
Ok so here is what I have learned over the last 24 hours.

The T5 mustangs uses a 354 universal joint at the Yoke and AODs mustangs and the automatic 4wd Aerostar use a 369 universal joint at the yoke here are the specs for the UJs:


354
bearing A cup: 1.063
bearing A end to end: 3.620
bearing B cup: 1.063
bearing B end to end: 3.620

353
bearing A cup: 1.063
bearing A end to end: 3.220
bearing B cup: 1.063
bearing B end to end: 3.620

369
bearing A cup: 1.063
bearing A end to end: 3.220
bearing B cup: 1.063
bearing B end to end : 3.220
_______________________________________

so as you can see the cups are all the same but the length from end of the cup to end of cups are different you need a cup length of 3.220 for the Aerostar DS and depending on if you have an AOD or T5 you'll need the 3.220 or 3.620 length bearings.


I got this info from the federal mogul website



top u joint is a 353 and the bottom is a 369
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Mar 31, 2012
#11
  • Mar 31, 2012
  • #11
The strength of the stock Mustang U joints is seriously in question to me. I've seen them snapped clean off and I don't want that to happen to me. As a result, I've yet to give my Mustang any real traction.
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Mar 31, 2012
#12
  • Mar 31, 2012
  • #12
i know federal mogul makes a stranger u joint they are available from Oreillys the part #'s are 270 and 280
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Mar 31, 2012
#13
  • Mar 31, 2012
  • #13
I was actually looking at these driveshaft parts. They seem like they are actually built to put up with abuse. This driveshaft is rated to 500 HP. I would get the matching pinion yolk. All told it would be about $400 give or take.



http://www.dennysdriveshaft.com/p1290_1310_series_hd_3_inch_driveshaft.html
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 2, 2012
#14
  • Apr 2, 2012
  • #14
David Pepiton said:
Ok so here is what I have learned over the last 24 hours.

The T5 mustangs uses a 354 universal joint at the Yoke and AODs mustangs and the automatic 4wd Aerostar use a 369 universal joint at the yoke here are the specs for the UJs:


354
bearing A cup: 1.063
bearing A end to end: 3.620
bearing B cup: 1.063
bearing B end to end: 3.620

353
bearing A cup: 1.063
bearing A end to end: 3.220
bearing B cup: 1.063
bearing B end to end: 3.620

369
bearing A cup: 1.063
bearing A end to end: 3.220
bearing B cup: 1.063
bearing B end to end : 3.220
_______________________________________

so as you can see the cups are all the same but the length from end of the cup to end of cups are different you need a cup length of 3.220 for the Aerostar DS and depending on if you have an AOD or T5 you'll need the 3.220 or 3.620 length bearings.


I got this info from the federal mogul website



top u joint is a 354 and the bottom is a 369
Click to expand...
Something is screwy here. You state that the top U-Joint is a 354, which according to your description above has even-length ends at both A&B.

....yet the top U-joint clearly shows two different length sides at A&B, that seem to match the dimensions of the 353 bearing in your description above. So which is it?
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Apr 2, 2012
#15
  • Apr 2, 2012
  • #15
Sorry posted the wrong picture in the pic is a 353 on top and 369 on bottom I will fix it
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 2, 2012
#16
  • Apr 2, 2012
  • #16
That makes more sense. Gotta order my joints tomorrow and didn't want to end up with the wrong ones.

On a side note....although the '96-'97 yoke has the same 27T spline as the Mustang yoke, the yoke shaft length itself is about 1 1/2-2" shorter than the Mustangs. It may still slide in, but you're eliminating a lot of spline area from the equasion using the Aerostar one....so I just swapped them over. The Aerostar shaft had a damper on the yoke as well.

Also....after pulling my stock shaft, I see that there actually was no rubber balancer on it. Which leads me to believe that they were only located on the AOD and as vristang stated, 4-cylinder specific. Since my last Mustang was previously an AOD, it would make sense. It was shot, so I replaced it with one I bought from a wrecker. They must have sold a 4-cylinder driveshaft as a replacement?

Glad that's cleared up.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 11, 2012
#17
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #17
Just an update....

Went with the 353 joints at both ends. Had to transfer the Mustang yolk and flange over to the Aerostar drive shaft.

Works great....cut the shifter vibration down considerably. Car seems a little spunkier in the lower regions. Keep in mind, I also converted to an electric fan at the same time, which probably contributed to the added spunk. It still vibrates under hard acceleration, but I suspect that's the stock control arms and their weak/worn out bushings causing the pinion to distort, not anything to do with the driveshaft.

All in all, I've got about $140 into it. Less than half of what it would have cost me for the FRPP shaft.
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Apr 11, 2012
#18
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #18
my DS swap was like $95 since i work for a auto parts company and got the shaft for $65
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Apr 11, 2012
#19
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #19
When I was fifteen, I used to steal my parents '91 AWD Aerostar w/ the 4.0 V-6 all the time. One night, I thought it would be a good idea to rev it up and do a neutral drop into drive while stopped. All I heard was a loud "clunk"

My friends and I then went and stole another friends dads Jeep Wagoneer and we proceeded to push the Aerostar back to my parents house. I denied the incident to them, and I still feel bad about it.... the service tech who repaired it said he'd never seen anything like it. The shaft within the transfer case was distorted and broken
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Apr 11, 2012
#20
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #20
lol...Nate, Opps...

Brian, yes the AOD cars had the damper, never seen one stock on a manual car.

Maryland Stang, The Driveshaft Shop has some nice driveshafts that will take a lot of power, pricing is decent as well I get them a good bit below what most retail at. Your right the issue is the flange, swapping to a pinion style yoke in the rear is a must in any high hp car, I do it more lately. Strange makes them as well....

Here's a quote from The Driveshaft Shop I always liked "The Ford Motorsport Shaft is inexpensive but is also made from Extruded tube. Extruded Aluminum tube is inexpensive and is made by using something like a play-doh factory" Personally weve pushed the Ford Racing shafts to 900hp with no issues, although were using a pinion yoke, car 60ft's in the 1.4 range.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
345
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
614
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
976
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
597
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?