• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Drove an RX-8

  • Thread starter Thread starter DevilishCobra03
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

DevilishCobra03

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
265
0
0
Nov 14, 2003
#1
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #1
....wow
 

stang2000ia

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
88
0
0
Iowa
Nov 14, 2003
#2
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #2
DevilishCobra03 said:
....wow
Click to expand...


what do you think of the rotary engine? my friends and i were talking about this once how in the rx-7's the engines seemed to give out once they got some miles on them and they werent very dependable? just wondering what your thoughts on it was.
 

DevilishCobra03

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
265
0
0
Nov 14, 2003
#3
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #3
Well, since they are configured to run on Japanese 102 octane, that is where most of the problems came from. They are just like anything else, though. Daily driving you shouldnt see any problems, but when you go screwing with things, you better know whats going on. It was awesome to drive a car that revved like a sportbike. The dealer told me that the clutch engaged best around 2500, but whenever I hit the gas it jumped up to 3500.....I powershifted it at 8500 1-2 and the damn thing broke loose on me. Not too shabby for 238 HP. I see great things in Mazda's future. The interior finish is better than many cars almost twice the price that I have seen. And i don't think that I have to even go into handling. I was thoroughly impressed. If I hadnt heard a rumor that the 7 might be coming back I would probably buy one....great deal for 30 grand.
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Nov 14, 2003
#4
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #4
DevilishCobra03 said:
Well, since they are configured to run on Japanese 102 octane, that is where most of the problems came from. They are just like anything else, though. Daily driving you shouldnt see any problems, but when you go screwing with things, you better know whats going on. It was awesome to drive a car that revved like a sportbike. The dealer told me that the clutch engaged best around 2500, but whenever I hit the gas it jumped up to 3500.....I powershifted it at 8500 1-2 and the damn thing broke loose on me. Not too shabby for 238 HP. I see great things in Mazda's future. The interior finish is better than many cars almost twice the price that I have seen. And i don't think that I have to even go into handling. I was thoroughly impressed. If I hadnt heard a rumor that the 7 might be coming back I would probably buy one....great deal for 30 grand.
Click to expand...

yes, but who else but mazda would solve an oil burning problem with the rx-7 by adding an extra oil tank. the only reason i know this is because some dude i used to go to school with had one and it used to burn oil like nobodys business.. and it wasnt just his...its one of the rotary engines desgin flaws. anyways i thing the front of the rx8 is ugly. it reminds me of sid the sloth from the movie ice age.
 

Integraholic

I own the place
Founding Member
Jul 24, 2002
281
0
0
Indy
Nov 14, 2003
#5
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #5
Those are the Wankel Rotary engines. This new one is the Renesis Rotary. I dont know much about it, but It's bound to be a bit better than the old one. Now if Mazda slapped a couple turbos on, got rid of the fugly tails, I'd buy one.
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Nov 14, 2003
#6
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #6
Integraholic said:
Those are the Wankel Rotary engines. This new one is the Renesis Rotary. I dont know much about it, but It's bound to be a bit better than the old one. Now if Mazda slapped a couple turbos on, got rid of the fugly tails, I'd buy one.
Click to expand...

i had no idea there was more than one type of rotary engine. i still think is ugly though
 

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,
Apr 22, 2003
843
0
0
VA Beach
Nov 14, 2003
#7
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #7
there should be a turbo rx-8
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Nov 14, 2003
#8
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #8
the prob with that engine without the turbo is torque, or the lack of
 

BABstangV6

Smater than the average bear!
Apr 3, 2003
595
0
0
Rock Hill, SC
Nov 14, 2003
#9
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #9
i want the supra to come back
 

aznzebra

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
77
0
0
waterloo, ontario
Nov 14, 2003
#10
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #10
BABstangV6 said:
i want the supra to come back
Click to expand...

i dont, because everyone else would get owned again, like in 94 when it completely caught the middle class sport category off guard. hhhaha
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Nov 14, 2003
#11
  • Nov 14, 2003
  • #11
mustang50v8 said:
yes, but who else but mazda would solve an oil burning problem with the rx-7 by adding an extra oil tank. the only reason i know this is because some dude i used to go to school with had one and it used to burn oil like nobodys business.. and it wasnt just his...its one of the rotary engines desgin flaws. anyways i thing the front of the rx8 is ugly. it reminds me of sid the sloth from the movie ice age.
Click to expand...


hehe the rotary is made to burn oil
it injects oil into the combustion chamber to lub the seals

and it doesn't need an oil tank to do it but rather it takes it straight from the sump



but it isn't a design flaw either the system works very well as long as the oil seals don't go and if they go more often then not that is owner error as to why they go
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Nov 15, 2003
#12
  • Nov 15, 2003
  • #12
stang2000ia said:
what do you think of the rotary engine? my friends and i were talking about this once how in the rx-7's the engines seemed to give out once they got some miles on them and they werent very dependable? just wondering what your thoughts on it was.
Click to expand...

the motor itself is very reliable
you will see a lot of second gen N/A rx7 with 200k plus on them
mine is almost there (197k) with much abuse on it from auto-x, braket racing and my finding the open road and just letting loose through the turns
and still to this day hit above the redline when I want to work the motor and doesn't even break a sweat


and it is also a very strong motor. think I heard one time able to handle 1200hp on fully stock internals.
but many of the problems with turbo is tuning.
detonation just kills the thing. but that is tuner error not fault of the motor
also mazda tried to cut cost and wieght putting a cheap radiator in there not fit for the job ahead of it. almost maxed fuel system and some ****ty computer controls for fuel injection. all of that puts more stress on the motor then what it was designed for.
and again a lot of problems ppl come into though is they get a turbo do some mods and don't give it more fuel detonation happens motor blows and it is now the fault of the motor though when in all reality it is there fault


but oh wel
 
A

awalbert88

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2001
599
1
0
Lancaster, PA
Nov 15, 2003
#13
  • Nov 15, 2003
  • #13
The reason there's no turbo RX-8 yet is because Mazda used high-compression rotors on it (10.0:1). Unlike with piston engines, lowering the comrpession to accommodate a turbo is not quite a straightforward process, because you have to engineer a whole new rotor (plenty of off-the-shelf parts for piston engines.. not with rotary).

The N/A FC will run damn near forever if you keep up with maintenance. The turbo models are a bit more picky and if you don't keep absolutely on top of them they can get out of hand. If rotary engines had gotten as much development effort as piston engines have over the years, then we'd see them being used a lot more widely as they are quite reliable.

The lack of low-end torque though is a major drawback to the N/A versions. But that doesn't seem to stop the ricers from getting wood over VTEC, so...
 

Integraholic

I own the place
Founding Member
Jul 24, 2002
281
0
0
Indy
Nov 15, 2003
#14
  • Nov 15, 2003
  • #14
Kiss my VTEC awalbert.
 
S

SpectorV

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2000
1,872
0
36
Florence, Alabama
Nov 15, 2003
#15
  • Nov 15, 2003
  • #15
VTEC is a crutch for small displacment/no tq DAMN IT WHERE IS MY VTEC !!!!
 

98CobraClone

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
592
0
0
Ripley, Ohio
Nov 16, 2003
#16
  • Nov 16, 2003
  • #16
don't make no matter anyway......."my civic will be so much faster when I get the VTECH in it"

My stang will be so much faster when I get a blown 460, WTF is that

Back on subject, I've seen several older RX-7's running around here......looking like crap, but sounding good. I got to ride in a twin turbo RX-7 during an SCCA sponsored course when I was in college, they're complete and total bada$$, and mazda has been playing with the rotary engine for some time now, so they have it down pretty good now
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Nov 16, 2003
#17
  • Nov 16, 2003
  • #17
did ford try or want anything with the rotary back in the day?

I think just about every manufac tried but not sure about dodge or ford?

know GM did but they couldn't get it going right
but so did mercedes benz, rolls tried a diesel rotary, and quite a few others jumped on but nobody was really able to make a decent working version
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Nov 16, 2003
#18
  • Nov 16, 2003
  • #18
ford owns mazda dont it?
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Nov 16, 2003
#19
  • Nov 16, 2003
  • #19
rx-8 looks like a bad 80's throwback. the lack of torque is disgusting. if they make a turbo version, then i could definitely respect that, though. and yes, ford owns some part of mazda, not sure how much...
 

Integraholic

I own the place
Founding Member
Jul 24, 2002
281
0
0
Indy
Nov 16, 2003
#20
  • Nov 16, 2003
  • #20
jcp123 said:
JCP's Stang
-'68 Hardtop
-306 from '77 Granada
-Edelbrock 600DP, Edelbrock Perf RPM intake
-Ported heads
-Electronic HEI
-Roller rockers
-9.5 compression
-Tri-y headers, Jeg's cutouts, Dynomax RaceMagnum Bullet Muffs dumped out the side
-9" Posi (2.73's )
-2K3 Mach 1 Heritage Wheels, 245/45-WR17
-C4 Auto w/ B+M QuickSilver
Warning - Hondas will be
Click to expand...
What ya running?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
80
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 2:41 PM
Mcmahst
2
02 mustang gt crank no start
  • 2v.cjmullis
  • Jan 28, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
304
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2026
Noobz347
L
A/C doesn't work after long drive
  • lking78
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
45
SVT Tech Forum Tuesday at 11:59 PM
Noobz347
Pure love for a Foxbody!
  • TuFun
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • Video and Media
Replies
0
Views
106
Video and Media Sep 8, 2025
TuFun
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
216
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?