• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Drove an RX-8

  • Thread starter Thread starter DevilishCobra03
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Nov 17, 2003
#41
  • Nov 17, 2003
  • #41
you would own our 2003 civic and 3,000,000 (estimate) other stock 91-03 civics riding around . a stock Si might give you a run.
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Nov 17, 2003
#42
  • Nov 17, 2003
  • #42
AXIStang said:
you would own our 2003 civic and 3,000,000 (estimate) other stock 91-03 civics riding around . a stock Si might give you a run.
Click to expand...

actually, it probably would. i make no claims as to my car being fast...
 

Integraholic

I own the place
Founding Member
Jul 24, 2002
281
0
0
Indy
Nov 18, 2003
#43
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #43
Turbos are fun, dont knock em till you try em.
 

CANTONRACER

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2000
885
0
0
Cuyahoga Falls, Akron & Canton, OH
Nov 19, 2003
#44
  • Nov 19, 2003
  • #44
For the average Joe, a good n2o kit will make goobs of power for a small amount of coin.

To consider a turbo or supercharger legit while saying n2o is not is not logical. They are all considered power adders. And to say it is hard on internals...sounds like your talking out yer ass because all three are, just with n2o it is way to easy to just bump it up, hence the bad rap about internals. Take your average v8 f-bod, can handle a 150 shot all day long, no probs. But you get some goof who decides to up it to 250 and all of a sudden n2o is bad.

Until you ride in a bad car that runs a powerful, well tuned n2o setup, don't bad mouth it.
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Nov 19, 2003
#45
  • Nov 19, 2003
  • #45
there was a vid in v8 talk of some idiot who used a 400 shot in a 350z, put some nice holes in the engine
 

DevilishCobra03

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
265
0
0
Nov 20, 2003
#46
  • Nov 20, 2003
  • #46
I would have liked to see that explosion......
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
Nov 20, 2003
#47
  • Nov 20, 2003
  • #47
CANTONRACER said:
For the average Joe, a good n2o kit will make goobs of power for a small amount of coin.

To consider a turbo or supercharger legit while saying n2o is not is not logical. They are all considered power adders. And to say it is hard on internals...sounds like your talking out yer ass because all three are, just with n2o it is way to easy to just bump it up, hence the bad rap about internals. Take your average v8 f-bod, can handle a 150 shot all day long, no probs. But you get some goof who decides to up it to 250 and all of a sudden n2o is bad.

Until you ride in a bad car that runs a powerful, well tuned n2o setup, don't bad mouth it.
Click to expand...

YES, the only time nitrous becomes dangerous is when tuning is poor. Using too much is bad also. It would be the same as trying to run a T04 turbo on my 2.3's stock cast pistons. The power would blow them to little chunks. Basically, you build and tune the car to what you want to run. You can't just slap a 200 shot onto any car, and then when it blows up, blame the nitrous for it. NO, it's the IDIOTS who misuse it.

I just think it's cheating when some loser just slaps nitrous on a stock car. It's totally different than a supercharger or turbo. You have to build and tune the car to run a forced induction power adder (fuel, computer, exhaust manifold on turbo, etc.). With a basic nitrous setup, you can run a 50 shot on just about any car. I feel thats cheating.
 

94T-Rex

Founding Member
Mar 26, 2002
646
0
0
bay area, CA
Jan 6, 2004
#48
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #48
DevilishCobra03 said:
Well, since they are configured to run on Japanese 102 octane, that is where most of the problems came from. They are just like anything else, though. Daily driving you shouldnt see any problems, but when you go screwing with things, you better know whats going on. It was awesome to drive a car that revved like a sportbike. The dealer told me that the clutch engaged best around 2500, but whenever I hit the gas it jumped up to 3500.....I powershifted it at 8500 1-2 and the damn thing broke loose on me. Not too shabby for 238 HP. I see great things in Mazda's future. The interior finish is better than many cars almost twice the price that I have seen. And i don't think that I have to even go into handling. I was thoroughly impressed. If I hadnt heard a rumor that the 7 might be coming back I would probably buy one....great deal for 30 grand.
Click to expand...

I am very happy to see a domestic owner that is not bias to small dispacement engines. I have a twin turbo 94 Rx7 with 350 rwhp. I thought the rx-8 would be boring and a dog since the rx7 out specs it. I drove the car and was so impressed and I bought it. Now I have an rx7 and rx8.

I love both cars, the rx-7 is definately more of a brute and way more power, but the rx8 is SO forgiving and is the easiest car in the world to drive fast. The fit and finish on this car is spectacular, and yes you are right the interior is AMAZING.

Glad you enjoyed the car!!
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Jan 9, 2004
#49
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #49
3spd on floor said:
ford and mazda have been swapping engines and other parts for years now, there is no reason why they couldnt put the rotary in a ford car. dont believe it, pop the hood of a probe gt, or a new mazda truck, you'll see ford on the mazda engine, and mazda on the probe engine.
Click to expand...

also if you look at the 6 cylinder in the mazda6 that engine is actually a ford engine. it has ford stamped all over the block. it was just tuned by the people at mazda. i know this cause i saw the engine on an engine stand at last years auto show
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
149
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 6, 2026
gray owl
G
2
02 mustang gt crank no start
  • 2v.cjmullis
  • Jan 28, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
329
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2026
Noobz347
L
A/C doesn't work after long drive
  • lking78
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
71
SVT Tech Forum Jun 30, 2026
Noobz347
Pure love for a Foxbody!
  • TuFun
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • Video and Media
Replies
0
Views
116
Video and Media Sep 8, 2025
TuFun
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
243
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?