ARed1995GT said:performer 5.0's going in soon
thats what i was thinking...yellow1995Cobra said:LOL u guys are crazy. Snoozer is going 12.9@105 with an e cam, stock heads, gt40 intake and 70mm tbody. I would say its worth it
yellow1995Cobra said:LOL u guys are crazy. Snoozer is going 12.9@105 with an e cam, stock heads, gt40 intake and 70mm tbody. I would say its worth it
VibrantRedGT said:He's also using a 302 block built by Bennett Racing. I don't recall what was done to it though.
With the mileage on your car and the valve springs being 10 years old I would hold off. Plus the front of the motor has to stripped down. Why not just do it all at once anyway.
95snoozer said:
no sir
I have a D&D block. its just stock internals with fox body forged pistons. and they are fly cut so I lost compression over stock. so this is not a factor or excuse as to why my car is faster than others. I hate when peopel try to use that as a scape
(
it is up to you, because i listen to you when it comes to my car lol... to a certain pointVibrantRedGT said:Never read about anyone saying it was the reason. I just remember it being not 94-95 block stock so relax you've done well with E7's.
Anyways, the author of this post lives two doors down from me. His question was about putting an E cam on stock heads right now. Not a debate as to whether the E cam is the best cam. My reason is merely why take it apart twice (cam then heads) when it can be done in one shot. I think we can all agree that the car would pull harder up top with the cam change. Personally I would wait but it's not up to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?