• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

e303 cam w/ stock heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ARed1995GT
  • Start date Start date May 7, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 8, 2004
#21
  • May 8, 2004
  • #21
VibrantRedGT said:
Never read about anyone saying it was the reason. I just remember it being not 94-95 block stock so relax you've done well with E7's.

Anyways, the author of this post lives two doors down from me. His question was about putting an E cam on stock heads right now. Not a debate as to whether the E cam is the best cam. My reason is merely why take it apart twice (cam then heads) when it can be done in one shot. I think we can all agree that the car would pull harder up top with the cam change. Personally I would wait but it's not up to me.
Click to expand...

thats not why you mentioned it. You and I know that.

but as with my post, I say dont do an e cam on stock heads,

or any cam unless its a better split design with ported heads. I have lots of friends that went higgh 11s on ported E7s with a good cam. theses are in fox bodies, so that is good for mid 12s in a 95.
 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
2,723
0
0
Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)
May 8, 2004
#22
  • May 8, 2004
  • #22
I never know anything about your d&d bottom end. That is kinda strange that I never saw you mention it. I guess people keep what mods they done to thare car top secret, explains your traps.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
May 8, 2004
#23
  • May 8, 2004
  • #23
95snoozer said:
thats not why you mentioned it. You and I know that.
Click to expand...

Busted, you got me.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
May 8, 2004
#24
  • May 8, 2004
  • #24
stang_gt_1994 said:
I never know anything about your d&d bottom end. That is kinda strange that I never saw you mention it. I guess people keep what mods they done to thare car top secret, explains your traps.
Click to expand...

He has mentioned it numerous times.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 8, 2004
#25
  • May 8, 2004
  • #25
stang_gt_1994 said:
I never know anything about your d&d bottom end. That is kinda strange that I never saw you mention it. I guess people keep what mods they done to thare car top secret, explains your traps.
Click to expand...
how the hell does that explain traps!!!!??

I have posted my build sheet many times that has the tolrances of the block.

that doesnt explain my traps its not a horsepower booster and if you think it does, you are ignorant.

I can drive, and my car is light because I worked it down to where it is.

END OF STORY

p.s. my motor has 25k of racing and long trips to go race every week. when I am not racing, I baby it to try to balance out all the abuse.
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
May 8, 2004
#26
  • May 8, 2004
  • #26
E cam doesn't make power or if it does, very little, after 4500 RPMs according to friends I've talken to that have had their cars dynoed.

Matt
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
May 8, 2004
#27
  • May 8, 2004
  • #27
................................
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 8, 2004
#28
  • May 8, 2004
  • #28
Matts89LX5.0 said:
E cam doesn't make power or if it does, very little, after 4500 RPMs according to friends I've talken to that have had their cars dynoed.

Matt
Click to expand...


 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
May 8, 2004
#29
  • May 8, 2004
  • #29
Any car is going to make power if it has a good enough head on it. The arguement that "my car went XX.XX @ 1XX with an E-cam, so it can't be that good," doesn't hold water. I can guarantee you that your car will run harder with a split pattern cam in it - PERIOD. That, in my book, makes the E-cam garbage. The best part about the E-cam is the 110 LSA, which can also be a downfall for a daily driven 94-95.

Snoozer's car runs the times that it does because his car is light and he can drive. There still is still plenty left in the car, and I'm sure he'd admit that. Even if his tolerances were tight and at a "race spec," it wouldn't make a difference. He doesn't turn the RPM or have the power output to actually see a difference in tight clearances.

Joe
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 8, 2004
#30
  • May 8, 2004
  • #30
yeah... I would much rather have a nice split cam.....

i am changing to a 112 lsa 218/226 .544/.544 this summer

If you had a head with a 80%+ i/e ratio then the single pattern cam would work. but the ecam just is notorious for its poor torque production.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
May 8, 2004
#31
  • May 8, 2004
  • #31
95snoozer said:
i am changing to a 112 lsa 218/226 .544/.544 this summer
Click to expand...
Hitting up AFM are ya?

Joe
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 9, 2004
#32
  • May 9, 2004
  • #32
as soon as my second comission check comes.

I finally got a job! no more poor college student only getting faster by removing hidden weight.

But i still have 50 pounds to take out
 

BlueDevil95

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
184
0
0
Elkton, MD.
May 9, 2004
#33
  • May 9, 2004
  • #33
95snoozer said:
how the hell does that explain traps!!!!??

I have posted my build sheet many times that has the tolrances of the block.

that doesnt explain my traps its not a horsepower booster and if you think it does, you are ignorant.

I can drive, and my car is light because I worked it down to where it is.

END OF STORY

p.s. my motor has 25k of racing and long trips to go race every week. when I am not racing, I baby it to try to balance out all the abuse.
Click to expand...


not to butt in, but i'm curious about what your car weighs and how you got it there. i'm not doubting you at all, but i'm trying to shave a few pounds off my pig and i saw you mention your car was pretty light. i have done the rear seat delete kit from accp, yanked dogbone, no emissions equipment and the obvious motor and suspension pieces to lose some weight.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 9, 2004
#34
  • May 9, 2004
  • #34
it should mostly be in the sig

no smog
orh
gt40 intake
rear seat delete
no spare or jack
no sway bar
no strut tower brace.
no dog bone
no rear trunk carpet or board
1 horn
no windshield wiper resevoir (its the fluid that actually weighs anything.)
a few metal brackets here and there that weigh less than a pound.

GTS features
no spoiler
no cruise control
no ABS

i have the added weight of power leather seats

at times, I had floor matts out and windshield wipers. 5 pounds. but not when I ran 12.95.

I run about 1-2 gallons of gas at the track.

my 12.95 came at my heaviest raceweight in forever. 3265

I am 160-165, 5'8

I have been as low as 3215 with driver.

I have a thread here where I listed almost everything you can do and its exact weight.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 9, 2004
#35
  • May 9, 2004
  • #35
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?p=4151879#post4151879
 

BlueDevil95

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
184
0
0
Elkton, MD.
May 10, 2004
#36
  • May 10, 2004
  • #36
95snoozer said:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?p=4151879#post4151879
Click to expand...


thanks!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
468
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
J
Low RPM jerking
  • Justinkins
  • Jul 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
164
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 11, 2026
fasterthangas
F
R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
912
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
371
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
175
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?