• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Estimation for road domination

  • Thread starter Thread starter '69Mach1Chick
  • Start date Start date Jul 18, 2004
6

'69Mach1Chick

There's no grass left to cut.
Apr 1, 2002
348
0
0
North Jersey
Jul 18, 2004
#1
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #1
I am looking to buy a 69 fatsback. I found one for $2000. My boss checked it out for me. It's i great shape the int. is perfect and the body is straight. The framerails are good and floor supports even better. The rockers are done also. the car comes with a straight 6 in it. And it runs. He is also giving me a 289, which i haven't seen. it needs a fuel tank, fuel lines run, the guy is giving me the quarter panel that needs to be put on, and it needs the trunk lid put back on. I will have money for the car in the next week or so and i work in a shop where i can use the equiptment.I was wondering how long you think the car will take to get on the road. I want it done as soon as possible and was also wondering how long it takes for a motor swap. I have a 351 clev that i can get for like $500. Any advice will help.
 
D

davo425

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
4
0
0
Mississippi
Jul 18, 2004
#2
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #2
probly take about 2 or 3 weeks (mabey 4) of hard work to put it back on the road(including time to order various parts), a motor swap should only take a day to a weekend if you got everything ready..... the proper replacement parts,tools,people,shop,etc......
i'd opt for the 289 over the cleveland motor........for the same price of the 351C you can find a good running 302 or 351w that you would be much more happier with
what tranny does it have in it? doesnt the cleveland only accept certain bolt patterns? that is something esle to think about, the 289, 302, and 351w are pretty universal in a sense when it comes to the drivetrain......parts are much cheaper also, plus everybody and their mother knows how to work on them
one option is a latemodel running 302 or 351 for a few hundred, here you can find them all day long for 300 dollars in salvage yards out of wrecked 5.0's and f-150s. Call up mustangs plus and get the proper stuff to convert over to the early model driveline. Thats what i did however i used a gt-40x crate motor in carburated form with old style pullyes and front dress. Roller motors are the way to go. However if the guy is giving you a 289 save some money and use it.
Good luck with it. Davo
by the way if you decide to convert to roller motor let me know and i will be glad to help ya out, i've gone throug it several times.
 

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
Jul 18, 2004
#3
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #3
IMO, clevelands are great motors...really more a detuned race motor than anything else. Out of the box in mostly stock condition they will run circles around most other motors. Years ago, you went with clevelands because the aftermarket was fairly limited. I mean when was the last time you heard of someone putting a 351w head on a 289/302? The aftermarket has really caught up. What will happen is that you will have to pay more for a 351c up front and then everytime you buy speed parts for it. 302/351w are cheap and the aftermarket is reasonable. When it comes down to it, I believe you could build comporable power for cheaper with a 351w. Just my opinion.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jul 18, 2004
#4
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #4
Windsor stuff may be cheaper, but with a Cleveland you don't have to buy heads to get high performance. However, it's probably easier to build a Windsor, because there are a lot more of them. The knowledge on how to build one is more common.

I'm putting a Cleveland in my car, because I want a Cleveland. To me the rarity is cool, I like the "factory race engine" part of it.. to me it's better in every way. I guess it's part of the fun for me being able to make the car exactly what I want. I mean, getting high performance out of a 30 year old car is not the most logical, easiest thing. We all have old cars because we love the old cars, not because it's the cheapest way to go.

BTW, the transmission bolt pattern is the same between the Cleveland and the Ford small blocks. The Cleveland is a little larger than a 351W, due to the canted valves. In stock form, it weighs about 25 pounds more than a 351W.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 18, 2004
#5
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #5
the really fun thing here is if you have the 250 six, the cleveland will bolt to the bellhousing. if you have the 200 six it wont.
 
6

'69Mach1Chick

There's no grass left to cut.
Apr 1, 2002
348
0
0
North Jersey
Jul 18, 2004
#6
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #6
I'm not sure which one it is. Currently there is a 3spd manual. I am not planning on building any motor. Just a stock clev and if i do get it, it comes with all the accessories and radiator. I think the guy is also giving me the electronic ignition parts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Contour fan CFM
  • Mustang5L5
  • Apr 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
468
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 22, 2026
qikgts
D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
284
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
366
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
C
Help with headers
  • candyass
  • Jul 28, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
157
The Welcome Wagon Jul 28, 2025
AeroCoupe
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
198
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?