• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Ford's 400HP 5.0 (Coyote) V8 spied !

  • Thread starter Thread starter red05bullitgt
  • Start date Start date Jan 21, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan 26, 2009
#41
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #41
snakekiller said:
o i just read the article yeah it aluminum very nice but is it a modular engine or a push rod? aren't modular engine heavier i am new to modular engines on a mustang i always liked the older engines
Click to expand...


It's a modular engine, and being that it's also an aluminum engine. It should definitely be much lighter than a larger displacement push rod.
 
M

mattsstang87

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
32
0
0
"In a VAN...down by the River!" WV
Jan 26, 2009
#42
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #42
From what I can see of the heads, they look like a copy of the ones on 3.5 Duratec V6 like in my Edge.

Also notice how low the Coyote sits in the engine bay. Built to be COMPACT. I swear Ford added two cylinders to a Duratec 35 and spread it from 60 to 90 degrees!




The Duratec 35:

 

Attachments

  • coyote1.webp
    82.9 KB · Views: 1,465
  • 0-ford-s-duratec-35--4_800x0w.webp
    79.7 KB · Views: 400

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jan 26, 2009
#43
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #43
Ford Racing already have the 5.0L Cammer crate engine that's based on a 4.6 Cobra DOHC 4-valve. It produces 420hp @ 6700rpm and 370lbft @ 5000rpm in EFI form so they could use it in the 2011 Mustang. It would have the HP required to be competitive with the 425hp 6.1L Hemi in the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 and the 430hp 6.2L LS3 in the 2009 Camaro SS.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 26, 2009
#44
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #44
What I'm worried about is the updated "cost" we're all going to see with the updated engine. The FRPP 5.0L "Cammer" starts at $14,000. You don't think they're going to put their premium Modular Aftermarket engine (or a similar version of) and allow us the luxury of the same sticker price we've seen as of late, do you?

There's a reason the Mustang is so much less expensive than both the Dodge and the Chevy. As underpowered as it may be by comparison, one thing that the 4.6L 3V did do for the Mustang was keep the over all cost down.
 
M

mattsstang87

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
32
0
0
"In a VAN...down by the River!" WV
Jan 26, 2009
#45
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #45
The bucket tappet arrangement used on the Duratec heads make it have much shorter cam covers. Much more efficient and cost effective valvetrain. Very simple and the materials make it so you do not have to check clearance until about 150k miles. Big step up from the old SHO V6 (which had a similar arrangement)!
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 26, 2009
#46
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #46
my only gripe is that it's not a pushrod motor.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 26, 2009
#47
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #47
stykthyn said:
my only gripe is that it's not a pushrod motor.
Click to expand...

What difference would having pushrods make? Even if they were to bring back the pushrod engine, it won't be the famed 302/351W we all knew and loved. It'll be of a new design and therefore still every bit the new sheet of paperm thats as green and costly for aftermarket parts as a new OHC would be. Its already been proven that the OHC design is the superior of the two, so why take a step back in technoligy when the only advantage the previous OHV design had over the OHC....which was lower cost and a plethora of aftermarket following, is now a non issue?

The only real downfall of the previous OHC engines was their lack of displacement. Once that's addressed with the new line up, there's no stopping them.
 
M

mattsstang87

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
32
0
0
"In a VAN...down by the River!" WV
Jan 26, 2009
#48
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #48
If they just took a Duratec 37 and added 2 more cylinders you would get 4.93 liters. Hummm... Of course the Duratec 35/37 is a 60 degree engine, and the one in the pic is obviously 90 degrees, but you get the idea I hope. Remember, the old 302 (our beloved 5.0) is really not a 5.0 but a 4.9 that Ford chose to round up (from 4.95Liters) because 5.0 sounds and looks better.
 

AvalancheSVT

10 Year Member
Jun 12, 2005
573
37
49
Jan 26, 2009
#49
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #49
the duratec engines are awesome. that was the only thing i liked about my cougar in 2001. they have great top end, are very reliable, and sound GREAT.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 26, 2009
#50
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #50
MakotoS13 said:
the duratec engines are awesome. that was the only thing i liked about my cougar in 2001. they have great top end, are very reliable, and sound GREAT.
Click to expand...

Its a shame that the cars themselves (Contours, Mystics, '99-up Cougars) were such a nightmare to work on.
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
Jan 26, 2009
#51
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #51
How about setting the motor further back and lower to help weight bias? In addition to all aluminum of course. Oh and a multi-link IRS and updated unequal length control arm front suspension?

One can dream....
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 26, 2009
#52
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #52
Mr_Q said:
How about setting the motor further back and lower to help weight bias? In addition to all aluminum of course. Oh and a multi-link IRS and updated unequal length control arm front suspension?

One can dream....
Click to expand...

Your dreams are expensive.
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan 26, 2009
#53
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #53
Bullitt95 said:
Ford Racing already have the 5.0L Cammer crate engine that's based on a 4.6 Cobra DOHC 4-valve. It produces 420hp @ 6700rpm and 370lbft @ 5000rpm in EFI form so they could use it in the 2011 Mustang. It would have the HP required to be competitive with the 425hp 6.1L Hemi in the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 and the 430hp 6.2L LS3 in the 2009 Camaro SS.
Click to expand...

FYI, the new 400HP 5.0, is not based off the Ford Racing 5.0 Cammer, which is a bored out version of the 4.6 Cobra DOHC 4 value.

This new 5.0, is going to be a mass produced, and completely new designed DOHC 4 valve, that will also be more fuel efficient thanks to a new engine management control system, and will include a bucket tappet arrangement for the valvetrain which is also more efficient, uses less parts, and takes less space !
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan 26, 2009
#54
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #54
Gearbanger 101 said:
What I'm worried about is the updated "cost" we're all going to see with the updated engine. The FRPP 5.0L "Cammer" starts at $14,000. You don't think they're going to put their premium Modular Aftermarket engine (or a similar version of) and allow us the luxury of the same sticker price we've seen as of late, do you?

There's a reason the Mustang is so much less expensive than both the Dodge and the Chevy. As underpowered as it may be by comparison, one thing that the 4.6L 3V did do for the Mustang was keep the over all cost down.
Click to expand...

This new DOHC 4 valve 5.0, is to be a mass produced engine, and is not related to the FRPP 5.0 Cammer whatsoever. It's a completely newly designed engine that will also be more fuel efficient over the current 4.6 3- valve, thanks to new engine management control technology.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 26, 2009
#55
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #55
red05bullitgt said:
This new DOHC 4 valve 5.0, is to be a mass produced engine, and is not related to the FRPP 5.0 Cammer whatsoever. It's a completely newly designed engine that will also be more fuel efficient over the current 4.6 3- valve, thanks to new engine management control technology.
Click to expand...

Alright, that's fine and all, but you don't think Ford is going to just throw in a 400hp base V8 into the mix for nothing do you? We're going to end up paying for it on the big end...mass produced or not. Anytime there's a major advancement in the cars design or power train, we pay for it in the sticker.

The price went up from the '93-'94 year with the release of the SN95 chassis, then again from '95 to '96 with the release of the modular engine, again from '98-'99 with the new edge body work and again from '04-'05 with the release of the S197 chassis.....its gone up once again for the reskin of the 2010 model and you can be damn sure its going up again when the new Coyote finds its way between the strut towers. Especially considering that even if they jump the MSRP another $3,000-$4,000, the Mustang will still be several thousand dollars cheaper than either the Dodge, or GM offerings.....still making it the better bargain!
 
8

89FOXVERT

New Member
Dec 18, 2007
4
0
0
Jan 26, 2009
#56
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #56
yeah, when I first saw the pictures of the supposed coyote it made me think SHO. It does slightly resemble it and the SHO motor was a 24V DOHC (the original v6 anyway). Adding two more cylinders would make it a 32V DOHC motor.

Ford also has another engine thats also made by Yamaha that they currently use in some of the Volvo products. The engine is a 4.4 L all aluminum DOHC V8 which produces 311 hp and 325 ft·lbf. It probably would not be hard to punch that out to 5.0 liters and possibly get close to 400 horses. This pic of the motor has a lot of covers on it and is kind of hard to get a good look at it but has the same basic shape.
 

Attachments

  • 800px-2006_Volvo_XC90_V8_engine.webp
    68.2 KB · Views: 240

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan 27, 2009
#57
  • Jan 27, 2009
  • #57
Gearbanger 101 said:
Alright, that's fine and all, but you don't think Ford is going to just throw in a 400hp base V8 into the mix for nothing do you? We're going to end up paying for it on the big end...mass produced or not. Anytime there's a major advancement in the cars design or power train, we pay for it in the sticker.

The price went up from the '93-'94 year with the release of the SN95 chassis, then again from '95 to '96 with the release of the modular engine, again from '98-'99 with the new edge body work and again from '04-'05 with the release of the S197 chassis.....its gone up once again for the reskin of the 2010 model and you can be damn sure its going up again when the new Coyote finds its way between the strut towers. Especially considering that even if they jump the MSRP another $3,000-$4,000, the Mustang will still be several thousand dollars cheaper than either the Dodge, or GM offerings.....still making it the better bargain!
Click to expand...

Will there be a price increase ? Of course there will, however just as you stated. By the time it's all said and done. Mustang will still be several thousand dollars cheaper over the competition...Thus still making it the better bargain
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan 27, 2009
#58
  • Jan 27, 2009
  • #58
89FOXVERT said:
yeah, when I first saw the pictures of the supposed coyote it made me think SHO. It does slightly resemble it and the SHO motor was a 24V DOHC (the original v6 anyway). Adding two more cylinders would make it a 32V DOHC motor.

Ford also has another engine thats also made by Yamaha that they currently use in some of the Volvo products. The engine is a 4.4 L all aluminum DOHC V8 which produces 311 hp and 325 ft·lbf. It probably would not be hard to punch that out to 5.0 liters and possibly get close to 400 horses. This pic of the motor has a lot of covers on it and is kind of hard to get a good look at it but has the same basic shape.
Click to expand...


Very nice find, indeed
 

Attachments

  • 800px-2006_Volvo_XC90_V8_engine.webp
    68.2 KB · Views: 283

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Jan 27, 2009
#59
  • Jan 27, 2009
  • #59
I heard the new Coyote V8 will be made in the Romeo engine plant, where the modular V8s are currently assembled (Windsor is slowing down its production based on what I heard). The modular name comes from the way the plants were designed (to be modular), easily retooled to produce a number of different engines. Since the Coyote is an all-new engine (I heard it is Modular Generation 2), I bet they just swapped out the tooling and used the same production line so there will be minimal cost associated with the new motor. I'm not sure Ford will just make it standard on all GTs from the get-go, it might be only for a special edition car or something. I heard they were making the EcoBoost V6 for a number of cars, perhaps the Mustang GT will get that first?
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Jan 27, 2009
#60
  • Jan 27, 2009
  • #60
Modular also refers to being able to use a wide variety of in stock parts on a block
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
P0024 Timing Over Advanced; 2012 Ford 5.0 Coyote
  • b.sheff
  • Apr 14, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
10K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 21, 2020
b.sheff
B
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
2015 Mustang Designated as the S550 Platform.
  • gearheadboy
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
9K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Nov 4, 2013
ximportdriver
2015 Ford Mustang – Getting Closer!
  • MRaburn
  • Oct 28, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Oct 28, 2013
MRaburn
Auburn Customs Fox Ford Mustang Coyote Pedal Bracket
  • MRaburn
  • Apr 13, 2012
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Apr 13, 2012
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?