• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Ford's 400HP 5.0 (Coyote) V8 spied !

  • Thread starter Thread starter red05bullitgt
  • Start date Start date Jan 21, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 4 of 6 Next Last

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Jan 27, 2009
#61
  • Jan 27, 2009
  • #61
myponyrocks said:
Modular also refers to being able to use a wide variety of in stock parts on a block
Click to expand...

Yes it does in the general sense and coincidentally many of the modular engines have "modular" components, but Modular officially refers to how the plant tooling can be easily changed.

Ford Modular engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ford Modular V-8 Engine - Mustang & Fords Magazine

And another source for this info comes straight from Ford powertrain engineers.
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Jan 27, 2009
#62
  • Jan 27, 2009
  • #62
That's why I didn't say "actually" and said "also" But thanks for the links
 
B

Bl4ckedOutC0bra

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
8
0
0
Jan 29, 2009
#63
  • Jan 29, 2009
  • #63
Very sweet!~ I hadn't seen this before.
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Feb 3, 2009
#64
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #64
I've read several times that this engine was designed with direct injection in mind to come out at a later date, anyone with verification on this??
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Feb 3, 2009
#65
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #65
Unfortunately the bean counters consider a Direct Injection V8, to be too costly..At any rate, I wouldn't expect to see a DI V8 until at least by 2012-13.


In the meantime, sorry that I couldn't be more helpful..
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Feb 3, 2009
#66
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #66
May be better served as the cost/gain of DI may not be worth it as it seems it has a greater advantage with FI engines than NA engines
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Feb 3, 2009
#67
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #67
That's pretty much the opinion over on The Mustang Source as well.
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Feb 3, 2009
#68
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #68
The reason why Ford makes a lot of dumb a$$ decisions is because the bean counters (Accounting and Finance majors) literally run the show. They don't understand value, performance, engineering, quality, or the customer. They look at the bottom line and cost cutting. Look at how far this has gotten them!
 

MustGTCS07

New Member
Oct 23, 2008
13
1
3
South Carolina
Feb 3, 2009
#69
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #69
I have a question. Is the 'new' 5.0L engine the same one that Saleen used in the P. Jones
edition Mustang in 2007? If it is, the we should know how much the Mustang will weigh with this engine.
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Feb 3, 2009
#70
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #70
MustGTCS07 said:
I have a question. Is the 'new' 5.0L engine the same one that Saleen used in the P. Jones
edition Mustang in 2007? If it is, the we should know how much the Mustang will weigh with this engine.
Click to expand...

No, this Coyote is a different engine family altogether (4V, DOHC, Modular Gen 2). The 5.0 used in the PJ Saleen was based on the current Modular 4.6L 3V V8.
 

ThePumpkin

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
55
0
0
Missouri
Feb 3, 2009
#71
  • Feb 3, 2009
  • #71
Well damn... I was all happy because I got the last year of the 5.0... I guess I better enjoy it while it lasts.
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Feb 4, 2009
#72
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #72
metroplex said:
The reason why Ford makes a lot of dumb a$$ decisions is because the bean counters (Accounting and Finance majors) literally run the show. They don't understand value, performance, engineering, quality, or the customer. They look at the bottom line and cost cutting. Look at how far this has gotten them!
Click to expand...

Funny you mention this, I'm currently going to school to become a mechanical engineer and my best friend and girl friend are both going to school for accounting, i'm sure we'll strike up some interesting conversation in two years or so when we hit the job market, that is if there are any jobs left to be found.
 
B

bifs66

Founding Member
May 1, 2000
146
0
0
Feb 4, 2009
#73
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #73
From what I've been able to find out , the new 5.0 DOHC V8 is not a MOD based engine. Most importantly, the bore spacing has been increased. It was the MOD's bore spacing that kept its cubes (and therefore N/A HP) somewhat limited in spite of its physical size and weight. The 5.0 "CAMMER" is an expensive race piece and is not related to the new 5.0 Mustang V8. Having watched the development of the MOD engine way back when, it was called a "modular" engine in that it could be made in various configurations/displacements by simply adding extra cylinders. Initially, it was to have 6, 8, and 10 cylinder versions; but the V6 was never developed. Interestingly, Ford has their hands in several new V8 projects: The Ford 500 NHRA funny car engine, the new FR9 NASCAR race engine, the new 5.0 DOHC V8, and the new 6.2 SOHC V8 going into the Raptor truck. IMO, all of these engine projects are filling a long awaited "wish list" for Ford fans.
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Feb 4, 2009
#74
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #74
bifs66 said:
From what I've been able to find out , the new 5.0 DOHC V8 is not a MOD based engine. Most importantly, the bore spacing has been increased. It was the MOD's bore spacing that kept its cubes (and therefore N/A HP) somewhat limited in spite of its physical size and weight. The 5.0 "CAMMER" is an expensive race piece and is not related to the new 5.0 Mustang V8. Having watched the development of the MOD engine way back when, it was called a "modular" engine in that it could be made in various configurations/displacements by simply adding extra cylinders. Initially, it was to have 6, 8, and 10 cylinder versions; but the V6 was never developed. Interestingly, Ford has their hands in several new V8 projects: The Ford 500 NHRA funny car engine, the new FR9 NASCAR race engine, the new 5.0 DOHC V8, and the new 6.2 SOHC V8 going into the Raptor truck. IMO, all of these engine projects are filling a long awaited "wish list" for Ford fans.
Click to expand...

So if the new 5.0 DOHC V8, is not a MOD based engine, then exactly what kind of engine design will it become ? Other than an OHV version, what else could it possibly be...Unless it's a DOHC version of the 5.0 (302) engine
 
G

Gregor111

Member
Sep 23, 2008
95
0
6
Spokane, WA
Feb 4, 2009
#75
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #75
metroplex said:
The reason why Ford makes a lot of dumb a$$ decisions is because the bean counters (Accounting and Finance majors) literally run the show. They don't understand value, performance, engineering, quality, or the customer. They look at the bottom line and cost cutting. Look at how far this has gotten them!
Click to expand...

And if they hadn't run the show Ford would be where GM is.

Greg
 

AvalancheSVT

10 Year Member
Jun 12, 2005
573
37
49
Feb 4, 2009
#76
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #76
metroplex said:
The reason why Ford makes a lot of dumb a$$ decisions is because the bean counters (Accounting and Finance majors) literally run the show. They don't understand value, performance, engineering, quality, or the customer. They look at the bottom line and cost cutting. Look at how far this has gotten them!
Click to expand...

guess what? the bean counters are the only reason ford isn't at the capitol begging for a handout right now.

conservative progression is ford's strategy while chevy and dodge have been measuring their cocks for the last 30 years. cool, chevy has fifteen versions of the same car and a corvette that is pretty stellar... and a huuuuuuuuuuge hole in their pocket.

you boys need to stop whining and thanking God that ford knows how to make a car that sells.
 
B

bifs66

Founding Member
May 1, 2000
146
0
0
Feb 4, 2009
#77
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #77
All the info points to a NEW engine family...not MOD and not 5.0 Windsor OHV. With larger bore centers than the MOD, it could easily grow beyond 5.0. I'm sure they incorporated lessons learned through the years of MOD development; and came up with more power in a smaller, lighter package.
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Feb 5, 2009
#78
  • Feb 5, 2009
  • #78
bifs66 said:
All the info points to a NEW engine family...not MOD and not 5.0 Windsor OHV. With larger bore centers than the MOD, it could easily grow beyond 5.0. I'm sure they incorporated lessons learned through the years of MOD development; and came up with more power in a smaller, lighter package.
Click to expand...

It's a totally new engine, but the Modular was called modular because of the plant technology where they can make different configurations by switching out the tooling.

MakotoS13 said:
guess what? the bean counters are the only reason ford isn't at the capitol begging for a handout right now.

conservative progression is ford's strategy while chevy and dodge have been measuring their cocks for the last 30 years. cool, chevy has fifteen versions of the same car and a corvette that is pretty stellar... and a huuuuuuuuuuge hole in their pocket.

you boys need to stop whining and thanking God that ford knows how to make a car that sells.
Click to expand...

No, the reason Ford didn't ask for money is because Mulally hedged his risks in 2006 and started securing funds early on from banks when they were lending it like crazy. He mortgaged assets, plants, etc... and it gave him an extra year of breathing room compared to GM and Chrysler. However the ROOT CAUSE of the Big 3's problem is that they let bean counters run the show for too long. The Big 3 will happily decontent a small bolt to shave a penny off a car without realizing the effect of this.

I have spoken to many former Big 3 employees that have talked about regular meetings to discuss cost cutting. The bean counters are running the show but they fail to see the long-term strategy: customer and product. Without focusing on either element, your company can cut costs until the cows home but you're not going to survive on the market.
 
S

snakekiller

New Member
Jan 24, 2009
14
0
0
Feb 6, 2009
#79
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #79
have you guys read the new motortrend test of the 2010 gt man its got impressive numbers with the track pack 0 to 60 in 4.9 seconds
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Feb 6, 2009
#80
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #80
snakekiller said:
have you guys read the new motortrend test of the 2010 gt man its got impressive numbers with the track pack 0 to 60 in 4.9 seconds
Click to expand...

0-60 in 4.9 is what the 2005 Mustang GT ran.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 4 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
P0024 Timing Over Advanced; 2012 Ford 5.0 Coyote
  • b.sheff
  • Apr 14, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
10K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 21, 2020
b.sheff
B
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
2015 Mustang Designated as the S550 Platform.
  • gearheadboy
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
9K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Nov 4, 2013
ximportdriver
2015 Ford Mustang – Getting Closer!
  • MRaburn
  • Oct 28, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Oct 28, 2013
MRaburn
Auburn Customs Fox Ford Mustang Coyote Pedal Bracket
  • MRaburn
  • Apr 13, 2012
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Apr 13, 2012
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?