• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Gear ratio change

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josmen
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Josmen

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2001
160
0
16
California
Oct 9, 2006
#1
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #1
alright, I have a 96' gt, 5spd that has some worn out 3.27 gears in the 8.8 rearend. If put in 3.55 gears what kind of difference would I be looking at in driving characteristics. From what I understand I will lose some top end but it will pick up a little faster off the line. Not quite sure how much I will lose and am curious. Thanks

Dan
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Oct 9, 2006
#2
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #2
I dont have gears in my Mustang yet, but I can tell you 3.27 to 3.55 would be pointless.

3.73 is the lowest you should go. Pretty much everyone will tell you 4.10's and no less. But 3.73's will offer a decent improvment (according to all that have them) and still cruise nicely down the highway. Keep in mind you will tach higher going down the highway than with stock gears.
 

goshia

New Member
Jul 1, 2005
252
0
0
Mead, Colorado
Oct 9, 2006
#3
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #3
3.55 will help very little and you wound notice a big change in performance, once you go to 3.73's you will be running at higher rmp's that you will notice during highway driving. then at 4.10 the rpm increase could get to a level that might make you a littel nuts on a long highway drive.

check out: http://www.weather-check.com/3_73_gear_&_pinion.htm

 

Josmen

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2001
160
0
16
California
Oct 9, 2006
#4
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #4
Well, the 3.27 gears are wearing bad and starting to howl, and I have the 3.55 gears for free and not a lot of cash to buy new ones anyways. So just to get it back on the road I think I might go with the 3.55 gears. Thanks for the info!

Dan
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 9, 2006
#5
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #5
well the install, if ur paying, costs more than the gears so....
 

Josmen

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2001
160
0
16
California
Oct 9, 2006
#6
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #6
A guy at a shop behind my work does gears on the side, so I am getting them put in for $100 so it isn't too bad.

Dan
 
M

Mel96GT

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
255
1
0
San Diego
Oct 10, 2006
#7
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #7
Josmen said:
Well, the 3.27 gears are wearing bad and starting to howl, and I have the 3.55 gears for free and not a lot of cash to buy new ones anyways. So just to get it back on the road I think I might go with the 3.55 gears. Thanks for the info!

Dan
Click to expand...

For that cheap go for it! Anything is better than those 3.27's. The 3.55's are actually perfect with the stock NPI cams, IMHO, since the stock NPI engine redlines at 4500 rpm and it is slightly torquier at low rpm's than the PI engine. With 3.27's I would do 70 at 2100 rpm's, where now with 3.55's I do 70 at 2300 rpm's.

You will notice improved acceleration (at least I did) with 3.55's, and your gas mileage and top end will be the same. In fact, a friend of mine started installing 3.55's in some of the Crown Victoria cop cars he services and the guys love them since the acceleration is improved without affecting top end. Don't forget to buy a new 3.55 speedo gear for the tranny. I don't think you will be too disappointed. Let us know how you like them.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Oct 10, 2006
#8
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #8
4.10s for NA cars

3.73s for turbo/SC/n2o

You'll spin all day long with a KB 1.7 SC and 4.10's
 
M

MBDiagMan

Member
Sep 22, 2006
171
2
19
Lamar County, Texas
Oct 10, 2006
#9
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #9
Going to a lower gear (higher numerically) will likely INCREASE your top speed, not lower it. This is due to the torque multiplication allowing the engine to overcome the wind resistance and other factors that fight against faster speed.

These cars have overdrive final ratios and high RPM torque peaks. 4.10's are not unreasonable gears, even for highway driving.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Oct 10, 2006
#10
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #10
Mel96GT said:
For that cheap go for it! Anything is better than those 3.27's. The 3.55's are actually perfect with the stock NPI cams, IMHO, since the stock NPI engine redlines at 4500 rpm and it is slightly torquier at low rpm's than the PI engine. With 3.27's I would do 70 at 2100 rpm's, where now with 3.55's I do 70 at 2300 rpm's.

You will notice improved acceleration (at least I did) with 3.55's, and your gas mileage and top end will be the same. In fact, a friend of mine started installing 3.55's in some of the Crown Victoria cop cars he services and the guys love them since the acceleration is improved without affecting top end. Don't forget to buy a new 3.55 speedo gear for the tranny. I don't think you will be too disappointed. Let us know how you like them.
Click to expand...

yep... I'm not sure how much the 3.55s helped me since I didn't install them but they aren't too bad for my stock heads and cams and the gas mileage on the highway is still pretty good. If the gears are free and install is cheap, then you may as well go for it. Don't forget your car will feel a lot tighter on WOT runs with a freshly built rear so thats one bonus of getting these gears put in.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Oct 10, 2006
#11
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #11
MBDiagMan said:
Going to a lower gear (higher numerically) will likely INCREASE your top speed, not lower it. This is due to the torque multiplication allowing the engine to overcome the wind resistance and other factors that fight against faster speed.

These cars have overdrive final ratios and high RPM torque peaks. 4.10's are not unreasonable gears, even for highway driving.
Click to expand...


I hope your joking about top speeds...that's the math.

Engine RPM: 6200
Vehicle Speed: 186.755285063091
Read End Gear: 3.73

Engine RPM: 6200
Vehicle Speed: 213.026670729459
Read End Gear: 3.27
 
M

Mel96GT

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
255
1
0
San Diego
Oct 10, 2006
#12
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #12
merc123 said:
I hope your joking about top speeds...that's the math.

Engine RPM: 6200
Vehicle Speed: 186.755285063091
Read End Gear: 3.73

Engine RPM: 6200
Vehicle Speed: 213.026670729459
Read End Gear: 3.27
Click to expand...

That math only works if the car is in a vacuum, i.e. no atmosphere. The reality is wind resistance which is a function of the square of the speed. That is what MBDiagMan was alluding to. It basically takes twice the energy to go 100 mph compared to 70 mph because of wind resistance. That is where the torque multiplication comes in with lower gears. A Mustang with 3.27's will NEVER get to 213 mph without a heavily modded engine and aerodynamics.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Oct 10, 2006
#13
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #13
Mel96GT said:
That math only works if the car is in a vacuum, i.e. no atmosphere. The reality is wind resistance which is a function of the square of the speed. That is what MBDiagMan was alluding to. It basically takes twice the energy to go 100 mph compared to 70 mph because of wind resistance. That is where the torque multiplication comes in with lower gears. A Mustang with 3.27's will NEVER get to 213 mph without a heavily modded engine and aerodynamics.
Click to expand...

The max theoretical speed of a car will always decrease as it gets geared lower (ie, going from 3.27 to 4.10). At the same time, however, the max attainable speed will increase due to the extra torque multiplication giving your car the ability the extra power to overcome wind resistance.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Oct 10, 2006
#14
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #14
stangGT97 said:
The max theoretical speed of a car will always decrease as it gets geared lower (ie, going from 3.27 to 4.10). At the same time, however, the max attainable speed will increase due to the extra torque multiplication giving your car the ability the extra power to overcome wind resistance.
Click to expand...

What? You mean he your car wouldn't go 213mph stock? You better get it check out. You must have gotten a lemon.
 

steveb24

New Member
Nov 28, 2005
555
0
0
wilmington, DE
Oct 11, 2006
#15
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #15
that math looks good and all, but remember we are on earth, and are not driving ferari's
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Oct 11, 2006
#16
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #16
Go with 3.73's or 4.10's and never look back. It's that simple. Your car will thank you for it.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Oct 11, 2006
#17
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #17
jstreet0204 said:
What? You mean he your car wouldn't go 213mph stock? You better get it check out. You must have gotten a lemon.
Click to expand...

My car has the NPI speed limiter mod

Did my reasoning not make sense?
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Oct 11, 2006
#18
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #18
stangGT97 said:
My car has the NPI speed limiter mod

Did my reasoning not make sense?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I understand. I put 4.10's in as a speed limiter. 200mph + was just a little too fast for me. I figured if I could only do 180 it would be a little safer
 

speedfreak98r

Banned
Jan 31, 2006
0
0
0
Houston Area
Oct 11, 2006
#19
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #19
How fast can one go with 4.10s with a bolt on NPI car..I've been wondering about top end/gear ratios..Maybe a sticky on the subject?
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Oct 11, 2006
#20
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #20
jstreet0204 said:
Yeah, I understand. I put 4.10's in as a speed limiter. 200mph + was just a little too fast for me. I figured if I could only do 180 it would be a little safer
Click to expand...

Yeah. In all honesty, with 3.55s my car does not want to go past like 4000ish in 5th gear (tried once, it didnt work). All I get is a roaring engine and a constant speed
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
453
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sunday at 1:36 PM
joeybuddy96
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
749
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Drivetrain Speedo gear ate itself
  • keel
  • Aug 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 15, 2024
AeroCoupe
G
Expired 2013 Ford Mustang V6 (Grabber Blue) 3:55 gears... Excellent Condition.
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
2
Views
438
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 11, 2026
Grabberblueguy77
G
Drivetrain Fox Power Loss While In Gear
  • J_5.0_VERT
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2024
J_5.0_VERT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?