• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Got My Car Dyno'd

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreekStang85
  • Start date Start date Jan 5, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Jan 5, 2007
#1
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #1
With the mods listed below i managed to push out 229 WHP and 261 WTQ. Do these Numbers sound right to you with my mods listed. How much would a throttlebody and plenum combo and SCT Xcal benefit me?
 

flames201

New Member
Dec 23, 2004
77
0
0
st. amant, la
Jan 5, 2007
#2
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #2
tb and plenum should give you arround 15-20 more hp. and a set of underdrive pulleys will give you arround 5-7 more hp.good #'s for the mods though. if you want something that will make a bigger seat of the pants difference, put some 4:10's in that ass!
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Jan 5, 2007
#3
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #3
i have 3.73's in
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Jan 5, 2007
#4
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #4
DONT FEAR THE GEAR !!!
 

flames201

New Member
Dec 23, 2004
77
0
0
st. amant, la
Jan 5, 2007
#5
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #5
i put down 252/295 with the same stuff you have plus 75mm tb,c&l plenum, and underdrive pulleys. my prochamber is offroad, and i have the magnapack catback. i am using the sct x-cal2 as well.


what is your a.f. ? and what tuner do you have?
 

four six

Member
Jan 19, 2006
506
2
18
Hobart, IN
Jan 5, 2007
#6
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #6
AUTO or 5 speed?
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Jan 5, 2007
#7
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #7
i didnt have an a/f reading when i got dyno'd
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Jan 5, 2007
#8
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #8
5 speed manual, i dont have a tuner on my car
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Jan 5, 2007
#9
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #9
mustang or dynojet. Sounds a tad low on dynojet but on the numbers for mustang dyno. Just my .02.
Search dyno thread or check the one that's a sticky. N/A mods don't do much on our cars. If you can, save for S/C.
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Jan 5, 2007
#10
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #10
this was on a dyno dynamics dyno. its said to be one of the most accurate dyno's on the market.
 

Duke309

Member
Oct 15, 2005
90
0
6
Orlando, FL
Jan 5, 2007
#11
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #11
flames201 said:
tb and plenum should give you arround 15-20 more hp. and a set of underdrive pulleys will give you arround 5-7 more hp.good #'s for the mods though. if you want something that will make a bigger seat of the pants difference, put some 4:10's in that ass!
Click to expand...

70 or 75 mm tb and plenum have been dyno proven to only gain about 5-7 hp
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 5, 2007
#12
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #12
yea, i was gonna say 8rwhp tops for t/b plunum combo!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 5, 2007
#13
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #13
four six said:
AUTO or 5 speed?
Click to expand...

Well, considering in his list of mods he's got a Steeda Tri-Ax shifter, I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and say his car's a stick.
 

BlueRuckus

New Member
Jun 30, 2005
204
1
0
Miami, FL
Jan 5, 2007
#14
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #14
I got this with mods listed. I got the car dyno'd, not tuned.

75mm TB & Plenum
Steeda CAI
Pulleys
2/12" O/R X-pipe
2/12" Flowmaster Catback
Predator with performance 93 octane tune installed
180* Termo
3.73s

 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Jan 5, 2007
#15
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #15
Not saying you didn't, but 267.79 RWHP / 312.20 TQ is a bit high, esp the HP.

Auto or stick?
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 5, 2007
#16
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #16
yea, thats real high. just goes to show how different dynos are. the thread starter's numbers are low for the mods, and this guys are high for the mods.

i guess dynos are only good for personal referance to see what each mod adds to your own car. also to see where you started and where you end up, just to make sure all the money spent is actually producing power.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 5, 2007
#17
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #17
his torque is way off too. when i had his same mods minus the pullies i was dynoed at 280rwtq! thats a 32 rwtq difference!!!!
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Jan 5, 2007
#18
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #18
He may have an auto that did not have the TC locked during dyno, and it read the spike when the TC locked up. That could explain the abnormally high HP and TQ.
 

BlueRuckus

New Member
Jun 30, 2005
204
1
0
Miami, FL
Jan 5, 2007
#19
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #19
san~man said:
Not saying you didn't, but 267.79 RWHP / 312.20 TQ is a bit high, esp the HP.

Auto or stick?
Click to expand...

Stick.

The car had been sitting for a while so it was cool and I only ran it one time. I had a few things done to the car that day and i was going to have them dyno tune it, but i left my tuner at home like a dumb ass. Anyway, i did a base run just to see where my air/fuel was.

Even the guys in the office were a bit impressed, or at least they seemed to be. It is not a true average because it was only one pass.

Oh yeah. The Steeda place is also right at, or just below see level. That will also affect your numbers.

I sometimes hear that because of the range in tolerances at the factory, that some motors may come out a bit stronger than others. Some times i tend to think that cause of my previous time at the track. Again just below see level and at around 60 degree temp. before TB & P, or Pulleys, i pulled:

60' 2.223
1/8 9.004
MPH 80.07
1000 11.708
1/4 13.922
MPH 102.20
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 5, 2007
#20
  • Jan 5, 2007
  • #20
BlueRuckus said:
Stick.

The car had been sitting for a while so it was cool and I only ran it one time. I had a few things done to the car that day and i was going to have them dyno tune it, but i left my tuner at home like a dumb ass. Anyway, i did a base run just to see where my air/fuel was.

Even the guys in the office were a bit impressed, or at least they seemed to be. It is not a true average because it was only one pass.

Oh yeah. The Steeda place is also right at, or just below see level. That will also affect your numbers.

I sometimes hear that because of the range in tolerances at the factory, that some motors may come out a bit stronger than others. Some times i tend to think that cause of my previous time at the track. Again just below see level and at around 60 degree temp. before TB & P, or Pulleys, i pulled:

60' 2.223
1/8 9.004
MPH 80.07
1000 11.708
1/4 13.922
MPH 102.20
Click to expand...

There is wrong with your dyno numbers at all. That sounds like some good numbers given your mods. Nothing out of the ordinary at all, especially considering a "cool pull".

Nice numbers. BTW, I won't even bother posting my N/A numbers on here because I know nobody would believe me.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
252
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
Finally having time to prepare the ad for the 2000 GT conv remaining parts my shop has
  • Tods Hot Rods
  • Sep 17, 2024
  • Feedback Area | Testing Zone
Replies
1
Views
192
Feedback Area | Testing Zone Sep 17, 2024
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
849
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
530
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?