• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How much power to expect from Pro-M 75mm Bullit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter axeman
  • Start date Start date Jul 9, 2004

axeman

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2001
1,348
0
36
Elizabethtown, PA
Jul 9, 2004
#1
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #1
can I expect 10HP and maybe drop a tenth in the quarter? I just ordered on and should have it soon. Then I'll get to the track and see what happens. Of course, it'll have to be after I replace this stupid water pump that started leaking on me.
 
B

blk92stangg

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
583
0
0
Hawaii
Jul 10, 2004
#2
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #2
I went to a 73mm on a stock engine, and really didn't feel much difference. Your intake may breathe a little better with it, but I assume you didn't change the lower, so I think the difference will be minimal at best. Sorry. Hope you prove me wrong at the track
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
Jul 10, 2004
#3
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #3
blk92stangg said:
I went to a 73mm on a stock engine, and really didn't feel much difference. Your intake may breathe a little better with it, but I assume you didn't change the lower, so I think the difference will be minimal at best. Sorry. Hope you prove me wrong at the track
Click to expand...
Hes got the trick flow intake, so it will breath better than stock, but I don't see any heads to help out the intake.
 

axeman

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2001
1,348
0
36
Elizabethtown, PA
Jul 10, 2004
#4
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #4
i do have the upper and lower tfs intake. you can't put the upper on without the lower. different pattern. sometimes it's hard to feel a seat of the pants improvement, but when i put the intake on i did find a 2mph gain and dropped 2 tenths in the quarter. so the intake works well with the stock heads.

hopefully i get the MAM soon and next sunday i might be going to the All Ford at 75/80. weather probably won't be the best though. usually pretty hot and humid the day of that event.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 10, 2004
#5
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #5
I ordered the Pro-M 75mm Bullit and it's going on my FTI combo...hopefully I'll get started on it today...the piece is pretty nice (chrome )
 

dvs bullet

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
326
0
0
Ontario, Canada
Jul 10, 2004
#6
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #6
just put one on mine and I didn't notice that much on the low end but once I got to the top end YEHH HAWWWW! I don't Know what that dynos out at but I found that it helped me alot , I've got 65mm tb, Ported intake and heads and exhaust work so that was one of the bottle necks.
 
A

autoXr1

Founding Member
May 3, 2001
1,838
0
0
Michigan
Jul 10, 2004
#7
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #7
If you are replacing the stock 55mm meter, then you may experience a little more on the top end, but typically, you don't feel much with general daily driving. Your heads are the real bottleneck in the system. It doesn't matter what kind of intake and exhaust mods you have if the heads are the restriction.

I am fully aware of the cost of great head-cam-intake combo, but I think you will be a little disappointed with the amount, if any, power you gain from a mass air meter swap. Ford gave us all "wheezer" emissions heads that die at around 5500 RPM, or less. Make yourself a little account and safe your dollars for a blower or decent head-cam-intake combo. You won't be disappointed. Instead of 5 HP gain, you may be looking at over 100 HP gain.
 
Q

Quick5pnt0

Founding Member
Aug 21, 1999
1,208
0
36
north eastern PA
Jul 10, 2004
#8
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #8
On my 94 cobra i did notice a pretty good SOTP power increase with the addition of a 75mm Pro-m and 65mm TB installed at the same time. I'm not saying it was like a nitrous shot or anything like that but definately noticable.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 10, 2004
#9
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #9
autoxr1 hit it - the stock mass air meter is capable of flowing enough air to meet your engine's needs even as it's modified - in other words, it's not a bottleneck. I wouldn't expect any gain from the ProM alone.
 

dvs bullet

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
326
0
0
Ontario, Canada
Jul 11, 2004
#10
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #10
but it does help bring out the performance of other mods that you have done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
868
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
T
power steering and brake problems at high rpms on road courses
  • The Blurr
  • May 27, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
152
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2025
The Blurr
T
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
916
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
497
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
A
Resolved 03 GT Parasitic Draw Fuse 26 (PCM)
  • Antrix
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
723
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 24, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?