• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

I want 10's

  • Thread starter Thread starter phatboysh
  • Start date Start date Oct 2, 2005
P

phatboysh

New Member
May 14, 2004
27
0
0
Oct 2, 2005
#1
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #1
current combo- 347ci, 8.5:1 probes, p1sc/ 12lb pulley, gt40x's, e-cam, 1.7s, gt40 upper/ lower, 42 lbers, art carr aode, aluminum d/s, 3.73 cogs

Best so far 11.95 at 113. Traction was there, rev limiter at top end was also there in 3rd, and a/f ratio was dialed in perfect. Cannot launch any higher than 1800. whats going to be needed to hit 10s? im swapping to a g force tranny this winter.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Oct 2, 2005
#2
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #2
Why can't you launch higher than 1800? Launching at 1800 you are going to need alot more power. A 125-150 shot will probably put you on the line of 10.99 and 11.00.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Oct 2, 2005
#3
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #3
9 more psi
 

1EVIL88VERT

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
314
0
0
Dyess AFB, TX
Oct 2, 2005
#4
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #4
methanol injection, slicks, drop some weight....what are your 60ft times?
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Oct 2, 2005
#5
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #5
dam wheres the mph?

i trapped at 110 but only got a 12.9 out of it
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Oct 2, 2005
#6
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #6
get a chip and raise your rev limiter aod cars have a lower rev limit don't they ?
 
P

phatboysh

New Member
May 14, 2004
27
0
0
Oct 3, 2005
#7
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #7
60 fts - 1.80 flat
red line- 6400 rpm (tweecer)
tuning- tweecer r/t
mph- im hitting the red line in 3rd, im not going to even try using the aode overdrive, this combined with my converter launching woes im switching to a stick

i thought the larger 3 core i/c, a 14lb pulley, head and intake porting, 50lb injectors, tubular k-member, a-arms & coil overs, and a new cam might do the job combined with the stick and a taller tire with skinnies in the front (still full size street tires up front)
 
S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned
Mar 31, 2005
991
1
0
Philly
Oct 3, 2005
#8
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #8
phatboysh said:
60 fts - 1.80 flat
red line- 6400 rpm (tweecer)
tuning- tweecer r/t
mph- im hitting the red line in 3rd, im not going to even try using the aode overdrive, this combined with my converter launching woes im switching to a stick

i thought the larger 3 core i/c, a 14lb pulley, head and intake porting, 50lb injectors, tubular k-member, a-arms & coil overs, and a new cam might do the job combined with the stick and a taller tire with skinnies in the front (still full size street tires up front)
Click to expand...

How bout a better h/i combo? TW or AFR 185's with a better flowing intake.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 3, 2005
#9
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #9
Something definitely doesn't sound right. Why can't you launch higher than 1800? That is what appears to be your biggest limitation to me as you will need to laucnh harder to pull some better 60's, although you will need a bit more trap speed to see 10's. 113 is good for around a 11.7 or so if conditions are right. What tires are you running? Even with 3.73's and a standard 26" high tire you should NOT be hitting the limiter set at 6400 with only a 113mph trap speed. Is the converter slipping that much on you? What is the 1/8th mile ET and MPH?

Was the car ever dyno'd? What rpm are you shifting/letting it shift at?
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Oct 3, 2005
#10
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #10
Where are you located? I used to trap higher then you with stock shortblock and stock h/c.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Oct 3, 2005
#11
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #11
Blower car, and full weight...
You need atleast 125mph traps and 1.5 60s
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 3, 2005
#12
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #12
Switch to a turbo.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Oct 3, 2005
#13
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #13
Why his blower is plenty to go 10s
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Oct 3, 2005
#14
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #14
A bunch of these suggestions are going to do nothing - the car flat out is messed up. You could bolt E6 heads to a stock 302 block, zing it off the rev limiter with a blower and go 11's.

Porting the heads is a waste. You're moving into a largely diminishing return. Same with the intake - if you need to port a street-style intake, you'd probably be better off with a different manifold all together.

This IS NOT a 302. In theory it can use the same parts, but, it really cannot from a performance standpoint. Those heads are for a 302, the cam would run good in a carb'd N/A 289, and the manifold is just enough for a 302. Your results (since everyone thinks they're bad) don't surprise me too much, especially with the automatic. 11.70's would be surprising (to me, anyway).

This is what I'd do....

1) Sell the top-end for bigger/better used stuff.
2) 3000-3200 10" lock-up converter.
3) Transbrake
4) Slicks

Joe
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 3, 2005
#15
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #15
Like Joe said, the parts are VERY small. But the big problem is you're hitting the limiter. You need to raise that. How was your tune? Timing? A/f ratio? Fu ck porting this stuff, you need to fix that rev limiter and verify your tune. The boost will help 'fix' your restrictions.
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Oct 3, 2005
#16
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #16
More boost, get the converter set-up correctly, transbrake, more RPM on the rev limiter, and 3.55s.

Troy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?