Ok. I'll preface this as I have in the past in that this is TOTALLY 100% theoretical! Don't climb down my throat hollering left and right that this or that won't happen. Trust me I know it won't but it's slow around here and I want to spark some debate.
Soo....Let's say Ford decided to make a sub 20k V8 in addition to the GT. BUT let's say the sub 20k V8 was 19,995 AND it had an IRS set up. Here's the catch...it's only got the 2v 260 horse V8 still in the V6 body let's call it the GTS. And the GT will have the 3v 4.6 with live axle and all the looks and it'll be 25k. And for further fuel on the fire it becomes very evident that modding the 2v mod for mod will NEVER produce the gains for the 3v. Your 2v bolt on mods will get you say...30 horses while the same mod on the 3v will free up say 50.
The GTS will be faster in everyway stock around the track and the GT will be much faster down the strip and will have greater potential.
Which would you pick?
Soo....Let's say Ford decided to make a sub 20k V8 in addition to the GT. BUT let's say the sub 20k V8 was 19,995 AND it had an IRS set up. Here's the catch...it's only got the 2v 260 horse V8 still in the V6 body let's call it the GTS. And the GT will have the 3v 4.6 with live axle and all the looks and it'll be 25k. And for further fuel on the fire it becomes very evident that modding the 2v mod for mod will NEVER produce the gains for the 3v. Your 2v bolt on mods will get you say...30 horses while the same mod on the 3v will free up say 50.
The GTS will be faster in everyway stock around the track and the GT will be much faster down the strip and will have greater potential.
Which would you pick?