• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is an RPM to much for stock

  • Thread starter Thread starter scorp69
  • Start date Start date Feb 29, 2004
S

scorp69

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
605
0
0
California
Feb 29, 2004
#1
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #1
will putting an rpm manifold be to much for stock heads and cam. i have equal length headers, mag x pipe and exhaust, 65tb, 1.7 RR.
 

Brian992V

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2000
880
0
0
Lexington,KY
Mar 1, 2004
#2
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #2
Absolutely, Get a Performer.
 

runningmole

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
1,127
0
36
San Diego, CA
Mar 1, 2004
#3
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #3
No. You might notice a bit of tq loss at low rpm, but it's nothing that's going to make your car a turd. Plus, if it's part of your future goals, why waste money purchasing more than 1 intake. If you're worried about it, buy something else right now w/ that money that will help your car more.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Mar 1, 2004
#4
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #4
RPM!

your not really gonna notice much low end power loss if you get a set of gears. they will even that right out and some. if you plan on going with a set of heads or any more mods, go with the RPM... the top end was amazing on my 302 when it was stock with a 65mm t-body and 4.10s.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Mar 1, 2004
#5
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #5
stock heads and cam, no way he needs a RPM.
 
S

scorp69

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
605
0
0
California
Mar 1, 2004
#6
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #6
cool,i'll put it on. i have 3.73. the problem is I put a very ported upper/lower stock, but for some reason the drivers intake side is causing a bad vacuum leak. at first i thought it was the gaskets, but put new ones on. I can notice a big difference, flows free, but that vacuum leak is the issue. I'll put the rpm on. if any needs a ported upper, pm me. its been ported by rick anderson back in the day(according to the guy i bought it from).
 
B

Bad Animal

Founding Member
Nov 18, 2000
97
0
0
Toledo, OH
Mar 1, 2004
#7
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #7
IF you really want to change intakes go with the regular performer and then in the future if you want to move up to an rpm, all you would have to buy would be the upper. They share the same lower. If I were you I would upgrade my mass air flow first, this is the biggest bottle neck you have in your intake track. I recommend a C&L 73 or even a 76.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Dipstick
  • wccurtis1963
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
227
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
Willybill32
J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
358
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2026
Qtrhrse23
D
Exhaust Difficulty of fixing exhaust leak at manifold
  • dqureshi06
  • Aug 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
290
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2026
General karthief
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
721
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
159
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?