• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Kaase SB-Ford Cylinder Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joeverb
  • Start date Start date Jan 26, 2004

Joeverb

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2000
440
0
0
Jan 26, 2004
#1
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #1
http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ProductDisplay?prrfnbr=156886&prmenbr=361

Anyone else read the article in Car Craft on these new heads?
They are not particularly cheap with all the proprietary components you have to purchase with it but the numbers it put down with only minimal modifications on a worn out fox body 5.0 were darned impressive.
 

75stang302

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
1,036
0
36
u.s.a.
Jan 26, 2004
#2
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #2
thats a great idea with the canted valves
 
M

myfirstii

Founding Member
Feb 28, 2002
401
0
16
chicago,Il.
Jan 26, 2004
#3
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #3
Is that hp in the article to the wheels or Flywheel???
 

Joeverb

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2000
440
0
0
Jan 27, 2004
#4
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #4
Im under the impression its flywheel HP. Still the thing came to friggin life with a bigger cam and those heads. Now if only i had $1800.
 
D

danimaltheanima

New Member
Dec 3, 2003
181
0
0
Jan 27, 2004
#5
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #5
heads

Wow those heads do sound good. I'm using GT-40 heads on my 302 and its makin 425hp @ 6500 rpm. If I put these Kaase heads on there I'd be well up into the 500's. I think I'm happy with what I got right now though. But I will keep those Kaase heads in mind for future mods. I like em

Dan
 
H

HaveII

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2001
272
0
0
Houston, TX
Jan 27, 2004
#6
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #6
Those heads do sound awesome, impressive results. What surpised me is the stock 100k engine not blowing up when turned nearly 8k rpms. So if I read this article correctly then if I bought these heads I could run a small solid roller cam and not have to worry about notching the pistons because of the relocated valve position? I could use my headers and intake and buy new valve covers. I already have a set of the solid roller lifters with the H connectors, but I think I would need some new roller rockers since mine are for smaller studs.
 
7

77sleeper

GO BUCS!
Founding Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,266
0
0
Napalm, AZ
Jan 27, 2004
#7
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #7
$2k? ouch
 
T

THE COBRAMAN

pig 'rassler
Founding Member
Mar 11, 1999
1,974
0
36
Oklahoma
Jan 27, 2004
#8
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #8
Sound pretty good! Comparably priced to the other similar heads on the market from what I can tell, and the name Jon Kaase means a lot to those of us that have been around a while.

Kaase was laying down BIG horsepower numbers with Ford hardware in the dark ages long before the 5.0 revolution put bolt-on HP in the hands of every little whippersnapper with daddy's Visa card.
 
Z

zwhitr

Founding Member
Aug 26, 2001
847
0
16
Goldsboro, NC
Jan 28, 2004
#9
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #9
danimaltheanima said:
Wow those heads do sound good. I'm using GT-40 heads on my 302 and its makin 425hp @ 6500 rpm. If I put these Kaase heads on there I'd be well up into the 500's. I think I'm happy with what I got right now though. But I will keep those Kaase heads in mind for future mods. I like em

Dan
Click to expand...


I love numbers as much as the next guy but how streetable is a 250 degree cam pulling 500 hp and solid lifters.
 

Joeverb

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2000
440
0
0
Jan 28, 2004
#10
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #10
zwhitr said:
I love numbers as much as the next guy but how streetable is a 250 degree cam pulling 500 hp and solid lifters.
Click to expand...

Well ive always preferred solid lifters but as for the streetable issue i think it would be just fine with a manual trans or a good stall on a juice trans.
 
M

myfirstii

Founding Member
Feb 28, 2002
401
0
16
chicago,Il.
Jan 28, 2004
#11
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #11
Well now its between These heads and AFR 165cc. What heads do you guys think are better? I will run them on a rebuilt 92 H.O 5.0. With a rpm air gap intake, a 625cfm Road Demon and a E-303 cam. What head will give me a better everyday driver during the summer but the most power street but sometimes strip just for fun. What will i have to get to make these or the AFR heads work? Such as push rods..Valves..
Rockers...and so on. Im new to heads and to building engines. Im learning as i go. So any help would be great
Pat
 

Joeverb

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2000
440
0
0
Jan 28, 2004
#12
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #12
myfirstii said:
Well now its between These heads and AFR 165cc. What heads do you guys think are better? I will run them on a rebuilt 92 H.O 5.0. With a rpm air gap intake, a 625cfm Road Demon and a E-303 cam. What head will give me a better everyday driver during the summer but the most power street but sometimes strip just for fun. What will i have to get to make these or the AFR heads work? Such as push rods..Valves..
Rockers...and so on. Im new to heads and to building engines. Im learning as i go. So any help would be great
Pat
Click to expand...

I like the Kasse design but for what your doing the AFRs would perform great and cost less i believe. What are the complete AFRs going for? What is the .050 duration on the 303 cam?

Now if you just got 2k sitting around your dieing to spend, i'd definitly run the Kaases. But for your app i think you would see similar performance numbers for both.
 
T

THE COBRAMAN

pig 'rassler
Founding Member
Mar 11, 1999
1,974
0
36
Oklahoma
Jan 28, 2004
#13
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #13
Partial to the 185s myself, but if you're not going to want more later (and you know you are), the 165s are probably fine.

Read one article where they used forged flattops, AFR185s, Victor Jr, holley 750, and a Comp 282 roller and made 453HP on the dyno. That'll put better than 350 to the wheels, and not many IIs will be able to use it without the smokefest to end all smokefests. I would imagine that the Kaase heads would make 500+ with a similar setup, but again, who can use it all?
 
M

myfirstii

Founding Member
Feb 28, 2002
401
0
16
chicago,Il.
Jan 29, 2004
#14
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #14
The specs for the E-303 are:Ford Motorsports E-303 - (for use with 1.6:1 rockers)

.498/.498 282/282 220/220@.050 LSA 110 LCA 107/117
Cobraman:I read a article in carcraft awhile back and they did a build up on a 90 H.O 5.o with a stock cam and put the AFR 165's,1:7 roller roclers,Rpm air gap, and a road Demon 625 carb on it. And they got about 420 hp put of it. Will i see these #'s with the 185's or will i have to make some mods to the motor?? I Dont have the money to buy anything else and im going to be going to college next year so i wont have any money for a while. So all i can do is heads. If i can get the 185's and get the same #'s as the 165's but be able the get more out if it if i do have the money later on that would be great. But im afraid that its to big of a head. Any help would be great
 

Joeverb

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2000
440
0
0
Jan 29, 2004
#15
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #15
If i recall correctly the only difference between the 165 and the 185 is the intake valve size isnt it? Whats the price difference?
 

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
Jan 29, 2004
#16
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #16
My guess is that the 165's would make more torque at street rpms at the cost of some hp at higher rpms. The 185's would be better on the track where you expect to spin the motor for all its worth.

You have to determine as best you can what the use of the car will be and select parts accordingly. If you have to drive it everyday I'd chicken-out and go with smaller ports. If you are just going to drive it on the weekend and at the track, I'd go larger.

Let us know what you decide.

78CobraII
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Dart SB-Ford Pro 1 Aluminum Cylinder Heads
  • 5.0TailPipeHump
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 29, 2008
5.0TailPipeHump
Lock Right Automatic Positive Locking Differential
  • zincyellow03
  • Aug 1, 2005
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 2, 2005
xseler8
Force Pro-Series Mufflers?
  • deadlast
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
789
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 19, 2006
dastang2
anyone hear or know about these Torque Plus intake gaskets?
  • nmcgrawj
  • May 31, 2005
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 1, 2005
Joes95GT
Speaking of heads...
  • Max Power
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
579
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 23, 2004
Max Power
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?