• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

leaf spring question

  • Thread starter Thread starter 351w fastback
  • Start date Start date Oct 7, 2004
3

351w fastback

New Member
Jul 25, 2004
91
0
0
Oct 7, 2004
#1
  • Oct 7, 2004
  • #1
my leaf springs on my 67 are worn out and i would like to replace them but i dont know which ones i should get? im mostly concerned about the height of the car more than their performance. i dont want the rear to sit to high but also dont want it to low. does anybody have any pictures of their cars and could u tell me what kind of springs u are using?
thanks
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 7, 2004
#2
  • Oct 7, 2004
  • #2
I am very interested in this as well I am going to be installing the GW UCA and I wont to have the car level so would that be standard, mid eye or reverse?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Oct 7, 2004
#3
  • Oct 7, 2004
  • #3
go with the mid eyes first. Let them settle after a few thousand miles. If your car still sits high, buy a set of lowering blocks for about $30. You can cut them as tall or short as you like until you get the height you want. ONce you cut though, you cant put material back
 
0

03SHKR

Member
Jul 20, 2004
231
0
16
Portland, OR
Oct 9, 2004
#4
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #4
A couple years ago. I replaced the rear leafs in my 67 fastback. I bought the high lift springs from Canadian Mustang. They were suppose to raise the car an extra 1" in the rear. In reality, the back may be up about 1/2" inch; and maybe not that much.

All in all, I happy with them. If you want to see some pics of the car, I have a link in my sig line. It's the read 67.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Oct 11, 2004
#5
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #5
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=506466

Check out this thread, and try a search on the forum. In my opinion, you should just rebuild your current spring pack to get the height you want. I haven't tried it yet, but I'm always looking for ways to save money.

Also, if you do it this way, you'll get just the height you want.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Oct 13, 2004
#6
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #6
Consider going with the reverse eye. This is what I have on my '65. A good ride heigth and they help the car to handle better because of the geometry. i.e. spring leaf goes over the top of the mounting point rather than the center or bottom.

Give Mustangs Plus a call on your model for the correct spring.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com/tech.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Front Coil Overs and Rear Traditional Springs within a Maximum Motorsports K-Member Kit
  • Habu135
  • Sep 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
847
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2026
Habu135
Suspension Is somethig Wrong Here?
  • Icemanxxxv
  • Jul 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
197
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Blow through intercooled questions
  • AngryH58
  • Aug 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
248
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 1, 2026
AngryH58
A
A
Resolved 302 oil leak when running
  • AlexM556
  • Sep 8, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Yesterday at 3:55 AM
manicmechanic007
K
Door post and rust repair
  • Kleinjj27
  • Aug 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
415
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Tuesday at 7:26 PM
Kleinjj27
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?