• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Legislation to Repeal Old Car Emissions Exemption Reintroduced

  • Thread starter Thread starter foghorn67
  • Start date Start date Feb 24, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Feb 27, 2004
#21
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #21
foghorn67 said:
but we all know, you have a fricking 6 cylinder, with it's only claim to fame is the pretty battery cables.
So why are you worried?

btw-there was no emissions equipment on my car in the first place. it's not a california car.
Click to expand...

Ya, but the battery cables don't have a CARB/EO number !!!
 

bud4660

Founding Member
Apr 14, 2002
459
0
0
Mesquite, Tx
Feb 27, 2004
#22
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #22
65fastback2+2 said:
emissions is how clean it runs right??? how much pollutants are being put into the air, and if they pass, move to good ole texas haha
Click to expand...

Wrong answer!!!! These idiots here follow what california does. We finely got the speed limit back up to 65 and bam. Save fuel they lowered the speed limit again.... Makes me want to go kick somebodys butt....GRRRRRR.
 
3

351pacecar

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2001
644
0
0
Hudson, Wisconsin
Mar 1, 2004
#23
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #23
Well when Jesse took over in MN the first thing he did was axe the emissions testing, now you can get tabs and take drag cars down the street so long as you don't have anything obviously illegal and have at least race mufflers.

I can't imaging more emissions crap getting any farther than the commitee with Mr. Humvee himself running your state.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Mar 4, 2004
#24
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #24
I'm thinking that they are going to start emissions testing in my county soon. I'm kind of worried. I thought my 73 stang was exempt in TX but they must have changed the law. You guys in CA should jump on their nuts someone in our state governments thinks we shouldn't be allowed to drive our old stangs. Stop them before they really get crazy.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Mar 4, 2004
#25
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #25
good ol GA:

No state inspection
No emissions testing (unless you live around ATL) - if your car is more than 10 or 15 years old it doesnt require it
70mph speed limits
 

alcino

Founding Member
Nov 2, 1999
195
5
19
san diego, ca
Mar 26, 2004
#26
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #26
I did my part. Emailed every Senator in Cali. I own a 76 cobra ii and these would freeze me out of the exemtion by one year

Alcino Azevedo
 

alcino

Founding Member
Nov 2, 1999
195
5
19
san diego, ca
Apr 15, 2004
#27
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #27
just passed through the Assembly of transportation. Now I'm really worried. I think one more hearing and then it's up to the govenator. I'm thinking he will sign it to keep the tree huggers at bay.

this depresses me so

Alcino
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Apr 15, 2004
#28
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #28
Oh man, I'm feeling for you guys. It's kinda like whats happening with guns here in Oz. I sure as hell hope they don't try and make older cars here have to be emissions compliant (although mine might make it anyways, that's the plan ). Although, they sorta do make all cars compliant to emissions regs, but there were no regs for cars prior to 1971 (here at least).
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Apr 15, 2004
#29
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #29
I have two ideas to solve the problem though, one involves these delightful individual runner intakes I have found (like Webers, but injection) with two injectors per port. Use TWO injection computers like Accel DFI to run the 16 injectors, which has an RPM switch, to turn on the second set of injectors, complete their circuits so the second injection computer can provide fuel to the motor as well. I think this system would give GREAT fuel economy and awesome power through its efficient design. Becuase you have twice as many injectors, you run really small ones, that atomise the fuel really well, leading to extreme efficiency.

The second idea is that all us classic Mustang lovers start our own country, we'll have to of course fight for some land to put said country on, but in the end it may be easier than putting together the injection system I mentioned above. lol.

Actually I think the injection system would be easy, just splice all the inputs together, etc.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 15, 2004
#30
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #30
this is a different law than the one that we beat down last spring right? the one that would have made my car (a 66) testable? will this law go after testing of cars that were never tested originally (such as muscle cars)?
 

2nd Mustang

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
2,488
0
46
Southern California
Apr 15, 2004
#31
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #31
Concerning Route666's reply, a friend of mine has a supercharger on a 4 cylinder Porsche with a larger fuel injected throttle body that feeds through a cat converter and STILL PASSES THE SMOG TEST. It looks so good, it can pass as a factory installation. (Of course it also helps that the people running the test station hardly ever see a Porsche come through there )
 

Zooted_plus

New Member
Jan 14, 2003
152
0
0
Dublin, CA
Apr 15, 2004
#32
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #32
I think what was previously said was correct, the law applies to '66 and later. If I did have to test my '65 though, having a smog license I'd have to overlook any portions of the test that didn't meet 'state' approval.

Why smogging your own car is legal, I don't know.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Apr 15, 2004
#33
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #33
does it stop the rollback, or does it require all cars to be smogged again? It seems to me sema or someone should write up a proposition and let the state vote on it. Once this happens the legislature will not be able to do anything about it and will have to find other ways of lowered the pollution in this state.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 15, 2004
#34
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #34
I wonder when the CA Legislature is going to get a clue. They are already driving businesses out of the state to the point that someday the state is simply going to implode and they continue to show their lack of cognitive resources with this type of smog legislation. I feel really sorry for you guys in CA and I am damn glad I don't live there anymore.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Apr 16, 2004
#35
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #35
The Most overlooked part of the push on the Smog Bill is
the fact that the manufacture's placed smog equipment on all vec's
from 1974 to be 49 states cert.
But not all models prev were Ca certified, But are in the state now,
Thats where the loophole is.
Their pushing for 1974 and newer to be smog tested.
So making a Change major or minor can Fail a emission test.
And stop the Rolling years Excemption.

Most not all , [You still see that one old heap with the tailpipe coathangered up.]
Have eather referbished like new or modded the classic's we own.
Show me the Numbers, How many new cars that have poor emissions, And are on the road. Compared to the amount of miles driven by Classic's. Which is more.

PB
 
O

Ozsum67

Too much thin air
Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
5,152
0
0
Eastern Colorado
Apr 16, 2004
#36
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #36
You know, after I got my 65 in a 70 mph ticket, I came to realize that Cali is THE most Fubar'd state we have, and if some day it slides off into the sea, well, we still have 49 more. We could let Puerto Rico in and wouldn't even have to change the flag. I don't want anyone to die. That is not my purpose here. Just calmly, and as quietly as you can, (and take the back roads) leave the damn state and take a big crap right on the border as you exit.
 
H

hindle

New Member
Jan 9, 2004
28
0
0
Flemington, NJ
Apr 16, 2004
#37
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #37
Route666 said:
I have two ideas to solve the problem though, one involves these delightful individual runner intakes I have found (like Webers, but injection) with two injectors per port. Use TWO injection computers like Accel DFI to run the 16 injectors,
Click to expand...


There is no need to do this at all. If you're running a standalone computer, it will have no problems running a large injector for a very short pulsewidth time. As long as it's tuned properly, it should pass emissions with flying colors.

-John
 
B

Blue67

Member
Jul 29, 2002
31
0
7
Long Beach, Ca
Apr 16, 2004
#38
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #38
You know if they pass this it another step forward into trying to get our carrs off the road. Even though we don't have to pass smog, they will try to do something to our cars. I already emailed her and I already let her know how I feel.

BTW You know she drives a SUV.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Apr 16, 2004
#39
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #39
hindle said:
There is no need to do this at all. If you're running a standalone computer, it will have no problems running a large injector for a very short pulsewidth time. As long as it's tuned properly, it should pass emissions with flying colors.

-John
Click to expand...

Yeh I know, but it'd be even better with the smaller injectors, you'd probably have a cleaner car than most new ones
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CA - Exempt pre-1981 Vehicles From Emissions Inspection Requirement
  • 85MustGT
  • Mar 29, 2012
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Apr 7, 2012
65ShelbyClone
  • Locked
Expired 50th Anniversary Ford Mustang Gt 5.0 - Car Raffle
  • RMHC of Tulsa
  • Jun 26, 2014
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
0
Views
1K
Other Classifieds Jun 26, 2014
RMHC of Tulsa
50th Anniversary Ford Mustang Gt 5.0 - Car Raffle
  • RMHC of Tulsa
  • Jun 26, 2014
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
2K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Jun 26, 2014
RMHC of Tulsa
Cash for Clunkers
  • Vegas Stang
  • Dec 31, 2008
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 7, 2009
78CobraII
T
Here we go again!
  • TOM B
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
999
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 15, 2009
TOM B
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?