• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Messing With Fuel Pressure

  • Thread starter Thread starter imp
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2017

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Aug 20, 2017
#1
  • Aug 20, 2017
  • #1
'94 GT 5.0L HO. Got a BBK adjustable fuel pressure regulator recently, today put it on. They had it set at 34 psi. Adjustment screw is pretty sensitive. Eng. still cold, < 160 degrees, I found very little difference in idle speed or quality when increasing slowly to 40+ psi, a bit of roughness to the idle while lowering back down, all the way to 20 psi. After a few seconds, at 20, idle smoothed out, speed normal ~ 700 rpm.

Let it get up to thermostat full open, HOT, closed-loop, same checks, same results! Knowing Charles Probst is pretty smart on these engines, he states PCM uses basically a "look-up" table" to determine injector pulse time, and therefore fuel/air ratio, not affected by O2s in open loop. So, what's up with these results? Why no significant change in idle speed/quality, over wide fuel pressure range? imp
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,448
1,532
194
Maryland
Aug 20, 2017
#2
  • Aug 20, 2017
  • #2
Are you checking the fuel pressure with the vacuum line disconnected? Because thats how it supposed to be done. Set it to 39 with vacuum hose disconnected. If you're fiddling with the vacuum line connected, multiple things are changing which might confuse what you're trying to recognize.

In my opinion, unless you have a good wideband O2 sensor and gauge, to monitor AF ratio, your not able to tell much of anything by listing to idle characteristics.

I'm curious why you want to set the pressure to anything other than factory spec. Don't get me wrong now, I know sometimes there are good reasons to set fuel pressure to other than factory. I'm wondering though, what is your reason?

Again, without a wideband to see actual AF ratios, you've got no clue the effects you causing.
 
Reactions: imp

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Aug 21, 2017
#3
  • Aug 21, 2017
  • #3
John Dirks Jr said:
Are you checking the fuel pressure with the vacuum line disconnected? Because thats how it supposed to be done. Set it to 39 with vacuum hose disconnected. If you're fiddling with the vacuum line connected, multiple things are changing which might confuse what you're trying to recognize.

In my opinion, unless you have a good wideband O2 sensor and gauge, to monitor AF ratio, your not able to tell much of anything by listing to idle characteristics.

I'm curious why you want to set the pressure to anything other than factory spec. Don't get me wrong now, I know sometimes there are good reasons to set fuel pressure to other than factory. I'm wondering though, what is your reason?

Again, without a wideband to see actual AF ratios, you've got no clue the effects you causing.
Click to expand...
@John Dirks Jr
Very good point! I connected the vacuum line before changing pressure. I have no idea what-all was done to this car before I got it in May, but soon found that, despite it's running exactly as our '93 Cobra had, smooth, powerful, all-around acceptable, it was (is) using way too much fuel. I have no tool beyond my ears & eyes with which to observe effect.

I appreciate your wisdom. Tomorrow, I will look into disconnecting the vacuum hose. Initially, I imagined that the regulator is designed to provide a certain pressure WITH vacuum present.

My reason? To experiment with lowered fuel pressure to observe operational effect, as well as fuel consumption. I drove it about at pressure = 20 psi, with absolutely no "feelable" difference. Idle great. Power, great. Smoothness and good tip-in/tip-out, very good. Operating temp., ~ 180`. imp
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Aug 21, 2017
#4
  • Aug 21, 2017
  • #4
Some more on the subject of fuel pressure...

How the fuel pressure regulator works

Revised 5-Jan-2014 to add how to set fuel pressure,

Step 1.) Check fuel pressure:
The local auto parts store may rent or loan a fuel pressure test gauge if you don't have one.
Disconnect the vacuum line from the fuel pressure regulator. Check it for evidence of fuel present in the line by removing it and blowing air through it. If you find fuel, the fuel pressure regulator has failed. Reinstall the line; leave the fuel pressure regulator end of the vacuum line disconnected. Then cap or plug the open end of the vacuum line and us-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/stow it out of the way.
Connect the fuel pressure test gauge to the Schrader port located just behind the alternator.
Turn the ignition switch on & start the engine. Observe the pressure: you should see 37-41 PSI at idle.
Turn the ignition off; reconnect the vacuum line to the fuel pressure regulator. Then disconnect the fuel pressure test gauge. Watch out for squirting gas when you do this.

Step 2 .) How the fuel pressure regulator works
The fuel pressure regulator in 5.0 pushrod Mustangs is a shunt regulator that works in parallel with the fuel injection system. The regulator bypasses fuel back to the tank to maintain a constant 39 PSI to the injector tips. A constant pressure insures that the computer will always have the same flow rate to base its calculations on.

The 39 PSI pressure is measured at 29.92 inches of atmospheric pressure to get the proper flow rate. But the pressure inside the intake manifold may be higher or lower than the atmospheric pressure outside the intake manifold. These differences would cause the flow rate to change and mess up the computer’s air/fuel calculations.

As the vacuum inside the intake manifold increases, the effective pressure at the injector tips increases. Conversely, as vacuum inside the manifold decreases, the effective pressure at the injector tip decreases.

Some math to illustrate the effect:
39 PSI at 20” of vacuum inside the manifold works out to be 49 PSI,
since the 20 “ vacuum/2 = 10 PSI that you add to the base fuel pressure.
That gives you 49 PSI at the injector tip.

39 PSI at 5” of vacuum inside the manifold works out to be 41.5 PSI,
Since 5” vacuum/2 = 2.5 PSI that you add to the base fuel pressure
That gives you 41.5 PSI at the injector tip

39 PSI with 10 lbs of boost inside the manifold works out to be 29 PSI.
That gives you 29 PSI at the injector tip

That reduces the flow rate and explains the need for higher pressures on engines with pressurized induction.

Since intake manifold vacuum and pressure plays havoc with the pressure at the injector tips, what has to be done to get it back in the magic 39 PSI range? That’s where vacuum applied to the back side of the fuel pressure regulator comes in. Remember this: unless you have some really poorly designed or trick plumbing, vacuum is the same throughout the engine’s vacuum system.

Apply 20” of vacuum to the back of the regulator and the 49 PSI pump pressure with 20” of vacuum at the injector tips drops to 39 PSI.

Apply 5” of vacuum to the back of the regulator and the 41.5 PSI pump pressure with 5” of vacuum at the injector tips drops to 39 PSI.

Here’s another side effect: apply 10 PSI boost pressure to the back of the regulator and the normal 39 PSI at the injector tips increases to 49 PSI. That overcomes the 10 PSI in the intake manifold to give you 39 PSI at the injector tips. Pretty clever of these engineers to use intake manifold vacuum and pressure that way.

Simply stated, as intake manifold vacuum increases, it adds to the effective fuel pressure at the injector tips. Apply the same vacuum to the back side of the fuel pressure regulator, and everything balances out. Add pressure to the intake manifold and the effective fuel pressure at the injector tip decreases. Apply the same pressure to the back side of the fuel pressure regulator, and everything balances out.

Now you know why to disconnect the vacuum when making fuel pressure measurements.

Cobra42898 said:
I like the FPR explanation, but one thing needs correction. Under vacuum, the fuel pressure output will be lower than 39 psi, and in boost it will be higher than 39 psi. A car under 10psi boost with 29 psi fuel pressure = kaboom. The term is delta fuel pressure, and it means the difference between manifold pressure and fuel pressure. It doesn't matter what the pressures are, as long as the delta is correct. This is why we change fuel filters, because it might flow fine at idle/low rpms, but at WOT/high rpms the clogged line can't flow enough to keep the delta pressure up and leans out the mixture. This is also why it's bad to have a FPR without a vacuum line attached (unless you're testing the fuel system). Tom
Click to expand...

Go back and reread the Tech note. It seems that you saw the 29 PSI and the word boost in the same paragraph and quit reading. This is a lot more that you either didn’t read or understand. "The regulator bypasses fuel back to the tank to maintain a constant 39 PSI to the injector tips.... The 39 PSI pressure is measured at 29.92 inches {or 14.7 PSI} of atmospheric pressure to get the proper flow rate. "

The key thing to keep in mind is the term effective pressure

As the pressure inside the intake manifold changes so does the effective fuel pressure at the injector tips. Less than 14.7 PSI in the intake manifold increases the effective fuel pressure. Greater than 14.7 PSI the intake manifold decreases the effective fuel pressure. Now that we know that vacuum or pressure changes the effective pressure at the injector tips, let's proceed onward.

I'm going to introduce a new term PISD. That stands for Pounds per Square Inch Differential. The proper definition is:

"The difference in pressure between two points in a fluid-flow system, measured in pounds per square inch. Abbreviated PSID or psid" (McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.).

The term PSID perfectly describes the situation we have here. In order to preserve the injector flow characteristics, we need to maintain the 39 PSID at the injector tips. That is done by applying pressure or vacuum to the back of the fuel pressure regulator. Pressure applied to the fuel pressure regulator increases the fuel pressure. Vacuum applied to the fuel pressure regulator decreases the fuel pressure. Keep that in mind along with the idea of effective pressure or PSID and you will have a better understanding.

When you connect a pressure gauge to the fuel pressure regulator, you are seeing PSIG. That letter "G" needs some explanation, so I will borrow a very good explanation from https://www.quora.com/Air-Pressure/What-is-the-difference-between-the-units-psi-and-psig
Kim Aaron, Spacecraft Mechanical Engineer writes
When you stick a pressure gage on the valve stem of a tire on a car or a bicycle, the needle is reading the pressure difference between the air inside the tire and the air outside the tire. That's called gage pressure. The units of psig (pounds per square inch, gage) remind us that we are talking about this *difference* in pressure. The absolute air pressure at sea level is about 14.7 psi. Suppose the air pressure in your car tire is 30 psig. Then the absolute pressure inside is 30+14.7 = 44.7 psi. Sometimes, we write that as 44.7 psia (pounds per square inch, absolute) to remind us we are talking about an absolute pressure. In either case, we could just use psi. It just helps avoid confusion to use the psig or psia as appropriate to be clear which we are talking about.
 
Reactions: General karthief

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Aug 21, 2017
#5
  • Aug 21, 2017
  • #5
you won't improve fuel economy by decreasing fuel pressure.
When the pressure changes, the ecu sees the change in AFR in the exhaust, and adjusts the injector pulsewidths to get back where the AFR should be according to the tables. This is basic closed loop operation. The ecu can adjust up to +/- 12.5%, IIRC.
Set it back to the factory spec, and leave it alone.
 
Reactions: imp

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Aug 21, 2017
#6
  • Aug 21, 2017
  • #6
vristang said:
you won't improve fuel economy by decreasing fuel pressure.
When the pressure changes, the ecu sees the change in AFR in the exhaust, and adjusts the injector pulsewidths to get back where the AFR should be according to the tables. This is basic closed loop operation. The ecu can adjust up to +/- 12.5%, IIRC.
Set it back to the factory spec, and leave it alone.
Click to expand...
@vristang

According to Charles O. Probst, a noted EFI authority, "Incorrect fuel pressure affects fuel/air mixture".

Closed loop gives O2 sensors, according to my understanding of what he states, only limited ability to "trim" constantly, the air/fuel ratio, based on varying injector open time. The key is "limited". If the ECU took away that trim and reverted strictly to "look-up" tables, closed loop would be lost. I suspect that does not happen. I could be wrong.

According to Probst, AFR is varied in closed loop no more than 0.1% from projected value. Say AFR is called for under given conditions of 13.0, a -12% change would be terrible, taking it down to 10.56. imp
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Aug 22, 2017
#7
  • Aug 22, 2017
  • #7
imp said:
@vristang

According to Charles O. Probst, a noted EFI authority, "Incorrect fuel pressure affects fuel/air mixture".

Closed loop gives O2 sensors, according to my understanding of what he states, only limited ability to "trim" constantly, the air/fuel ratio, based on varying injector open time. The key is "limited". If the ECU took away that trim and reverted strictly to "look-up" tables, closed loop would be lost. I suspect that does not happen. I could be wrong.

According to Probst, AFR is varied in closed loop no more than 0.1% from projected value. Say AFR is called for under given conditions of 13.0, a -12% change would be terrible, taking it down to 10.56. imp
Click to expand...
Probst was very accurate, especially considering the information that was commonly available when the books were written.

The ecu adjusts the AFR, based on feedback from the O2's. The ecu does not adjust the target AFR, it adjusts the output of the injectors by +/-12.5% (which is fairly well documented). This 12.5% value can be adjusted with most J3 tuner chips, but the factory setting is 12.5%.
Yes, targeting 10.5 AFR would be bad, but that isn't how it works.

The ecu looks at the O2 switching, takes a guess at what the AFR is, looks up what the AFR tables say it should be, apply any adders/multipliers for things like RPM and temperature, then looks at the error between the targeted and the actual AFR. The ecu also calculates how long the injector Pulsewidth should be for the target AFR. Then, applies a correction factor to this calculated Pulsewidth; the correction factor is proportional to the AFR error mentioned above.

Not sure what you mean by saying that AFR in closed loop varied no more than 0.1%. That doesn't ring any bells for me...
The Injector PW can vary by +/-12.5%.
 
Reactions: imp

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Aug 22, 2017
#8
  • Aug 22, 2017
  • #8
vristang said:
Probst was very accurate, especially considering the information that was commonly available when the books were written.

The ecu adjusts the AFR, based on feedback from the O2's. The ecu does not adjust the target AFR, it adjusts the output of the injectors by +/-12.5% (which is fairly well documented). This 12.5% value can be adjusted with most J3 tuner chips, but the factory setting is 12.5%.
Yes, targeting 10.5 AFR would be bad, but that isn't how it works.

The ecu looks at the O2 switching, takes a guess at what the AFR is, looks up what the AFR tables say it should be, apply any adders/multipliers for things like RPM and temperature, then looks at the error between the targeted and the actual AFR. The ecu also calculates how long the injector Pulsewidth should be for the target AFR. Then, applies a correction factor to this calculated Pulsewidth; the correction factor is proportional to the AFR error mentioned above.

Not sure what you mean by saying that AFR in closed loop varied no more than 0.1%. That doesn't ring any bells for me...
The Injector PW can vary by +/-12.5%.
Click to expand...
@vristang
Thanks for clarifying. I believe Probst meant that the O2 sensors in closed-loop cannot directly vary AFR more than 0.1%. imp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
263
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 9, 2026
JohnKay
J
C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
108
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
929
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
250
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
332
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?