• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Mid-teardown questions...

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Jun 29, 2008

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jun 29, 2008
#1
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #1
Finally got the heads off and am now staring at the pistons for the first time. I was wondering if anyone could tell me, by looking at them, whether these qualify as 'flat tops' and how much of a relief they have (for CR calculation purposes). I really have no clue... they were part of an Autozone rebuilt longblock... with 1970 heads and a 1972 block.

So yeah, I took a couple pictures, if anyone can ID them or take an educated guess at how big the reliefs are I'd apprecaite it.

PS: finding out your old heads were D0OE and therefore not worthless ... finding out your engine is bored .060 over and therefore soon to be done
 

Attachments

  • 100_1310.webp
    67.7 KB · Views: 395
  • 100_1308.webp
    45.5 KB · Views: 1,148
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 29, 2008
#2
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #2
Looks like your average dished 351W (1973-up) pistons. Comp ratio's going to be no more than 9.0 to 1. No valve reliefs there, meaning they didn't need em with a stock cam. The 69-72 pistons had valve reliefs. The 72 pistons had a little deeper dish than the 69-71's.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jun 29, 2008
#3
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #3
glad i had the heads milled then, hopefully that'll get it to the mid 9s, anyway.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jun 29, 2008
#4
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #4
If you look at the close up pic, you do see a minor relief in the piston... does that suggest its a 72 piston then (and maybe slightly better tahn the 73+ ones)?
 
N

NewStangOwnr

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
152
0
0
Jun 30, 2008
#5
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #5
You have plenty left with a .060 overbore.
I do haha
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 30, 2008
#6
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #6
SadbutTrue said:
If you look at the close up pic, you do see a minor relief in the piston... does that suggest its a 72 piston then (and maybe slightly better tahn the 73+ ones)?
Click to expand...

The 72's dish is round, with 4 eyebrow reliefs. I have one each 71 & 72 O.E. std bore 351W pistons I saved from parts motors. At some later point they went to that oval shaped dish in the 351W's.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 1, 2008
#7
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #7
what you have there is commonly referred to as the inverted dome piston, it's about the bottom of the barrell in performance terms, with a compression ratio generally of about 8.8:1, with milling the heads and the .060 overbore i'd say you're probably right around 9-9.2:1, you have to mill the heads an awful lot to bring that up much higher. what you need is a Speed Pro H-336-CP piston, it is a hypereutectic flat top made especially for the taller deck windsor and will get you right around 10.5:1 with those D0OE heads.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jul 1, 2008
#8
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #8
bnickel said:
what you have there is commonly referred to as the inverted dome piston, it's about the bottom of the barrell in performance terms, with a compression ratio generally of about 8.8:1, with milling the heads and the .060 overbore i'd say you're probably right around 9-9.2:1, you have to mill the heads an awful lot to bring that up much higher. what you need is a Speed Pro H-336-CP piston, it is a hypereutectic flat top made especially for the taller deck windsor and will get you right around 10.5:1 with those D0OE heads.
Click to expand...

Yeah, my newest calcs give say it'll bump the CR about .3, so if it starts at 8.8:1 then I'm at 9.1:1. New pistons weren't in the bag yet, but in a few years I'll get it rebuilt with nifty pistons and bring it to ~10.0-10.5. Hopefully the CR is at least high enough to take advantage of the cam and heads, still hoping for about 400 hp from this build.
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jul 1, 2008
#9
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #9
The 8.8 compression ratio is generally calculated with 64 cc heads. What size combustion chamber will you be running?

Weren't you going with trickflows?
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jul 1, 2008
#10
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #10
rhyno9 said:
The 8.8 compression ratio is generally calculated with 64 cc heads. What size combustion chamber will you be running?

Weren't you going with trickflows?
Click to expand...

Yeah, Trick Flows milled to 56cc chambers. If thats true it'd be nice, going off the top of my head would yield basically double the gains so I'd be closer to 9.5:1, which I could live with.

Can anyone confirm that? I always thought those stock ratio calculations still used 60cc heads..
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 1, 2008
#11
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #11
rhyno9 said:
The 8.8 compression ratio is generally calculated with 64 cc heads. What size combustion chamber will you be running?

Weren't you going with trickflows?
Click to expand...



wrong. those engines used 60cc heads. all 351's had 60cc chambers until the early 80's IIRC, in any case all 71-75 351w's used 60cc heads and the 8.8 compression was with those heads.
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jul 1, 2008
#12
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #12
bnickel said:
wrong. those engines used 60cc heads. all 351's had 60cc chambers until the early 80's IIRC, in any case all 71-75 351w's used 60cc heads and the 8.8 compression was with those heads.
Click to expand...

My statement wasn't meant to be a statement. It was meant to be a question. I just missed the ? at the end. When you see the piston in the catalog they show the compression ratio with 64 cc heads.

I know many of the late 70's heads had huge chambers. They were in the 70+ cc range from what I remember reading. I know the e7te heads are supposed to be 64 cc.

Do you know where I could find stock rebuild compression ratio info?

Basically I am struggling with similar issue. I have a reman f4te 351 with a stock rebuild. I want to put windsor jr 58cc heads but I am afraid of the detonation aspect because the bump in compression.

Thanks
RV
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 1, 2008
#13
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #13
rhyno9 said:
Basically I am struggling with similar issue. I have a reman f4te 351 with a stock rebuild. I want to put windsor jr 58cc heads but I am afraid of the detonation aspect because the bump in compression.

Thanks
RV
Click to expand...

Going from 64 cc to 58 ccs in a 351 will bump the ratio about a half point at best. No need to worry about pinging in your case. I run 93 octane gas in a 10.4 to 1 331 with Canfeild heads & a Z303 cam. It'll probably digest 89-90 with no more than a change in the timing. Now if you're planning on keeping the F4TE roller cam, then you may get into detonation problems. I run that cam in a carbed roller 5.0 with ported E7 heads and it'll ping in summertime with 87 gas and 12 degrees timing.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 1, 2008
#14
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #14
rhyno9 said:
My statement wasn't meant to be a statement. It was meant to be a question. I just missed the ? at the end. When you see the piston in the catalog they show the compression ratio with 64 cc heads.

I know many of the late 70's heads had huge chambers. They were in the 70+ cc range from what I remember reading. I know the e7te heads are supposed to be 64 cc.

Do you know where I could find stock rebuild compression ratio info?

Basically I am struggling with similar issue. I have a reman f4te 351 with a stock rebuild. I want to put windsor jr 58cc heads but I am afraid of the detonation aspect because the bump in compression.

Thanks
RV
Click to expand...



i'm not sure what the compression on later model windsors is, but i know of the did have a smaller dish to the pistons so with a 64cc chamber i can see it being around 8.8 still. pretty sure the 90's 351's had the smaller dish like Lightning motors for instance
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jul 1, 2008
#15
  • Jul 1, 2008
  • #15
SadbutTrue said:
Finally got the heads off and am now staring at the pistons for the first time. I was wondering if anyone could tell me, by looking at them, whether these qualify as 'flat tops' and how much of a relief they have (for CR calculation purposes). I really have no clue... they were part of an Autozone rebuilt longblock... with 1970 heads and a 1972 block.

So yeah, I took a couple pictures, if anyone can ID them or take an educated guess at how big the reliefs are I'd apprecaite it.

PS: finding out your old heads were D0OE and therefore not worthless ... finding out your engine is bored .060 over and therefore soon to be done
Click to expand...

Sorry to sidetrack your thread with my issues. I have basically the same dish without the reliefs and I have been trying to ascertain the same info.

After looking at the first pic I can see a portion of what would appear to be the part number under the dish. Clean the rest of that off and then maybe you can provide a part number which will assist in locating the specs for the piston.

Thanks to everyone and to the internet. Sharing of ideas and knowledge is a wonderful thing.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 2, 2008
#16
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #16
rhyno9 said:
Sorry to sidetrack your thread with my issues. I have basically the same dish without the reliefs and I have been trying to ascertain the same info.

After looking at the first pic I can see a portion of what would appear to be the part number under the dish. Clean the rest of that off and then maybe you can provide a part number which will assist in locating the specs for the piston.

Thanks to everyone and to the internet. Sharing of ideas and knowledge is a wonderful thing.
Click to expand...


guess i'm not seeing what you are but i suspect that what you are seeing is probably an 060 which is just an indicator that the piston is .060 oversized
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jul 2, 2008
#17
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #17
rhyno9 said:
Sorry to sidetrack your thread with my issues. I have basically the same dish without the reliefs and I have been trying to ascertain the same info.

After looking at the first pic I can see a portion of what would appear to be the part number under the dish. Clean the rest of that off and then maybe you can provide a part number which will assist in locating the specs for the piston.

Thanks to everyone and to the internet. Sharing of ideas and knowledge is a wonderful thing.
Click to expand...

Not an issue
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jul 3, 2008
#18
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #18
Okay, pushrods coming in today. So a few questions before we start-reassembly.

1) I have a degree kit from summit. After donig some research on compcams' site and others, it seems like its a decent idea but for my purposes perhaps not worthwhile. I keep reading that the purpose of degreeing is to 'compensate for machining errors etc'... how exactly does it do that? More importantly, should I bother?

2) Camshaft endplay... how is the best way to check that?

3) Anything else I absolutely need to make sure is perfect or need to not forget when I'm putting it all back together?

Thanks for all the help!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 4, 2008
#19
  • Jul 4, 2008
  • #19
I've never degreed a cam. Never had reason to think I needed too either. End play? Install the cam, then the retainer plate, then the timing set and then see if there's any movement forward or back in trying the move the cam gear. There shoudn't be much if any. If there is, you may have the wrong timing set.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jul 5, 2008
#20
  • Jul 5, 2008
  • #20
Okay next question... what do you Trick Flow (and perhaps other heads) guys do with the alternator mounting bolt on the one head? The threaded side inside the insert is way smaller than the alternator bolt from the stock heads. Do you use a smaller bolt and sleeves? Do you drill out a bigger hole in the aluminum? Do you fab up some sort of bracket to hold the alternator via other bolts?

I've already had an alternator bolt shear off and that was a full-sized one, I imagine the smaller one won't last long...

Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Digital Tuning Megasquirt Ms Ii/v3 Build.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Oct 12, 2013
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2013
hoopty5.0
The rematch (Or how I learned about nitrous....The hard way) only 1 left!
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 29, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2011
CarMichael Angelo
D
ouch!
  • dude496
  • May 27, 2007
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
867
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 27, 2007
MaxedGT
have any of you ever tried this?if so did it work?
  • 408gt91
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2007
408gt91
NPI to PI Cam/Manifold Swap HOW TO
  • Dusstbuster
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
25K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2013
TurdstangGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?