• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

misc ramblings at nmra about future powertrain...doh!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter billfisher
  • Start date Start date Oct 8, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Oct 8, 2006
#1
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #1
this is my first opportunity to post a discussion of 2008 or 2009 mustang gt powertrain directions...
i was talking to Al Papito and a few of his fellow "guys that know" concerning future directions of motors for this car.

the word is, that ford is considering using the lincoln LS 3.9l v8 as the standard GT motor. according to Al, it's a POS motor. fuel economy seems to be driving things. i wonder if the MOD motor is going the way of the dinosaur altogether? no word on that, but a small 4v v8 is not good news.


-bill
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Oct 8, 2006
#2
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #2
if ford goes smaller than the current 4.6 that so many already complain about, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. now if that motor was optional, and not in a GT, but something similar to an LX, then they may have something, depending on power output. i am not familiar with that motor at all.

all the rumors floating around out there about more displacement and added power, i cant believe they would go conservative on us.

doesnt the LS engine require premium fuel? i thought that was one of the reasons that tylers65 sold his LS.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Oct 8, 2006
#3
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #3
you are right.

i just wanted to throw it out. sma;; v8 for GT...
larger for specialty stangs. i certainly hope not.
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Oct 8, 2006
#4
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #4
That would never happen. The Lincoln motor costs more than the 3v, and it's taking a step backwards in power.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Oct 8, 2006
#5
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #5
I will burn my mustang in effigy if they introduce the 2009 GT with a 3.9L under the hood. every other company is putting "muscle" back into muscle car, all ford cares about is its stupid fuel economy ratings...
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 9, 2006
#6
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #6
but ford has few cars that are over 22mpg, and the EPA restrictions are taking their toll. It's either change the power plant in a well selling car or design a whole new car thats way effcient like 33mpg to higher their average. I can see Ford doing this....but common..even the V6 is bigger than that. I thought the 281 was small but a 3.9? Maybe the 3.9 will be standard GT then there will be many other modles to choose from like a Boss 302 and a mach 1 w/ a 3-4V 4.6 V8
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Oct 9, 2006
#7
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #7
I will most certainly be buying a Dodge in the future if Ford does that.

5.7/6.1>>>>3.9 blah!
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Oct 9, 2006
#8
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #8
i guess nobody really knows, but ford has never been above killing a powertrain if they feel it is obsolete. i have a love/hate relationship with 3v and i hope it continues. at some point they need a small V8 for mileage. maybe a tweaked 3.9l but a small one never the less. remember the 4.2l from 1980.

mismatched ports 115hp/245 lb-ft. 255 cu.in. of badd-ass power. they have done it before. it's about sales to 295 million not the few performance enthusiasts.

however... the camaro and challenger will kill them. personally, i wouldn't mind a 280ish hp v8 stang with 30mpg highway for a commuter. i drive 75 miles one way to work. with 20mpg i get now that's a good alternative. no need to mod it because a 3.9l is worthless.

it was the only place i have heard that said. everything else on the net points toward something to compete with 425hp 6.1l hemi and 425hp 6.0l LS-X.


ford is not above imploding.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Oct 9, 2006
#9
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #9
here is an old link to what we really want in a stang.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112_0308_ford_mustang_boss_350_v_10/
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Oct 9, 2006
#10
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #10
billfisher said:
here is an old link to what we really want in a stang.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112_0308_ford_mustang_boss_350_v_10/
Click to expand...

^ That's what I'm talkin about! V10 ftw. 3.9L ftl
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Oct 9, 2006
#11
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #11
Hmmm....scary thought. Maybe we will see the return of the 4-banger in a mustang! I can't imagine they would really go with that small 8. I'm sure Ford isn't as concerned about their mustangs as we are, but surely they see how valuable this car is to their line-up.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Oct 9, 2006
#12
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #12
And yet they are bringing the f450 to the average consumer buyer. Ughh...
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Oct 9, 2006
#13
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #13
san~man said:
I will most certainly be buying a Dodge in the future if Ford does that.

5.7/6.1>>>>3.9 blah!
Click to expand...

+1

But what about this? Says 350-400 hp 4.6 V8 and a 3.5 260-280 hp V6.



 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Oct 9, 2006
#14
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #14
all ford has to do is the aussie thing. a boss 290 federalized. same as GTO.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Oct 9, 2006
#15
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #15
i would all over most of the aussie FPV engines.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Oct 9, 2006
#16
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #16
i swear i heard the same rumors about 3-4 years ago about the 05+ mustang. Hope its not true but knowing ford lately, it probably is.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Oct 9, 2006
#17
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #17
bigcat said:
i would all over most of the aussie FPV engines.
Click to expand...

The FPV = SEX
 
F

fiveofanatic

How to fuel a Mustang:
Founding Member
Aug 12, 1998
8,152
0
76
Phoenix, AZ suburbs
Oct 9, 2006
#18
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #18
san~man said:
I will most certainly be buying a Dodge in the future if Ford does that.

5.7/6.1>>>>3.9 blah!
Click to expand...
Been there, done that.

I have no urge to buy a current Mustang, not even the Shelby. But if the Challenger look as good as the concept, I'll be in line.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Oct 9, 2006
#19
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #19
thats if Ford lasts until 2009
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Oct 10, 2006
#20
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #20
streetstang03 said:
thats if Ford lasts until 2009
Click to expand...

Just as surely as the government didn't let the major airline carriers go defunct, neither will they let one of the big 3 either.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

First 2015 Ford Mustang To Auction For Charity
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 21, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Dec 21, 2013
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?