• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

motor mounts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5.0guy
  • Start date Start date May 10, 2004
5

5.0guy

Member
Apr 17, 2004
320
0
17
MI
May 10, 2004
#1
  • May 10, 2004
  • #1
well, mine are on their way out, if not out already. what's a good brand?
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
May 10, 2004
#2
  • May 10, 2004
  • #2
If you just want rubber ones, you can't go wrong with Ford -- I've never tried the standard auto parts stores one, but they're probably not bad either. For Poly you can go with Energy Suspension or Prothane, both will be fine. For solids there are a bunch of different companies.
 

Starscream88

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
1,277
1
0
Park Ridge NJ
May 10, 2004
#3
  • May 10, 2004
  • #3
You get what you pay for,

Get the Poly ones,

Thats on my hit list when that engine starts to sway
 
S

stlboarder

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2002
215
0
17
Arizona
May 10, 2004
#4
  • May 10, 2004
  • #4
Energy Suspension or Prothane are both good ones. They sell both on Summit.com
 
5

5.0guy

Member
Apr 17, 2004
320
0
17
MI
May 10, 2004
#5
  • May 10, 2004
  • #5
alright, thanks!
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
May 10, 2004
#6
  • May 10, 2004
  • #6
I bought the Prothane ones from 50resto.com. These things are awesome!

Tim

 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
May 10, 2004
#7
  • May 10, 2004
  • #7
hpm solid mounts here, real satisfied with them.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 10, 2004
#8
  • May 10, 2004
  • #8
Alright...newbie type question here...what do the poly and solid motor mounts do compared to the stock ones...

Also I have heard of people putting vert motor mounts on their coupes...what is the reasoning behind this?...smoother?...
 
S

stlboarder

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2002
215
0
17
Arizona
May 10, 2004
#9
  • May 10, 2004
  • #9
Ok... stock mounts have rubber to dampin the vibartions. Prothane uses urethan as the bushings and it is stiffer and lasts a hell of a lot longer than rubber. Solid Motor Mounts are just that... they are solid metal. They have great response but the trade off is more vibrations.

I hope this helps.
 

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
May 10, 2004
#10
  • May 10, 2004
  • #10
Also the vert mounts are made differently than standard coupe or hatch mounts. The poly mounts use the design of the vert mounts. If you go to say advance auto parts web site or another of the major parts store's sites they should have pictures of the parts and you will see how different the vert mounts are from the others. I personally have the energy suspension mounts and they work great.
 
M

mi2fast

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
36
0
0
Hellcentro Ca
May 10, 2004
#11
  • May 10, 2004
  • #11
i bought the convertable mounts from Auto Zone they have a life time warranty and they were like 17 bucks each. So far have done a great job.
 

blkstangman88

New Member
Apr 6, 2004
646
0
0
May 10, 2004
#12
  • May 10, 2004
  • #12
quick question here, some one said u get what u pay for....i got mine for $45 each from napa, there urethan, just got them on last week, these any good
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 11, 2004
#13
  • May 11, 2004
  • #13
im with MI2fast. i have the same ones (vert mounts from AZ) and they are fine. as i recall, the vert mounts are interlocked, whereas older hardtop mounts can separate (that is what i read; i have never seen the latter).

Ford recognized that the vert mounts were better, so by 93 (maybe earlier), the vert mounts came on all stangs. if you go with AZ mounts, either ask for vert mounts, or ask for mounts for a 93 of any flavor.....same part number.

another benefit of urethane (if not mentioned): urethane resists oil and such more than rubber. but mine were about 1/3 the cost of urethane (two motor and one trans mount for under 50 bucks, IIRC), so i could not justify urethane.

good luck.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 11, 2004
#14
  • May 11, 2004
  • #14
HISSIN50 said:
im with MI2fast. i have the same ones (vert mounts from AZ) and they are fine. as i recall, the vert mounts are interlocked, whereas older hardtop mounts can separate (that is what i read; i have never seen the latter).
Click to expand...

Me too.................
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 11, 2004
#15
  • May 11, 2004
  • #15
So what exactly does the vert mounts have over the coupe mounts...

So people pay for these solid and poly, urethane mounts because they last longer...?...

Will vert mounts be smoother than the coupe?
 

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
May 11, 2004
#16
  • May 11, 2004
  • #16
I don't know if you would feel any difference between the regualr vert and regualr coupe mounts, but the poly mounts are definently a bit stiffer and you feel the engine more. Hissin50 is right about the standard coupe/hatch mounts being able to completely seperate. When I had to change my factory mounts on my hatch the passenger side came off in two pieces, and that is runninga stock engine . The vert mounts are interlocked so even if the rubber comes completely apart the metal will hold the engine in place. I went with the energy suspension mounts just beacuse I had the extra cash at the time to get them, and I figured I wouldn't ever have to worry about changing them again. I am sure I would have been fine with vert mounts.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 11, 2004
#17
  • May 11, 2004
  • #17
The Shape - right on.
i am of the same mind as TS - i would have gotten urethane, except that i drive like a granny, and did not have the cash to spend on the urethane. but the urethane is really nice - if you have the means, you cant go wrong with it. just a budget choice for some of us.
urethane will transmit more of the engine "feel" - the amount seems to depend on mods and how sensitive your rump is. the motor should flex less, and i would think that urethane would be the last set of mounts you need to replace.....
i can think of no reason not to use vert mounts in the very least....
good luck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Motor mounts question
  • djj62478
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
426
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
nickyb
J
Bad Vibration
  • jefffletch47
  • Feb 12, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
219
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
dgrinnan
D
Engine Radiator with no shroud provision... What to do?
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
262
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
FastDriver
Engine Contour fan CFM
  • Mustang5L5
  • Apr 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
364
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 22, 2026
qikgts
E
3.8l upgrade, motor mount options
  • Ed Russell
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
104
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
Ed Russell
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?