• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Need Some Help !

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rolen31
  • Start date Start date Jun 26, 2017
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#1
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #1
Hi all I have a 1995 mustang that i just put a 347 into . I had to switch to a 28oz flywheel and when i did this it also required me to switch to a 10 inch clutch from a 68-73 rather than the 10.5 stock clutch for 95. Now the problem im having is when I go to push the clutch it doesnt engage and there is almost no pressure . So Do i need to switch the throwout bearing ? If so what year ? I hope someone on here has the answer for me because im dying to test out the new 347 ! thanks .
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,824
10,506
203
polk county florida
Jun 26, 2017
#2
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #2
Welcome to stangnet, I will move this to the 94-5 tech threads, what trans are you using? They may need to know some more info like your shoe size or what beer you like.
 
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#3
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #3
the stock 95 trans .
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,878
21,055
234
Box behind Walmart
Jun 26, 2017
#4
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #4
I must be missing something here. Why would your imbalance change the diameter of your clutch? The trans and bellhousing are still the same.

What would the difference in clutch diameter have anything to do with the clutch release mechanism?


I would have anticipated problems other than those in your description.

@mikestang63 @Mustang5L5 @tannerc91gt @GroverDill @RangerJoe @90sickfox @Chuckman @95BlueStallion

That's all I can think of for meow.
 
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#5
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #5
Ok when i ordered the 28oz flywheel it was one that takes the 10 inch clutch my 10.5 would not mount to it so i got a spec sf952 which is the 10 inch stage 2 clutch . the throwout bearing that came with that clutch would not work for my trans so i put a new stock 95 throwout bearing in and when it was all done the clutch will not engage .
 
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#6
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #6
My engine builder threw it on me last minute about needing a 28oz flywheel and when i ordered it I didnt notice that it was for the 10 inch clutch thats why i swapped the clutch so it would mount to the flywheel but now i have no clutch . Unsure why
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,878
21,055
234
Box behind Walmart
Jun 26, 2017
#7
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #7
My motor is zero balanced (Fox). I use the same diameter clutch and flywheel that I used with the stock 50 oz imbalance.

I can't think of a single reason why that would be different for you.
 
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#8
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #8
I guess the problem was that i ordered a flywheel for an older model which was meant for a 10 inch clutch
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,824
10,506
203
polk county florida
Jun 26, 2017
#9
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #9
What block are you using?
What crank did your builder use?
Take a flashlight and look into the clutch arm opening and see if you got the tob on correct and the clutch arm on the pivot ball right.
 
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#10
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #10
its a factor 302 block with the 28 oz scat crank
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Jun 26, 2017
#11
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #11
Does the starter even engage the smaller flywheel??
 
R

Rolen31

New Member
Jun 26, 2017
7
0
1
Jun 26, 2017
#12
  • Jun 26, 2017
  • #12
yes the flywheel is still 157 tooth and same overall diameter . just where the clutch mounts its setup for the mounting holes on a 10 inch clutch l
 
B

Bad69cat

Member
Jun 20, 2017
11
1
13
Jul 6, 2017
#13
  • Jul 6, 2017
  • #13
I realize the post is a little stale by now - but the crank is what determines the balance of the engine. Since your using the older 28 oz style SCAT - you are correct in using the right bolt pattern and balanced flywheel. there were also a few variations in lengths of input shafts as I recall.... that may be a contributor. Get ahold of the guys at Modern Driveline and they can lead you to the variations that you need to get the conversion done....... they know it inside out and backwards. I have no doubt they will get you going......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
141
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
A
Need some info on putting a 2002 4.6l in a 1997 gt.
  • Austin4.6l
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
125
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2025
Austin4.6l
A
U
Knowledge Sought
  • USMCE3ROFP
  • Dec 6, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
180
Other Auto Tech Dec 6, 2025
USMCE3ROFP
U
R
Drivetrain Clutch
  • Robman8028
  • Jun 29, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
222
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 2, 2025
AeroCoupe
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
239
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?