• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

New Camaro may be short lived!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangford289
  • Start date Start date Mar 5, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

SinCityVogel

New Member
Aug 4, 2005
118
0
0
Las Vegas
Mar 9, 2009
#21
  • Mar 9, 2009
  • #21
I read about it in MotorTrend.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Mar 10, 2009
#22
  • Mar 10, 2009
  • #22
Lots of new Camaros..... - SVTPerformance





 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Mar 11, 2009
#23
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #23
The Camaro was scheduled for only a few MY's according to Bob Lutz.
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Mar 11, 2009
#24
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #24


The chrome trim around the rear lamps is just fugly.
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Mar 11, 2009
#25
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #25
gashog said:
GM is king of shared platforms.... you should really read up. All brands do this fyi.

List of GM platforms - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Cobalt/G5/ion, aura/G6/malibu , equinox/torrent/vue, your beloved f-bodies firebird/camaro... the list goes on friend.
Click to expand...

oh i know that. same thing with cougar/thunderbird/mark viii, cougar/mustang, fusion/milan taurus/sable. etc.

grand marquis/crown victoria/town car.
 

mustangford289

Founding Member
Sep 16, 2001
957
5
48
Florida
Mar 11, 2009
#26
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #26
It looks great, I bet GM will sell a ton of them .....
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Mar 11, 2009
#27
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #27
Actually it goes deeper than that:

CD3:
Mazda6, Fusion, Edge, Milan, MKZ, MKX, Mazda CX-9,

D3:
500, Montego, Taurus, Sable (now discontinued), MKS, MKT, Flex, soon: Explorer, Volvo XC90

I have nothing against shared platforms, but they should at least make a really good base platform and use that across the board. The Volvo designed D3 is a VERY bloated chassis, 4000+ lb curb weight, extreme understeer, etc... but the Mazda designed CD3 is exceptionally good. The Ford/Volvo/Mazda joint designed C1 is used in compact cars like the Mazda3, Mazda CX-7, Ford Kuga, Ford Transit, Volvo C30/C70/S40, Mazda5, and the non-USA Ford Focus from 2004-up.

The USA Ford Focus is STILL made on the 1998 C170 chassis - total rubbish. The Europeans are getting a 300 hp Ford Focus RS and we have a 11 year old Focus with fake fender vents and LED lights for the cupholders.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Mar 11, 2009
#28
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #28
mustangford289 said:
It looks great, I bet GM will sell a ton of them .....
Click to expand...

:vomit:

 

mustangford289

Founding Member
Sep 16, 2001
957
5
48
Florida
Mar 11, 2009
#29
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #29
LMAO

CatmanJJ said:
:vomit:

Click to expand...

lol ---I hope that isn't the interior of the production car....
 
S

stanmckinney

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,188
5
49
Mar 11, 2009
#30
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #30
It's ALIVE.
 

rugedraw

New Member
Oct 12, 2004
47
0
0
Miami, FL
Mar 11, 2009
#31
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #31
That interior is whack beyond description. IMO, of course. Although, I don't see anyone liking that atrocity unless you are on a permanent acid trip.
 

gashog

Member
Dec 26, 2006
139
0
16
Fresno, CA
Mar 11, 2009
#32
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #32
metroplex said:
The USA Ford Focus is STILL made on the 1998 C170 chassis - total rubbish. The Europeans are getting a 300 hp Ford Focus RS and we have a 11 year old Focus with fake fender vents and LED lights for the cupholders.
Click to expand...

The current focus chassis is alright, with a few tweaks it can have pretty heroic handling. Closest thing we've got to a real focus though is the volvo c30. I test drove one and it was awesome. Firm, light on its feet, and rock solid. The turbo 5 is very smooth too. It's a shame the north american market has leaned bigger is better for so long.



That camaro's interior...
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Mar 11, 2009
#33
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #33
gashog said:
The current focus chassis is alright, with a few tweaks it can have pretty heroic handling. Closest thing we've got to a real focus though is the volvo c30. I test drove one and it was awesome. Firm, light on its feet, and rock solid. The turbo 5 is very smooth too. It's a shame the north american market has leaned bigger is better for so long.
Click to expand...

The Mazdaspeed3 is also a C1 car and it has a 263 hp turbocharged I4. IMHO the MS3 is much better than the C30.

I would love to try out the new 300hp Focus RS though.
 

gashog

Member
Dec 26, 2006
139
0
16
Fresno, CA
Mar 13, 2009
#34
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #34
metroplex said:
The Mazdaspeed3 is also a C1 car and it has a 263 hp turbocharged I4. IMHO the MS3 is much better than the C30.

I would love to try out the new 300hp Focus RS though.
Click to expand...

I thought the speed3 shared the same underpinnings as the current 3? Too bad mazda around here wants too much for them. I'd much rather have that than the caliber srt4.
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Mar 13, 2009
#35
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #35
gashog said:
I thought the speed3 shared the same underpinnings as the current 3? Too bad mazda around here wants too much for them. I'd much rather have that than the caliber srt4.
Click to expand...

The local dealers wanted $23k + tax/title for the 2008 MS3 just a few weeks ago (in 2009).

The Mazda3 is a C1 car, just like the 2004-up International Focus / Volvo C30, etc... The Mazdaspeed3 is a Mazda3 wagon with some mods and extra reinforcements in the roof/chassis (hence no moonroof option).

Overall, the MS3 is a very swell car. The interior is almost on-par with Audi, but there were some thngs that made me look at the Cobalt SS instead.
 
9

'99 T/A

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2001
357
0
17
Houston, Texas
Mar 17, 2009
#36
  • Mar 17, 2009
  • #36
That interior ...

CatmanJJ said:
:vomit:

Click to expand...

Is one of the reasons I so desperately wanted to be able to sit in one at the car show !

Meaning that I am hoping it's better looking in real life than in pictures ...

But, since the SS & V6 on display were "sealed" - you could not sit in them - I still don't know.

On the other hand, the new Challenger is just flat out bad azz !

The only drawback is the large rear pillars ( blind spot ) and the fact that no 'vert will be offered ...

Who knows - the SS is long paid for, and for way less than the cost of a new one I could add on some HP's to what I got.

Of course, my Ford & GM stock could make me megabucks, too.

Time will tell.

Britt
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Something to read about the BIG 3
  • MysticWitch
  • Dec 5, 2008
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
870
Regional Forums and Event Information Dec 5, 2008
MysticWitch
M
G
Oldsmobile brought back to life by..........TOYOTA??????
  • GNN60GT500
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2008
bnickel
B
A short novel on the history of gasoline
  • 69gmachine
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 29, 2006
fasttback
Camshaft Information and Specifications
  • 5spd GT
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
40K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 20, 2007
5spd GT
Con victims out $10,000 or more
  • marvinmycat
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 6, 2003
aznzebra
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?