• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

oversize valves worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_woodster
  • Start date Start date Nov 27, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 27, 2003
#1
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #1
oversize valves worth it? (140,sting,svo1?)

I was peeping around ebay and came accross these...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33621&item=2445222279

aparently the guys sells larger valves and what not, is this a set worth looking into..or should i sell my first child into slavery and see what i can afford at esslinger?
 

Lx89Stang05

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
1,005
0
0
S.E. Mass
Nov 27, 2003
#2
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #2
thats a big help since these heads on the tubos dont flow good, a good port job with nice valves will work good.

__________________
89' Mustang Lx 2.3T 5spd,Smoke Metallic
Engine Mods:
2.3 Turbo Merkur Motor, Garrett T3 Turbo Set@10-25psi, .60 Trim Compressor .63 A/R Turbine, Fully Ported And Polished Head, 35 lb/hr Injectors, Gutted Upper Intake, Ported and Knifed Lower Intake, K&N Filter, Cold Air Intake, Stock Forged Pistons, Adjustable Boost Valve, LA3 ECM, Big VAM, A/C Delete, Removed Air Box and Silencer,Bailey Evo BOV.
Exhuast Mods:
2.5" Dual 2 Chamber Flowmasters 40's, Ported E6 Exhaust Manifold, SVO Y-Pipe, 2.5" Down Pipe No Cats, 2.5 SS Tail Pipes

Suspension/Body/Interior Mods:
94' Cobra springs, Rear GT Sway Bar, 88' Ranger Air Dam, 15" Hand Polished American Racing Rims, GT Spoiler, GT Escort seats, Boost Guage
In The Works:
Supercoupe Intercooler,5spd Trans., 8.8' Rear End, 3.90 grears
Future Mods:
Rods Header, 17" Cobra R Rims, pro5.0 Short Throw Sifter. SVO Brakes, Brake Ducts, Walbro 255lph Fuel Pump, Kirban Adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator, Cam, Adjustable Cam Pulley.
 

muh'stang

If I were rich, I'd make sure all the scoops on my
Sep 26, 2003
277
0
0
Quesnel, B.C., Canada
Nov 27, 2003
#3
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #3
the idea came to me the idea day while on a ricer board, I said to them: "reduce the base circle of the came lobe significantly and replace youre valves with oversized ones that are the right length longer then the stock ones so they roll on the modified cam properly"
In theory, it sounds like it would work.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 27, 2003
#4
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #4
anyone know what the stock valve sizes are? Also the flow numbers of a head/valve stock , verse ported with bigger valves? one more thing, if i want to use an aftermarket grind for my cam, would i need to use the old solid followers, or can i get a roller cam for a 2.3 custom grinded?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Nov 27, 2003
#5
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #5
oversized valves are great, but not unless you have the matching work. You need to unshroud the valves, or you only shroud them more by installing larger valves. in short, unless your head is ported and unshrouded, it won't be worth the effort or cost.
 

Lx89Stang05

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
1,005
0
0
S.E. Mass
Nov 27, 2003
#6
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #6
turbo heads have
Intake valves 1.73
Exhaust valves 1.49
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 27, 2003
#7
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #7
thanks guys for the info, thats great stuff! Should i get the machined (valve seats done, etc) before i further* unshroud, so so i knew what im looking at as far as the max radius of the port? Also , looking at this kit, comes with dual springs and stuff, would u guys (anyone who has delt with this issue) recommend this setup? i have heard of better spring rate springs, but not a dual setup like featured. the benifits seem obvious, better reliablitly at high rpm, using duo-springs to prevent valve float. I could be way off, but it seems like a good idea, what are your thoughts?
 

GTPhreak

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
5,505
0
77
Rowlett, TEXAS
Nov 27, 2003
#8
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #8
Here are some pics of a ported big valve head.
http://gtphreak.virtualave.net/pics/head/head.php
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 27, 2003
#9
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #9
GTPhreak said:
Here are some pics of a ported big valve head.
http://gtphreak.virtualave.net/pics/head/head.php
Click to expand...

its that your site/head gtphreak? if so , what is your take on the bigger valves as far as performance.
 

GTPhreak

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
5,505
0
77
Rowlett, TEXAS
Nov 27, 2003
#10
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #10
yeah its my site, but that is ispy malik's head. he posts on here sometimes, but the motor isn't built/installed yet
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 28, 2003
#11
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #11
mr_woodster said:
thanks guys for the info, thats great stuff! Should i get the machined (valve seats done, etc) before i further* unshroud, so so i knew what im looking at as far as the max radius of the port? Also , looking at this kit, comes with dual springs and stuff, would u guys (anyone who has delt with this issue) recommend this setup? i have heard of better spring rate springs, but not a dual setup like featured. the benifits seem obvious, better reliablitly at high rpm, using duo-springs to prevent valve float. I could be way off, but it seems like a good idea, what are your thoughts?
Click to expand...

anyone? stinger .... 140 , svo1? has anyone done this here besides me ( me wanting too that is)...just looking for some knowledge able feed back ( i have reicieved plenty about matching un shrouding and such thanks guys!) ...so the more the merrier
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Dec 1, 2003
#12
  • Dec 1, 2003
  • #12
you want input from someone stupid?

Sure.

I only have one buddy w/ the oversized valves whose head I've worked on. I'd go that route if you did all that bhuff said. This head I mentioned is awesome, should be installed anytime now and he'll hopefull dyno so we can see improvements. Many argue that it's not really worth it since the stock valves handle all the limited head is capable of anyway.

I'd do my porting first though, so that if you accidentally touch the valve seat, they will address that anyway when they do the valve job and remove your flaw. If I was doing it after they did the valve job I'd be a little more nervous. And actually, I've done it both way's.

When they do the 3 angle or 5 angle for the big valve install, rest assured it will blend in nicely w/ the work you'd do unshrouding the valve and opening up the short side and you shouldn't have to go in again and clean anything up.

The valve springs doubled like you mentioned is nice, but only if you are gonna go beyond the stock computer rev limit w/ something tunable. Stock springs are fine and won't float well beyond the 6.25k redline. For minimal parasitic drag, if you are staying with the stock computer, I'd just continue to use the stock springs. AND for me, I don't like solid lifters, I don't like adjusting tappet's and I don't like shimming. I like the oil pressure keeping everything in spec so I don't have to plan on checking them every 10k miles. That's just me.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Dec 1, 2003
#13
  • Dec 1, 2003
  • #13
140cilx said:
springs. AND for me, I don't like solid lifters, I don't like adjusting tappet's and I don't like shimming. I like the oil pressure keeping everything in spec so I don't have to plan on checking them every 10k miles. That's just me.
Click to expand...

so would i hafta use solid lifters in order to do this setup? I've aske about the durablity of stock springs about the rev limiter, i wasnt sure how safe it was. My plans are to raise the limiter to about 7k , i dont think ill be pulling to a 7k redline, but i want to use it as a buffer zone when/if i use a nitrous setup. Unless im mistaken (very well could be ;o) ) when u hit the revlimiter it starts to cut fuel pressure...and running lean and melting pistions with nitrous isnt my idea of fun ;O) anyone who wants to clarrify some of these details , do so !
thanks again
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Dec 1, 2003
#14
  • Dec 1, 2003
  • #14
the answer I got to your question is every set of stock springs might be a bit different than their brethren. I never had people telling me that they experienced valve float beginning at 7,500 rpm or anything specific.

I know a local guy that raced his carb'd n/a 2.3 flattrack and ran it at 10,000 rpm on stock springs every race the entire race for a season and a half before breaking his crank.

On my nitrous I'm just using a little plug in pill from msd that shut's off the nitrous at 6k. It'll operate in a window like 2500 to 6000. pretty common, $50.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Dec 1, 2003
#15
  • Dec 1, 2003
  • #15
You do realize you will probably have 500-600 bucks minimum in the head if you want to do this right? IMO the money is better spent elsewhere. I can think of much easier ways to gain power. IMO this mod is best left to the guys looking to sqeeze the last 20hp out of their nearly maxed out setup.

Of course, that is only my opinion...you can do whatever you want...it's your money

You don't have to use solid lifters, you don't have to use double springs (although I don't see why not if you have them). You don't have to do anything special except have the head machined properly for the bigger valve seats and have them installed.

You can have a roller cam reground, get a custom slider cam, roller cam, whatever you want...

Stinger
 

Turbobob

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2002
714
0
0
N.B.,Canada
Dec 1, 2003
#16
  • Dec 1, 2003
  • #16
Gotta chime in

OK I gotta chime in with my set up. I've done the big valve install into an oval port head and can see a big difference from the stock set up. I had the valves cut into the head before I unshrouded so I knew how far I had to go. My springs are not dual but show now trouble at all at high rpm. I also have the 60mm throttle body and let me tell you mister.....RESPONSE!!! would be an understatement. I chose this setup mainly 'cause I wanted more flow and throttle response. Well it worked. I can run less boost but get the same power as before. The airflow math has changed of course , but if you realize everything you've done and change accordingly , it's all good.
Needless to say I Love It!!
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Dec 1, 2003
#17
  • Dec 1, 2003
  • #17
Stinger said:
You do realize you will probably have 500-600 bucks minimum in the head if you want to do this right?

Stinger
Click to expand...

if i go with just the valves (same sizes, just not the extra stuff) plus a valvejob i would have ~200 into the head, unless im missing something?
 

Turbobob

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2002
714
0
0
N.B.,Canada
Dec 2, 2003
#18
  • Dec 2, 2003
  • #18
200

Yes that's about right. I allready had an A237 cam and roller followers so it was about thaty much to do the valves in.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Dec 2, 2003
#19
  • Dec 2, 2003
  • #19
well tomorrow im ording my valves, i think my setup will be a fully ported head, new valves, roller rockers/ranger cam. that should take care of the head for the most part. im thinking if i want to have a custom cam someday , i wont hafta pull the head. Right now just setting things up in such a way that upgrades will mostly be accessable/external things that are (more) easily changed out, without having to pull the head, or the entire motor....though it is sooo much fun ;o)
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Dec 3, 2003
#20
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #20
My head as the machine shop right now getting the large valve conversion done.... I am pretty dam excited too....
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
  • Locked
SOLD Code Red 2008 Altima SE V6 coupe in DC
  • atikovi
  • Feb 10, 2013
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
0
Views
822
Other Classifieds Feb 10, 2013
atikovi
A
  • Locked
Expired 1993 Mustang Gt Supercharged Silver W/black Interior, Cobra Upgrades
  • Josh1892
  • Aug 5, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
16K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Mar 25, 2014
StangerHeadFivePointO
S
  • Locked
SOLD 1992 Mustang GT, White, 21k Original, Rare Black Int
  • nyyankee
  • Dec 28, 2012
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
2
Views
15K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jan 9, 2013
nyyankee
  • Locked
1990 5.0 Lx Hatch Twin Turbo
  • Cobra4075
  • Sep 1, 2012
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
3K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Sep 1, 2012
Cobra4075
S
  • Locked
JUST FOUND THIS 66 FASTBACK!!!
  • scottylack
  • Oct 13, 2011
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
1
Views
1K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Oct 13, 2011
N8Dogg98
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?