• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

patriot heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter bansheeyfz
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2009
B

bansheeyfz

New Member
Feb 19, 2008
7
0
0
Jan 7, 2009
#1
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #1
what have people heard about them. just curious in the middle of building a 331 and found patriot heads on jegs for a good price any feedback would be great
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,950
2,905
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 7, 2009
#2
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #2
A friend of mine used then on his 4.6 and they worked great.
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Jan 7, 2009
#3
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #3
all i ever read about patriot is that it is garbage but i realize that you cant beleive everything you read. i have seen some pictures of them out of the box though and i wouldnt never try my chances
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jan 7, 2009
#4
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #4
I've seen them look good and awful out of the box, but I have never seen a set actually make the power or flow what they advertise.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Jan 7, 2009
#5
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #5
Ed Curtis of Flowtech Induction took some pics of a set he bought..
Here's the link
Patriot Freedom pictures - Hardcore 5.0 - The Mustang Drag Racers Forum
 
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 7, 2009
#6
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #6
I have been told they have really good ls1 heads but haven't heard much about the Ford heads.
 
B

Brian@PAR

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
86
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Jan 7, 2009
#7
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #7
That thread on HardCore not withstanding think about this.

Bare patriot heads 695, assembled 935. That's 240.00 in valve train retail.

Our RHS heads have over 400.00 in valve train (solid roller cam) and that's at our cost.

Which heads do you think have better parts? Save your money for something worthwhile.

Any size SBF head for any type cam 1395.00.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Jan 7, 2009
#8
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #8
Ed Curtis said:
The castings are Chinese.

The valvetrain is a mix of various South American companies. Valves may be of India or Mexican decent. Depends on the original supplier.

They do not use Ferrea in their LSx heads, that's a fact. Private label usually mean "cheapest bidder".

If anyone is considering purchasing these heads, you must look at all the pieces being used in the lowest priced heads. Single valve springs, steel retainers, stamped locks and only a "bowl rework" to the heads. They "may be" a decent starting point but if you add up all the peripherals to make them work for any stout hydraulic roller small block, they approach the price of a Twisted Wedge or Dart head with the good parts.
BTW, Gunnar is a great guy to talk to. His customer support is super. I just didn't care for the product line.

Ed
Click to expand...
.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Jan 7, 2009
#9
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #9
Brian@PAR said:
That thread on HardCore not withstanding think about this.

Bare patriot heads 695, assembled 935. That's 240.00 in valve train retail.

Our RHS heads have over 400.00 in valve train (solid roller cam) and that's at our cost.

Which heads do you think have better parts? Save your money for something worthwhile.

Any size SBF head for any type cam 1395.00.
Click to expand...

How do the RHS heads compare with the Canfields and Trick Flows?
 
B

Brian@PAR

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
86
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Jan 7, 2009
#10
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #10
strtrcr50 said:
How do the RHS heads compare with the Canfields and Trick Flows?
Click to expand...

You can't do an apples to apples comparison of those three heads. Well unless you are comparing the High Ports to Canfields but not even then.

The Canfields have raised ports, revised valve placement, and longer runners. The TW heads have a VERY revised valve placement and shorter runners. The RHS are a typical in-line head.

So how are RHS heads different from other in line heads? They have a slightly revised valve placement that helps unshroud the intake valve, but the stud placement is stock. This means you can use a standard stud support if you like. Their exhaust is drilled for both the standard and 3" bolt spacing which is nice if you want to run big tube headers. They have a large area over the valve, about 105% of the valve size. This slows down the charge and helps it make the turn into the cylinder. They have a good (.400) clearance between the chamber and the valve which reduces shrouding and they have a generous clearance around the PR pinch. In flow testing they top out at .700 but loose very little flow from there to 1".

Bottom line with the right cam you can make up to 1.6 HP per CID with their 200 head and 1.4 with their 180 head. I never recommend the 215 head (well maybe for a 408) on a 4.030 bore as the intake is a 2.080 which is really better suited for a 4.125 bore.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Jan 7, 2009
#11
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #11
That being said, in your opinion is it worth it to pay a little more and get either the canfield or trick flows?
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,264
363
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jan 8, 2009
#12
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #12
I bought patriots, they cracked within 4 months of the motor running. Poor castings. My motor didn't get hot, nor did It detonate.......


Took out my motor with them.


You get what u pay for.
 

warriorpluto

Member
Aug 1, 2007
267
1
19
monroe.LA
Jan 8, 2009
#13
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #13
squeak93 said:
I bought patriots, they cracked within 4 months of the motor running. Poor castings. My motor didn't get hot, nor did It detonate.......


Took out my motor with them.


You get what u pay for.
Click to expand...

well.....looks like the patriot heads arent so patriot after all. lol. ill be sticking with my gt40p for a little while longer.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,264
363
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jan 8, 2009
#14
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #14
For the record patriot wanted to try to help me with the head but it would of done nothing for me with the motor damage and the port work I'd already done to the heads. Oh and I had to upgrade the springs b/c the ones on there are chit.......
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Jan 8, 2009
#15
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #15
I am going to stick with 100 percent USA made products IMO
 
B

Brian@PAR

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
86
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Jan 8, 2009
#16
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #16
strtrcr50 said:
That being said, in your opinion is it worth it to pay a little more and get either the canfield or trick flows?
Click to expand...

It depends. Let me frame my answer.

I'm a dealer for all three. Our price on RHS is set to compete directly with the other two. I also make more on RHS than the other two.

So with that said. If you have the some header clearance buy the Canfield 195s. Keep in mind that the exhaust ports are raised .400 so this will move the headers up and out by .200. This may not be an issue for you but I've seen it become one on some cars.

If you have TW pistons then the buy the Fast as Cast.

If either of those two are no or you are unsure then use the RHS. RHS is a very good head. Will you make more power with one over the other? Well maybe, that depends on a lot of things but you get a very large crossection (for the runner size) with the TW and a very efficient port with the Canfields. So I have little choice but to give them the nod.

One thing we offer in both the Canfield and the RHS heads is springs rates set up for your cam. All three use 7/16th studs and all three use 10*locks.

In our RHS there is no up charge for solid roller cams. We typically have to use longer valves (more expensive), longer studs, and the springs are more but the price is the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
229
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
630
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Engine Heads and how to buy
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
317
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
668
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?