• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Pic a cam for my 408 build!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steven Rupp
  • Start date Start date Jun 26, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 26, 2007
#1
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #1
And if I choose your cam profile I will send you a prize.. lol

408 Stroker build from a 351W block
AFR 205 heads
Eagle cast crank and forged rods
SRP forged pistons (10.1:1 compression)
Comp 1.6 roller rockers
Edelbrock Performer RPM Air Gap intake
Holley 950 CFM carb
Mallory disty with 6-AL HyFire box

This will hook to a C4 trans with a 2800 converter, 3.5" alum driveshaft and a Strange 9" rear with 3.70 gears.

Thoughts on what cam would work good for this? Needs to hydraulic, not solid..

Something that makes good power but isn't a pain in the butt to drive on the street.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 26, 2007
#2
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #2
Are you thinking hydr flat tappet or hydr roller. Personally I'd go hydr roller.
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 26, 2007
#3
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #3
blown65 said:
Are you thinking hydr flat tappet or hydr roller. Personally I'd go hydr roller.
Click to expand...

Sorry, roller.

Oh, just ordered 1 3/4" FPA headers..
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 26, 2007
#4
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #4
hey Steve, is it a late model factory roller block or an earlier block. that will make a difference.

i'm going to assume it's an earlier non roller block and you'll be doing the roller conversion on it.

i would use a comp extreme energy retro-fit hyfraulic roller, part number XR-288RF-HR specs are 236/240 duration @.050 and .555/.576 lift on a 110 degree LSA
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 26, 2007
#5
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #5
bnickel said:
hey Steve, is it a late model factory roller block or an earlier block. that will make a difference.

i'm going to assume it's an earlier non roller block and you'll be doing the roller conversion on it.

i would use a comp extreme energy retro-fit hyfraulic roller, part number XR-288RF-HR specs are 236/240 duration @.050 and .555/.576 lift on a 110 degree LSA
Click to expand...


Not to threadjack to a classified ad but I'm going to have my cam/lifters out of my 342 FS soon with almost those exact specs. (Tad more lift and 114 Center) Just PM if your interested and I can give you further info.
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 26, 2007
#6
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #6
bnickel said:
hey Steve, is it a late model factory roller block or an earlier block. that will make a difference.

i'm going to assume it's an earlier non roller block and you'll be doing the roller conversion on it.

i would use a comp extreme energy retro-fit hyfraulic roller, part number XR-288RF-HR specs are 236/240 duration @.050 and .555/.576 lift on a 110 degree LSA
Click to expand...

Hey man, how ya doing?

It's an earlier block.. 2 piece...

I'm much better with LSx stuff.. lol..
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 26, 2007
#7
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #7
blown65 said:
Not to threadjack to a classified ad but I'm going to have my cam/lifters out of my 342 FS soon with almost those exact specs. (Tad more lift and 114 Center) Just PM if your interested and I can give you further info.
Click to expand...

Where I work I get my car parts for free.. but thanks!
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jun 26, 2007
#8
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #8
^^^must be nice. you gonna build the whole motor that way?
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 26, 2007
#9
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #9
Steven Rupp said:
Where I work I get my car parts for free.. but thanks!
Click to expand...


lol, np. Free works also.
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 26, 2007
#10
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #10
tylerrocks said:
^^^must be nice. you gonna build the whole motor that way?
Click to expand...

Yep, it's part of my job description.

I wouldn't use a part just because it's free or cheap, but if it's good for the build then I might as well. I spend quite a bit on car parts as well, but I generally need to do a story a month and I would go broke if I had to buy all the parts.

Back when I bought all my stuff I was lucky to do an upgrade every few months. This car is on an "accelerated schedual" .. lol
 
S

Sweeet Ride

New Member
Jun 20, 2006
24
0
0
Calgary, Alberta
Jun 26, 2007
#11
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #11
I just built and installed this same (408 stroker) in my '67 fastback.
We went all roller, AFR heads, Eagle bottom with h beam rods etc.............
heres' 2 things to think about
1....you won't get the hood closed with that Airgap intake and the Holley carb....we had to switch to a Edelbrock Torquer 2 low profile (2500-5500 rpms) but that allowed us to stay with the Holley carb (Edelbrock carb. is about 1 1/4" lower).
2...be carefull and don't get too lumpy with the cam....lots of unburned fuel fumes come out the tailpipes
3.....this engine produces "a lot" of heat....need aluminum rad or 4 row copper to cool (even up here in Canada).....
4...the Holley 650 is the right carburetor for this engine (we tried the 750 and had to take it off...its too big..the 650 cfm is still good to 6000 rpms (we used a ford h.d. mechanical pump)....if the engine is spending all its time at the far end of a 1/4 mile track a 700 cfm might be better but for everyday street rodding the 650 cfm is definitely it (we asked Holley....and they gave us the correct stats.
no 2 ways about any of the above
note: this engine runs hard (rip your face off hard) with instant throttle response and gets better mileage than my 289 did on the highway.
Good luck!!!
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 27, 2007
#12
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #12
Sweeet Ride said:
I just built and installed this same (408 stroker) in my '67 fastback.
We went all roller, AFR heads, Eagle bottom with h beam rods etc.............
heres' 2 things to think about
1....you won't get the hood closed with that Airgap intake and the Holley carb....we had to switch to a Edelbrock Torquer 2 low profile (2500-5500 rpms) but that allowed us to stay with the Holley carb (Edelbrock carb. is about 1 1/4" lower).
2...be carefull and don't get too lumpy with the cam....lots of unburned fuel fumes come out the tailpipes
3.....this engine produces "a lot" of heat....need aluminum rad or 4 row copper to cool (even up here in Canada).....
4...the Holley 650 is the right carburetor for this engine (we tried the 750 and had to take it off...its too big..the 650 cfm is still good to 6000 rpms (we used a ford h.d. mechanical pump)....if the engine is spending all its time at the far end of a 1/4 mile track a 700 cfm might be better but for everyday street rodding the 650 cfm is definitely it (we asked Holley....and they gave us the correct stats.
no 2 ways about any of the above
note: this engine runs hard (rip your face off hard) with instant throttle response and gets better mileage than my 289 did on the highway.
Good luck!!!
Click to expand...

I would think I would have less hood clearance problems with my Fairlane, especially since I have the higher GT Torino hood.

Which AFR heads you running?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 27, 2007
#13
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #13
Steven Rupp said:
I would think I would have less hood clearance problems with my Fairlane, especially since I have the higher GT Torino hood.

Which AFR heads you running?
Click to expand...


yeah Steve it should fit fine in your car. i've seen people running stealth intakes with 1.2" spacers on 429cj's in their Torino Cobra and GT cars.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 27, 2007
#14
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #14
bnickel said:
hey Steve, is it a late model factory roller block or an earlier block. that will make a difference.

i'm going to assume it's an earlier non roller block and you'll be doing the roller conversion on it.

i would use a comp extreme energy retro-fit hyfraulic roller, part number XR-288RF-HR specs are 236/240 duration @.050 and .555/.576 lift on a 110 degree LSA
Click to expand...

That cam should make 500/500 in a 408. EngineFactory.com sells a 351W with that exact same cam, RPM Performer heads, and an RPM Air Gap intake and it makes 435 hp at 5600 rpm.

http://www.fordcobraengines.com/351_425Carb.htm



With those 205 AFRs and the added displacement, that cam would make some serious numbers.
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 27, 2007
#15
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #15
Thanks guys..

Now I just need to decide if the full roller aluminum COMP rockers are worth the extra coin.
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Jun 27, 2007
#16
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #16
Steven Rupp said:
Thanks guys..

Now I just need to decide if the full roller aluminum COMP rockers are worth the extra coin.
Click to expand...

Over stock? No question..
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 27, 2007
#17
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #17
Dark Knight said:
Over stock? No question..
Click to expand...

Actually I meant over other COMP offerings like the roller tip rockers.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jun 27, 2007
#18
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #18
If the retrofit cam is a reduced base circle piece (and I believe it is), I would pass. Buy the good Crane link bar lifters and then get a standard base circle cam. I would think that the XE282-HR would work fine. If you want a broad torque curve, leave it at teh standard 112LSA. If you want to peak the the power more, have it ground on a 109LSA.
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Jun 27, 2007
#19
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #19
bnickel said:
i would use a comp extreme energy retro-fit hyfraulic roller, part number XR-288RF-HR specs are 236/240 duration @.050 and .555/.576 lift on a 110 degree LSA
Click to expand...

This is what I chose
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 27, 2007
#20
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #20
Steven Rupp said:
This is what I chose
Click to expand...



woo hoo!!!!!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
885
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
  • Locked
Fresh 408 long block
  • hoopty5.0
  • Apr 22, 2012
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
1K
Engine and Power Adder Apr 28, 2012
jdb3rd
S
  • Locked
1994 Mustang GT/331 C4/Las Vegas/$10,500
  • semperfi3533
  • Sep 20, 2011
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Sep 20, 2011
semperfi3533
S
R
91 GT supercharged 408 Swap Mac Headers and
  • redrocksdrew91
  • May 26, 2010
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2010
redrocksdrew91
R
5
  • Locked
1994 Mustang GT Built. 331, C4, coilovers, gears,spool etc.
  • 5.0 gt dreamer
  • May 19, 2011
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
7
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Sep 7, 2011
SQUEEZE&STROKE
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?