• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

question about gears w/ an auto tranny

  • Thread starter Thread starter some_guy
  • Start date Start date Oct 4, 2004

some_guy

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
11
0
0
oahu
Oct 4, 2004
#1
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #1
first i'll apologize if this is something that's been asked ad nauseum and prostate myself for forgiveness heh, since the search didnt turn up anything.
first off, can anyone tell me what cruising rpm @ 65mph are supposed to be for a stock gearing setup with an automatic? mine are right around 2k normal hiway.

2nd, what kind of rpm at the same cruising speed could i expect switching to a 3.55 or 3.73?

background: i bought this car this weekend, and im not that familiar with the 4.6L setups.
thanx

-rob
 
P

prsrizdgt

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
231
0
0
St. Louis
Oct 4, 2004
#2
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #2
Best I remember, my 65mph rpm is 2500 in overdrive. I think the rpm goes up about 250 for every 5 mile per hour increase. 2750 @70....3000 @75
 

some_guy

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
11
0
0
oahu
Oct 5, 2004
#3
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #3
thanx
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#4
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #4
I put 4.10s in my automatic, and the rpms went up about 600 rpms. Do the 4.10s. You won't regret it.
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#5
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #5
I also vote for the 4.10's - to me, 3.73 (and especially 3.55) seem like a waste...for now. After I get my KB Supercharger installed I *might* think that the 4.10's are too much, but then again with an automatic the 4.10's might be pretty fun.
 

01MachGT

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
104
0
0
Marshalltown, IA
Oct 5, 2004
#6
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #6
only reason I went with 3.73s is cuz I plan to supercharge. 3.73s are nice on the NA setup but 4.10s would have been better if I were to stay NA
 

some_guy

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
11
0
0
oahu
Oct 5, 2004
#7
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #7
01mg, so 2600 give or take,, @ 65,, in 4th.. that'd feel like runnin 60 or so with the OD off ..lol dang, they give you that kinda power in 4th?
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Oct 6, 2004
#8
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #8
On a side note, i wouldn't do rear end gears in an automatic. I really didn't feel a difference in my 98GT auto, even when i went from 3.27's to 4.10s

I mean i would SEE a difference when i would pass cars easier on the highway, and sometimes from a launch. But i really didn't FEEL a difference driving around or launching by myself with the auto trans. I dunno, maybe its the whole 4spd with O/D thing.

Not to mention it messed up my speedo a lot. I 'hear' you could get them fixed, but my STEEDA 31 tooth chip or whatever that i bought (speedo-chip, not performance chip) never fixed it. So goodluck with all that. I just wouldn't do gears in an auto again...pesonally.

EDIT: People always told me (on here): "if you have an automatic, don't go with anything less than 4.10s." I guess i know why now...because you dont feel a difference. Maybe 4.30's would have been better?
 

some_guy

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
11
0
0
oahu
Oct 6, 2004
#9
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #9
thanx all,, i'll keep it in mind
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Not Your Average 2011 Mustang GT Review…
  • StuckInNY
  • Jul 21, 2010
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 23, 2010
SP_51-F1
S
Hammer Shifter, Gears, Tranny Cooler - If you have an auto BUY this stuff!!
  • kalvick
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 7, 2008
kalvick
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
Anyone remember this Saleen?
  • LiquidGT
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2008
Demented4.6
D
4.10s vs 3.73s in a fox
  • codemonkey
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
8
Views
798
Regional Forums and Event Information Mar 25, 2006
Repostyle
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?