• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Question about the 2.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndyG47
  • Start date Start date Sep 19, 2005

AndyG47

Member
Aug 20, 2004
0
0
16
Jersey
Sep 19, 2005
#1
  • Sep 19, 2005
  • #1
As you can see by my sig I own a six. But while I was at school today (Lincoln Tech) I saw and old fox body(red gt hatch) and thought it might be nice to possibly own one (after I get a better job) as a comuter car and keep my six as the weekend/show car. Gas milage is ok but could always be better. Seems everytime I turn around I'm tossing $20 into the dam thing.

What I want to know is how is horsepower and gasmilage on the 2.3's both N/A and turbo through a preferable auto trans.

I'm outta Jefferson Township,NJ (Sparta for those of you who need a bigger town, or if you're from around there we sit atop Picatiny Arsenal and a stone's throw from Hercules) my route is about 33 miles/45 mins depending on traffic (why I want an auto) through 3 major highways (RT23, 287, and 202) and a side street or two. Any help appreciated.

Edit: yes i have already tried searching the 2.3 section
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Sep 19, 2005
#2
  • Sep 19, 2005
  • #2
Sorry to tell you but the 2.3 auto's are the worst of the worst. Horribly slow and the AOD tends to blow itself up even when precautions are taken (tranny cooler, etc).

'87-90's have speed density and 88 hp. '91-93's have mass air and 105 hp. Gas mileage is generally pretty good with a good tune, I used to get 30 mpg in my '90 running back and forth to school and work (30 or so miles each way on backroads).

If you're really serious about getting a 2.3 you might want to look into learning to drive a stick

In my turbo coupe I average 24-25 mpg which is pretty decent for a 3500 lb car. I have to run 93 octane, but that's not a huge deal since there is only 20 cents per gallon difference between 93 and 87.
 

tlpilot

New Member
Aug 17, 2004
34
0
0
Denver, CO
Sep 20, 2005
#3
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #3
Red_LX said:
Sorry to tell you but the 2.3 auto's are the worst of the worst. Horribly slow and the AOD tends to blow itself up even when precautions are taken (tranny cooler, etc).
Click to expand...

Amen to that brother... The A4LD isn't a strong tranny...
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Sep 20, 2005
#4
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #4
Oops that's right...A4LD. I was thinking AOD for some reason.
 

Dr_EluSivE

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
2,155
0
56
Central Illinois
Sep 20, 2005
#5
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #5
its already been said, but You dont want a 2.3 auto.. They are slow, and unreliable. If you want a 2.3.. you want 5 speed, And you are probably better off with the 90-93 years, they are a bit higher HP, and i think they tend to be a little more reliable, and get a smidge better milage, also eaiser to mod.

Dr.
 

AndyG47

Member
Aug 20, 2004
0
0
16
Jersey
Sep 20, 2005
#6
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #6
Dr_EluSivE said:
...better off with the 90-93 years, they are a bit higher HP, and i think they tend to be a little more reliable, and get a smidge better milage, also eaiser to mod.
Click to expand...

Black '93 hatch with silver bottom, tinted windows, flowmaster muffler = that's sorta my ideal one for now.



For Red_LX:

You wouldn't happen to know how to take the turbo off a T-bird would you? My dad works with a guy with a 85 2.3L turbo coupe and everytime the wastegate/blow-off valve fires it sends a giant blue cloud of smoke out. It's on it's third or fourth turbo and the wastegate/blow-off has been replaced as well, so now he wants it out.
 

Dr_EluSivE

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
2,155
0
56
Central Illinois
Sep 20, 2005
#7
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #7
its not the turbo, its the valve seals. if he gets the head rebuilt it will probably be fine.

Dr.
 

AndyG47

Member
Aug 20, 2004
0
0
16
Jersey
Sep 20, 2005
#8
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #8
Just for giggles i went on ebay look at this:

http://motors.search.ebay.com/searc...saprclo=&saprchi=&so=Show+Items&fsop=2&fsoo=2

Dr_EluSivE said:
its not the turbo, its the valve seals. if he gets the head rebuilt it will probably be fine.

Dr.
Click to expand...

ok. i'll have my dad tell him. any other possibilities?
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Sep 20, 2005
#9
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #9
Getting a turbo off a car while the engine is still in the car isn't particularly fun. The bottom bolts are almost impossible to get at. You also can't really just throw a turbo onto the n/a engine. Unless you're looking to swap engines you might as well leave it n/a.
 

AndyG47

Member
Aug 20, 2004
0
0
16
Jersey
Sep 21, 2005
#10
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #10
No, he just wants to get the turbo out, and chuck it. If he can get it off and keep the car for another year or so he said that would be great.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
618
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Resource Discussion How To Get The Most Out Of A Trip To The Junkyard.
  • Adieu
  • Nov 4, 2015
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Nov 4, 2015
Adieu
Ford Mustang Themed Pinball Machine
  • MRaburn
  • Feb 6, 2014
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
1
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Feb 6, 2014
Noobz347
F
Question about a miss
  • FUTURE_OF_GM
  • Oct 6, 2011
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
626
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2011
1987stangman
C
Question From A New Member About GT's
  • carlyanncollins
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 3, 2008
red05bullitgt
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?