• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Quick Tubular K-Member Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lynx331
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2005
L

Lynx331

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
308
0
0
Chicago IL
Nov 14, 2005
#1
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #1
Im considering putting a tubular K-Member on my car. From what im hearing tho.. its not a wise choice for a mostly street driven vehicle. Is this true? Im hearing that if u hit a decent pot hole the tubular will bend much easier than the stock K-Member.. is there any truth to this? Is there any advantage with going with a Tubular over the stocker? Thanks guys


:SNSign:
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Nov 14, 2005
#2
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #2
The basic advantage to aftermarket k-members is weight savings. With the use of coilovers as well you can shave off a good amount of weight. Your options should first be categorized by what your doing with the car. Drag or Road Race. Street setups can fall under drag setup for the most part. And for good street and drag setup I would go with PA Racing or AJE.

For Road racing I would go with Griggs or MM. The griggs and MM setups allow different mounting positions for the control arms to correct suspension geometry for corning. And they are built a little better however dont shave off as much weight as the PA or AJE k-members. (PA and AJE also charge extra for Road Racing options. Thicker walled tubing ect.)

Dont get me wrong, there are other k-members out there that work great. Like upr. And the PA Racing ang AJE units by no means weak. Figure out what you want the car capable of doing and choose acordingly.

Now for potholes and such. I personally think keeping the stock k-member and control arms will provide the most amount of strength. So any of the k-members I mentioned above would be a step down in durability.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Nov 14, 2005
#3
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #3
As numbles said, the k member is about wieght savings.

They are known to ride rough and most are far weaker than a stock k member.

If you notice the wieght of the better quality ones like the Kenny brown, it saves almost no wieght at all.

The AJE is good, because you can use stock style springs which are better than coil overs (which wear out in no time on a street car), but the AJE if i remember correctly has NO bushings in the arms, making for a horrific street ride.

You want to save wieght on the front of the car?
Put your battery in the trunk (doesn't actually save, but works awesome for traction) and buy a set of aluminum heads.
Nothing personal but if the mods in your sig are the only ones are your car, you are not at the k member level. The money can be better spent on other performance parts. Not sure of the Griggs price, but i'm sure it's way up there as is the MM kit. You want the good stuff, you are certainly going to have to pay for it.
 
B

BlackSaleenS281

Banned
Apr 22, 2005
117
0
0
Nov 14, 2005
#4
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #4
What about adding a MM K Member brace for everyday street driving on a '86 vert?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Nov 14, 2005
#5
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #5
BlackSaleenS281 said:
What about adding a MM K Member brace for everyday street driving on a '86 vert?
Click to expand...

I think that part is cheap right? I guess you can, but i wouldn't waste my money.
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Nov 14, 2005
#6
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #6
I think the brace is worhless unless your a hardcore autocrosser or road racer.
 
I

iapexl8r

Member
Apr 1, 2005
254
0
17
Nov 14, 2005
#7
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #7
mm k member

most after-market kmembers have revised suspension geometry. I have a mm k member it lengthend the wheel base over 1" and has 2 options for mounting the lower control arms one for real low and one for low. it also corrects for steering problems by relocating the rack and pinion. they also come drilled for lowering the engine 1" or moving it back and lowering it 1 " both ways. the weight savings is just an added bonus. some dude named Major Mathis wrote a book (mustang performanceII)that has a lot of real good info on the fox body mustang suspensions woes and their fixes Chris
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Nov 14, 2005
#8
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #8
i have dnd k member, lower arms, and coil over kit.. all for free basically.. came with a car we just bought.. im just gonna use the stock arms and all but with the tubular k member.. i added some weight with other things i've done
 
J

jerryD

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
1,061
0
37
Gladstone, MO
Nov 14, 2005
#9
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #9
if you use the stock arms, you will have to switch to coil o's, or get spring perches to use the factory spring. keep that in mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
New Member Looking to Share a Secret to a Better & Most Reliable Ford
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Dec 17, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 18, 2021
Bullitt347
C
Question about tubular k-member and headers.
  • Chris98Cobra
  • May 30, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 30, 2018
Chris98Cobra
C
D
97 Mustang Gt Motor Mount Install With Qa1 Tubular K Member
  • Dboypuckett
  • Jan 19, 2018
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2018
Dboypuckett
D
Oil Pan Needs Replaced. Tubular K-member Questions.
  • Slo5Oh89
  • Nov 28, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 29, 2016
mikestang63
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?