• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech

Real world mileage with the 2011 V6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimTMich
  • Start date Start date Oct 12, 2010
J

JimTMich

Member
Mar 20, 2003
161
0
16
Michigan
Oct 12, 2010
#1
  • Oct 12, 2010
  • #1
EPA says 19 -31.

So what is everybody really getting and qualify those numbers with how you drive and what type of driving.
 

1wildGT

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
1,026
6
38
Abilene TX
Oct 13, 2010
#2
  • Oct 13, 2010
  • #2
My wife gets 25 ave in her v-6 with mixed city/highway (normal driving). When I drive it (highway) I can get 32 - 33 if I cruise at 55 - 60 with A/C on (babying it for max mpg). If I go 70 it drops to about 29 mpg.

Pretty good for a Mustang.
 
A

AlbertaEthan

Member
Oct 6, 2010
49
2
8
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Oct 16, 2010
#3
  • Oct 16, 2010
  • #3
The couple times I've taken it out on the highway I'm getting about 8L/100 km (29ish mpg) doing roughly 130km/h (80mph). Going to school (mixed driving) I get about 11L/100km (21mpg) if I'm nice to it hehe
 
A

a_guerrajr

New Member
Oct 11, 2010
9
0
0
Oct 19, 2010
#4
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #4
combined i'm at around 26mpg, still havent hit 1K
 
M

maddog05

New Member
May 30, 2009
8
0
1
Nov 1, 2010
#5
  • Nov 1, 2010
  • #5
great mpg

after 2000 mile break in 33 mpg hyghway at 52 mph
mixed drivlng 27 mpg keeping rev down below 2000
26 if just mixed and relaxed
 
W

Wrxified

New Member
Nov 14, 2010
3
0
0
West Michigan
Nov 14, 2010
#6
  • Nov 14, 2010
  • #6
Did my first trip on the highway this week. I did about 563 miles roundtrip going from Grand Rapids MI to Milwaukee WI. This was a great way to measure realistic mpg on the HWY because you drive through 4 states with speed limits ranging between 55 and 70 mph. Plus there was a little bit of construction and Chicago bumper-to-bumper traffic thrown into the mix. Of the 563 miles about 25 of it was off the expressway traveling between the hotels, restaurants and customer locations. Here are my calculations, mods and information. Also just to clarify, while I believe the car's info commuter is fairly accurate, nothing is quite as accurate as starting with a full tank and then recording miles driven/gallons used at each fill up. This is how I measured it.

* 3.31 gears
* 6 spd manual
* Only modification at the time was my Bama tune (93 octane Performance Tune)
* 563.7 miles driven, 19.64 gallons of 93 octane used = 28.7 mpg (Car calculated it to 27.4)


Overall I'm very happy with those numbers.
 

echo7

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
706
41
59
FL
Nov 14, 2010
#7
  • Nov 14, 2010
  • #7
Not bad at all for 3.31 gears
 
W

willie2323

New Member
Jun 21, 2010
8
0
0
Dec 2, 2010
#8
  • Dec 2, 2010
  • #8
3.31 gears

Wrxified,
Do you have the performance package? I am really excited about this package and curious as to others impressions that actually have this package.

thanx,

Bill in Phoenix
 
W

Wrxified

New Member
Nov 14, 2010
3
0
0
West Michigan
Dec 2, 2010
#9
  • Dec 2, 2010
  • #9
Bill - I do have the performance package and to tell you the truth I'm kind of torn on it so far.

Here is how I break it down so far.

  • Wheels: Well they're okay. I'm not a huge fan of the style. They remind me of a lot of wheels you would see on the shelf at Discount Tire.
  • 3:31 rear: Love it but I wouldn't be surprised if I swapped it down the road some day for a 3:73.
  • Performance ECU parameters. Haven't done any real world testing at the track to have an opinion one way or another. I think a lot of people assume you get some cool setting that makes the car quicker off the line. I don't think that is what it's doing. My understanding is that it just lets you push it further before the stability control interferes.
  • Supsension: Not worth it in my opinion. I'll be replacing the shocks/springs eventually. I hate the lifted look.
  • Brakes: Love them. What's not to love? They stop on a dime.

Like anything it's going to come down to a person's opinion. If you like the style of wheel, never want more than a 3:31 rear, and don't think the car has a lifted sort of look then the performance package is an awesome deal. I personally would have jumped in a heartbeat to have the $1700 or so Brembo upgrade that GT owners have. I love the style of wheel, drool over the Brembo brakes and could add the 3:31 rear separate then if I wanted.
 
W

willie2323

New Member
Jun 21, 2010
8
0
0
Dec 5, 2010
#10
  • Dec 5, 2010
  • #10
thanx for that info, very nice objective opinions. yea on the lifted look, way to high in the rear.
hmmm, performance ECU parameters? I didnt know that was part of the package.

bill
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
warmed up, hard re-starting on hot days
  • michaelleewebb
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
290
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
123
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
443
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
113
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
C
5r55s auto to TR3650 Manual swap 4.0 V6
  • Ceskz
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Mar 27, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?