• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Red headed step-child?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flaming70vw
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2005
F

flaming70vw

New Member
Dec 13, 2004
44
0
0
May 3, 2005
#1
  • May 3, 2005
  • #1
I have heard that the 94-95 mustangs are the red headed step-child. Why? I have only owned one in my life at it has converted me to the mustang.
 

kristopher

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
8
0
0
Mesa, Arizona
May 3, 2005
#2
  • May 3, 2005
  • #2
No the Mustang II is the red headed stepchild
 
S

slytherin

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
702
1
0
northeast ohio
May 3, 2005
#3
  • May 3, 2005
  • #3
kristopher said:
No the Mustang II is the red headed stepchild
Click to expand...
You mean the hopped up Pinto right LOL!
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
May 3, 2005
#4
  • May 3, 2005
  • #4
In my opinion 94-95 GT's are the best year for the mustang. Old school power, with upgraded looks.
 

sociopath5.0

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
155
0
0
somewhere near Louisville, KY
May 3, 2005
#5
  • May 3, 2005
  • #5
I think it may be because there are only two model years, and parts are somewhat limited by comparsion to the 87-93's. You can find just about anything anywhere for the Foxes. Not always so for our cars, especially Cobras. Ane xample would be I ordered a Hi Miler hose kit for my snake, and everything is exactly the same except for the lower radiator hose. I just used a molded replacement since you never really see it anyway. BTW anyone need a Hi Miler lower radiator hose for a 94-95 GT?
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 3, 2005
#6
  • May 3, 2005
  • #6
matthiasj said:
In my opinion 94-95 GT's are the best year for the mustang. Old school power, with upgraded looks.
Click to expand...


 

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
May 3, 2005
#7
  • May 3, 2005
  • #7
yea I read in some magazine, can't remember which, but they said something about the 94-95s being the red-headed stepchild of the late-model mustangs, and I got very offended. If any should be the red headed stepchild it should be the 96-98s
 
O

oohsoobad2

Banned
Dec 17, 2004
127
0
0
May 3, 2005
#8
  • May 3, 2005
  • #8
I personally love 94-95 GT's, Id buy one before Id get a 96-98. I think they are looked down on because the car weighed alot more than the Foxes, but had the same engine. Plus the computers were finicky. When those cars came out, I was praying for a 351, it would have been the perfect response to the LT1 that came out in 93. If those cars came with 351's Id have one instead of my 99 GT.
 

95riosnake

Member
Dec 21, 2003
630
0
17
Pittsburgh, PA
May 3, 2005
#9
  • May 3, 2005
  • #9
flaming70vw said:
I have heard that the 94-95 mustangs are the red headed step-child.
Click to expand...

I would say they are more like the middle child that gets forgotten about.

It's mainly the aftermarket that shuns us a bit. They have tons of 5.0 parts, but anything that depends on the rest of the car generally needs to be redesigned, so they skip all the work of designing it for a market of 2 production years and skip to 96 it seems (even though 96-98 was only 3...).

I still wouldn't want any other year other than a 70 Mach 1.
 

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
May 4, 2005
#10
  • May 4, 2005
  • #10
but with the slight differences between the 96-97s and the 98s I have seen some parts specifically for the 1998, and for the 1996-1997s, so I wouldnt think it would be that big a deal for aftermarket
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
May 4, 2005
#11
  • May 4, 2005
  • #11
oohsoobad2 said:
I personally love 94-95 GT's, Id buy one before Id get a 96-98. I think they are looked down on because the car weighed alot more than the Foxes, but had the same engine. Plus the computers were finicky. When those cars came out, I was praying for a 351, it would have been the perfect response to the LT1 that came out in 93. If those cars came with 351's Id have one instead of my 99 GT.
Click to expand...
They did come out with a 351 it's in the 95 Cobra R
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
May 4, 2005
#12
  • May 4, 2005
  • #12
1994Vib.RedGT said:
but with the slight differences between the 96-97s and the 98s I have seen some parts specifically for the 1998, and for the 1996-1997s, so I wouldnt think it would be that big a deal for aftermarket
Click to expand...
I'ver heard 98 was a bit different ford was getting ready for the 99+. The 98 GT's also came with 225hp instead of the 215 96-97 got and us.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
May 4, 2005
#13
  • May 4, 2005
  • #13
yeah, 98's got the returnless fuel system, no dash clock also, with the updated interior with cupholders in the ashtray area
 
O

oohsoobad2

Banned
Dec 17, 2004
127
0
0
May 4, 2005
#14
  • May 4, 2005
  • #14
wytstang said:
They did come out with a 351 it's in the 95 Cobra R
Click to expand...


Yes they did and it ran easy 12's. A new GT cant even touch that..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Hello
  • kemenya
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
111
The Welcome Wagon Mar 15, 2026
Noobz347
J
SN95 Hello new to this app
  • James S
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
125
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
I
I'm gonna have so many questions (but I know how to search)
  • ironhorsewayne
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
214
The Welcome Wagon Jun 8, 2026
Noobz347
Old guy new to Forum.
  • 08shelby GT500
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
162
The Welcome Wagon Jun 15, 2026
LILCBRA
T
New Guy from Southeast Missouri
  • tcooke11
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
270
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2026
TomcatPC
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?